| Literature DB >> 27149858 |
V Leuci1,2, F Maione3, R Rotolo1,2, E Giraudo3,4, F Sassi5, G Migliardi5, M Todorovic2, L Gammaitoni2, G Mesiano2, L Giraudo2, P Luraghi6, F Leone1,7, F Bussolino1,8, G Grignani7, M Aglietta1,7, L Trusolino1,5, A Bertotti1,5, D Sangiolo9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis inhibition is a promising approach for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recent evidences support the seemingly counterintuitive ability of certain antiangiogenic drugs to promote normalization of residual tumor vessels with important clinical implications. Lenalidomide is an oral drug with immune-modulatory and anti-angiogenic activity against selected hematologic malignancies but as yet little is known regarding its effectiveness for solid tumors. The aim of this study was to determine whether lenalidomide can normalize colorectal cancer neo-vessels in vivo, thus reducing tumor hypoxia and improving the benefit of chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Lenalidomide; Tumor-vessel normalization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27149858 PMCID: PMC4857418 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0872-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Lenalidomide reduces mCRC vessel density. a Lenalidomide significantly reduced tumor vessel density, assessed by CD146 expression, in 5 mice with mCRC tumorgraft compared to the controls treated with irrelevant vehicle or 5FU (p = 0.0001). The cumulative values are presented as mean ± SEM of MOF, the groups were compared by one-way ANOVA. Post analysis comparisons of each group with the control vehicle was performed with Bonferroni post-test analysis (p < 0.05 for 5FU, p < 0.0001 for lenalidomide). b The pictures report representative IHC images of CD146 expression in the mice treated with lenalidomide and control vehicle. MOF, microscopic observation fields; (*), P ≤ 0.05; (**), P ≤ 0.01; (***), P ≤ 0.001; (****), P ≤ 0.0001
Fig. 2Lenalidomide enhances pericyte coverage of residual mCRC vessels. a Lenalidomide significantly enhanced mature pericyte coverage, reported as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of α-SMA (p = 0.04) and NG-2 (P = 0.0002) co-localized on vessel areas (MECA32), the results were compared with one-way ANOVA. The values are presented as mean ± SEM of MOF, 3 mice with mCRC tumorgraft per group were included in the experiments. Post analysis comparisons of each group was performed with Bonferroni post-test analysis, resulting in significant p values of lenalidomide against vehicle (*p < 0.05, for α-SMA) and against 5FU (***p < 0.001, for NG2) b Representative immunofluorescence picture showing co-localization (merge) of NG2 pericyte marker (green) and Meca32 endothelial marker (red) in tumor samples from mice treated with lenalidomide and control vehicle. MOF, Microscopic observation fields; (*), P ≤ 0.05; (**), P ≤ 0.01; (***), P ≤ 0.001
Fig. 3Lenalidomide enhances vessel perfusion capability and decreases tumor hypoxia. a Lenalidomide significantly enhanced the perfusion capability of residual tumor vessels reported as MFI of lectin/MECA32 ratio, indicative of vessels with regular perfusion, normalized on total vessel area (p = 0.004 obtained with one-way analysis). The experiments included 3 mice with mCRC tumorgraft per group and the values are presented as mean ± SEM of MOF. Post analysis comparisons (*) of each group to control vehicle was performed with Bonferroni post-test analysis (p < 0.01 for lenalidomide). b Representative immunofluorescence picture showing blood perfusion (lectin in green) within residual tumor vessels (Meca32 violet as endothelial marker) in mice treated with lenalidomide and vehicle control. c Lenalidomide significantly reduced extension of tumor hypoxic areas (p = 0.002) obtained with one-way ANOVA analysis (Kruskal–Wallis). The experiments included 3 mice per group. The graph reports values (plus mean ± SEM) of each hypoxic area calculated in vital areas of MOF. Post test analysis comparisons of lenalidomide with control vehicle (p < 0.05 *) and 5FU (p < 0.001**) was performed with Bonferroni post-test analysis. d Representative immunofluorescence picture showing hypoxic areas (hypoxyprobe) in sections of tumors from mice treated with lenalidomide and control vehicle. The nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). MOF, Microscopic observation fields; (*), P ≤ 0.05; (**), P ≤ 0.01
Fig. 4Vessel normalization by lenalidomide enhances chemotherapy activity. a The combination of lenalidomide and 5FU significantly delayed tumor growth. The experiments included 8 mice per group. Curves with mean tumor volume at each week are reported in the graph, the arrow indicates the start of treatments. The groups were compared with two-way ANOVA and post analysis comparisons at the end of treatment for each group versus control vehicle with Bonferroni post-test analysis. The percentage of tumor growth inhibition for each group of treatment compared to untreated controls is reported below the curves. b Representative histologic images (H&E staining) for each group of treatment. Combination of lenalidomide-5FU was associated with the restoration of tissue organization resembling physiologic colon structures
Fig. 5Combination of Lenalidomide-5FU reduced mCRC proliferation index. a The combination of lenalidomide and 5FU significantly reduced Ki67 proliferation index in mice with mCRC tumorgraft (N = 6), compared to controls treated with 5FU (N = 5), Lenalidomide (N = 5) or vehicle (N = 6) (p = 0.0002 with one-way ANOVA analysis). The post analysis comparisons of each group to control vehicle was performed with Bonferroni post-test analysis (p < 0.001 for combination therapy). b Representative IHC picture of tumor Ki67 expression in each group of treatment. c Combination treatment showed effects similar to those observed with lenalidomide for both structural (pericyte coverage) and functional essays (blood perfusion). In the figure is reported a representative immunofluorescence picture showing blood perfusion (lectin in green) within residual tumor vessels (MECA 32 violet as endothelial marker, α-SMA in red for pericyte coverage) in mice treated with lenalidomide, vehicle control, 5-FU and combination treatment (Yellow/white color indicates merging of lectin/MECA32/α-SMA)
Fig. 6Lenalidomide is devoid of direct tumoricidal activity. Lenalidomide did not have direct cytotoxic activity against 4 different CRC cell lines in vitro (HCT116, LS513, SKCO-1 and LoVo). The panel reports data (mean ± SEM) relative to cytotoxic activity against HCT116 (a), SK-CO-1 (b), LS513 (c) and LoVo (d) (4 independent experiments, each with 10 replicates). The groups were compared with one-way ANOVA and post analysis comparisons (***) of each group to control vehicle and lenalidomide was carried out with Bonferroni post-test analysis. (***) P ≤ 0.001