Literature DB >> 27149495

Facial Nerve Anomaly in a Patient With a Parotid Tumor: A Case Report.

Dong Hoon Lee1, Tae Mi Yoon, Joon Kyoo Lee, Sang Chul Lim.   

Abstract

The branching pattern of the facial nerve varies among individuals. These variations increase the risk of facial nerve injury during parotid surgery. We report a new variation of the facial nerve and an unusual relationship with the retromandibular vein during parotid surgery.Clinicians should recognize this facial anomaly and the unusual relationship with the retromandibular vein to avoid injuring the facial nerve during parotid surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27149495      PMCID: PMC4863812          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


INTRODUCTION

Identifying and protecting the facial nerve is important and essential during parotid surgery.[1,2] However, variations in the facial nerve have been reported and they increase the risk of facial nerve injury during parotid surgery.[1] Herein, we report a unique case of a parotid tumor in conjunction with a facial nerve anomaly.

Key Points

We report a new variation in the facial nerve pattern, and an unusual relationship with the retromandibular vein during parotid surgery. Clinicians should recognize this facial anomaly and the unusual relationship with the retromandibular vein to avoid injuring the facial nerve during parotid surgery.

CASE REPORT

A 22-year-old female presented to our department with left infra-auricular swelling present for >2 years. The patient's medical history was unremarkable. A physical examination revealed a solitary, firm, nontender, mobile, and ∼3-cm sized mass in the left parotid gland. A computed tomography scan of the neck demonstrated a 3.2 × 2.3 cm well-defined, heterogeneously enhancing mass in the left parotid gland (Figure 1). Fine-needle aspiration cytology revealed pleomorphic adenoma of the left parotid gland.
FIGURE 1

Neck computed tomography scan demonstrates a 3.2 × 2.3 cm well-defined, heterogeneously enhancing mass in the left parotid gland.

Neck computed tomography scan demonstrates a 3.2 × 2.3 cm well-defined, heterogeneously enhancing mass in the left parotid gland. Based on these observations, the preoperative diagnosis was a left-side superficial parotid tumor. A modified face lift incision was performed and a skin flap was elevated anteriorly, exposing the parotid gland. The dissection continued along the tragal pointer to identify the facial nerve. We found the main trunk of the facial nerve in the anticipated location and the nerve was dissected anteriorly and superiorly. We observed 2 unusual nerves ascending to the preauricular region and connecting to the facial nerve. After superficial parotidectomy preserving the facial nerve including the 2 unusual nerves, the 2 unusual nerves were found to connect to the temporofacial division from the main trunk of the facial nerve and were confirmed to be the facial nerve using the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring (NIM) 2.0 system (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN) (Figure 2). In addition, an anomalous relationship was detected between the retromandibular vein and the facial nerve. The retromandibular vein was lateral to the cervicofacial division and medial to the temporofacial division (Figure 2). The patient had no temporary or permanent postoperative facial nerve palsy. The histopathological analysis of the parotid mass demonstrated pleomorphic adenoma. The patient has been regularly followed up without a recurrence.
FIGURE 2

Two unusual nerves (arrows) connected to the temporofacial division from the facial nerve main trunk are detected after superficial parotidectomy, and the retromandibular vein (arrowheads) is lateral to the cervicofacial division but medial to the temporofacial division.

Two unusual nerves (arrows) connected to the temporofacial division from the facial nerve main trunk are detected after superficial parotidectomy, and the retromandibular vein (arrowheads) is lateral to the cervicofacial division but medial to the temporofacial division. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Chonnam National University Hwansun Hospital. Informed consent was given by the patient.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of facial nerve palsy during parotid surgery is up to 21%.[3] Therefore, understanding surgical landmarks for the facial nerve is essential for safe and effective parotid surgery.[4] The most commonly used surgical landmarks are the stylomastoid foramen, the tympanomastoid suture, the posterior belly of the digastric muscle, the tragal pointer, and the retromandibular vein.[1,2,4,5] Among these landmarks, the retromandibular vein is most commonly used to locate lesions and the facial nerve.[1,5] Several reports have found that the retromandibular vein is medial to the facial nerve in up to 90% of cases. However, in the present case, retromandibular vein was lateral to the cervicofacial division and medial to the temporofacial division. The branching pattern of the facial nerve varies among individuals.[4] The most common branching pattern is cerviocofacial and temporofacial divisions.[4] However, we observed 2 unusual nerves connecting the temporofacial division in the present case. These 2 nerves were confirmed to be the facial nerve using an NIM system. A limitation of this report is that we never found the origin of these unusual nerves. In conclusion, we report a new variation in the facial nerve pattern, and an unusual relationship with the retromandibular vein during parotid surgery. Clinicians should recognize this facial anomaly and the unusual relationship with retromandibular vein to avoid injuring the facial nerve during parotid surgery. Intraoperative nerve monitoring and careful dissection are important to avoid intraoperative facial nerve injury, particularly in patients with a facial nerve anomaly.
  5 in total

1.  Anomalous relationship of the retromandibular vein to the facial nerve as a potential risk factor for facial nerve injury during parotidectomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Babademez; Baran Acar; Emre Gunbey; Hayriye Karabulut; Riza Murat Karasen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Relations of the facial nerve with the retromandibular vein: anatomic study of 132 parotid glands.

Authors:  Gaoussou Touré; Christian Vacher
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Anomalous location of facial nerve deep to parotid gland.

Authors:  Ashwin R Rai; Rohan Rai; Keshav Bhat; Rajalakshmi Rai
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Identification of facial nerve during parotidectomy: a combined anatomical & surgical study.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Sudipta Pal; Moushumi Sengupta; Kanishka Chowdhury; Vedula Padmini Saha; Lopamudra Mondal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-07-24

5.  Parotid gland tumours in 255 consecutive patients: Mount Sinai Hospital's quality assurance review.

Authors:  Everton Gooden; Ian J Witterick; David Hacker; Irving B Rosen; Jeremy L Freeman
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-12
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  An Unusual Position of Retromandibular Vein in Relation to Facial Nerve: A Rare Case Report.

Authors:  Nabin Lageju; Prabhat Chandra Thakur; Pravin Kumar Jaiswal
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-06

2.  Anatomic variation of the relation between the facial nerve and the retromandibular vein during superficial parotidectomy: A rare case report.

Authors:  Menelaos Zoulamoglou; Maria Zarokosta; Ioannis Kaklamanos; Τheodoros Piperos; Ioannis Flessas; Dimosthenis Kakaviatos; Vasileios Kalles; Vasileios Bonatsos; Markos Sgantzos; Theodoros Mariolis-Sapsakos
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.