Literature DB >> 27148854

The Recovery College: A unique service approach and qualitative evaluation.

Katherine Newman-Taylor1, Nicola Stone2, Paul Valentine2, Zoe Hooks1, Katherine Sault3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of a Recovery College, an educational service model focusing specifically on health care to engage people's hope, agency, and opportunities for recovery.
METHOD: For the purpose of the study, a qualitative approach was used given the absence of research in this area. Eleven people completed semistructured interviews conducted by an independent researcher. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The analyses yielded themes emphasizing the impact of the organizational structure of the college. Coproduction of service delivery was contrasted with traditional provision and identified as fundamental to personal and professional changes made. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Recovery College participants described clear gains. These findings are discussed in relation to the recovery literature and highlight the need for routine coproduction of services to facilitate recovery from the often devastating impact of mental ill-health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27148854     DOI: 10.1037/prj0000179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J        ISSN: 1095-158X


  5 in total

Review 1.  The impact of Recovery Colleges on mental health staff, services and society.

Authors:  A Crowther; A Taylor; R Toney; S Meddings; T Whale; H Jennings; K Pollock; P Bates; C Henderson; J Waring; M Slade
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 2.  Co-production in health policy and management: a comprehensive bibliometric review.

Authors:  Floriana Fusco; Marta Marsilio; Chiara Guglielmetti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions.

Authors:  Natasha Lyons; Chris Cooper; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Comparison of a co-produced mental health service to traditional services: A co-produced mixed-methods cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raffaella Pocobello; Tarek El Sehity; Luca Negrogno; Carlo Minervini; Maddalena Guida; Cosimo Venerito
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.503

5.  A narrative study of mental health recovery: exploring unique, open-ended and collective processes.

Authors:  Nina Petersen Reed; Staffan Josephsson; Sissel Alsaker
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.