Literature DB >> 27148862

Models for predicting enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand.

Jayasooriya A D R N Appuhamy1, James France2, Ermias Kebreab1.   

Abstract

There are several models in the literature for predicting enteric methane (CH4 ) emissions. These models were often developed on region or country-specific data and may not be able to predict the emissions successfully in every region. The majority of extant models require dry matter intake (DMI) of individual animals, which is not routinely measured. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate performance of extant models in predicting enteric CH4 emissions from dairy cows in North America (NA), Europe (EU), and Australia and New Zealand (AUNZ) and (ii) explore the performance using estimated DMI. Forty extant models were challenged on 55, 105, and 52 enteric CH4 measurements (g per lactating cow per day) from NA, EU, and AUNZ, respectively. The models were ranked using root mean square prediction error as a percentage of the average observed value (RMSPE) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). A modified model of Nielsen et al. (Acta Agriculturae Scand Section A, 63, 2013 and 126) using DMI, and dietary digestible neutral detergent fiber and fatty acid contents as predictor variables, were ranked highest in NA (RMSPE = 13.1% and CCC = 0.78). The gross energy intake-based model of Yan et al. (Livestock Production Science, 64, 2000 and 253) and the updated IPCC Tier 2 model were ranked highest in EU (RMSPE = 11.0% and CCC = 0.66) and AUNZ (RMSPE = 15.6% and CCC = 0.75), respectively. DMI of cows in NA and EU was estimated satisfactorily with body weight and fat-corrected milk yield data (RMSPE < 12.0% and CCC > 0.60). Using estimated DMI, the Nielsen et al. (2013) (RMSPE = 12.7 and CCC = 0.79) and Yan et al. (2000) (RMSPE = 13.7 and CCC = 0.50) models still predicted emissions in respective regions well. Enteric CH4 emissions from dairy cows can be predicted successfully (i.e., RMSPE < 15%), if DMI can be estimated with reasonable accuracy (i.e., RMSPE < 10%).
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; North America; Oceania; dairy cows; enteric methane; prediction models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27148862     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  18 in total

Review 1.  A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types-The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Xuezhao Sun; Long Cheng; Arjan Jonker; Sineka Munidasa; David Pacheco
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Estimates of the genetic contribution to methane emission in dairy cows: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Ruminal methane emissions, metabolic, and microbial profile of Holstein steers fed forage and concentrate, separately or as a total mixed ration.

Authors:  Rajaraman Bharanidharan; Selvaraj Arokiyaraj; Eun Bae Kim; Chang Hyun Lee; Yang Won Woo; Youngjun Na; Danil Kim; Kyoung Hoon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Partitioning the efficiency of utilization of amino acids in growing broilers: Multiple linear regression and multivariate approaches.

Authors:  Matheus De Paula Reis; Nilva Kazue Sakomura; Izabelle A M A Teixeira; Edney Pereira da Silva; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Construction and Operation of a Respiration Chamber of the Head-Box Type for Methane Measurement from Cattle.

Authors:  Octavio Alonso Castelán Ortega; Paulina Elizabeth Pedraza Beltrán; Gloria Stefanny Hernández Pineda; Mohammed Benaouda; Manuel González Ronquillo; Luisa T Molina; Juan Carlos Ku Vera; Hugo Daniel Montelongo Pérez; María Fernanda Vázquez Carrillo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Binchang Li; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Modelling the Effect of Diet Composition on Enteric Methane Emissions across Sheep, Beef Cattle and Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Matt Bell; Richard Eckard; Peter J Moate; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effect of Feeding Improved Grass Hays and Eragrostis Tef Straw Silage on Milk Yield, Nitrogen Utilization, and Methane Emission of Lactating Fogera Dairy Cows in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Shigdaf Mekuriaw; Atsushi Tsunekawa; Toshiyoshi Ichinohe; Firew Tegegne; Nigussie Haregeweyn; Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Asaminew Tassew; Yeshambel Mekuriaw; Misganaw Walie; Mitsuru Tsubo; Toshiya Okuro; Derege Tsegaye Meshesha; Mulugeta Meseret; Laiju Sam; Veerle Fievez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database.

Authors:  Mutian Niu; Ermias Kebreab; Alexander N Hristov; Joonpyo Oh; Claudia Arndt; André Bannink; Ali R Bayat; André F Brito; Tommy Boland; David Casper; Les A Crompton; Jan Dijkstra; Maguy A Eugène; Phil C Garnsworthy; Md Najmul Haque; Anne L F Hellwing; Pekka Huhtanen; Michael Kreuzer; Bjoern Kuhla; Peter Lund; Jørgen Madsen; Cécile Martin; Shelby C McClelland; Mark McGee; Peter J Moate; Stefan Muetzel; Camila Muñoz; Padraig O'Kiely; Nico Peiren; Christopher K Reynolds; Angela Schwarm; Kevin J Shingfield; Tonje M Storlien; Martin R Weisbjerg; David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Growth performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions from Murrah calves fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios.

Authors:  Vinu M Nampoothiri; Madhu Mohini; Bilal A Malla; Goutam Mondal; Sujata Pandita
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.