| Literature DB >> 27147934 |
Abstract
Fusarium graminearum Schwabe causes Fusarium head blight (FHB), a devastating disease that leads to extensive yield and quality loss of wheat and other cereal crops. Twelve isolates of F. graminearum were collected from naturally infected spikes of wheat from Assiut Egypt. These isolates were compared using SRAP. The results indicated distinct genetic groups exist within F. graminearum, and demonstrated that these groups have different biological properties, especially with respect to their pathogenicity on wheat. There were biologically significant differences between the groups; with group (B) isolates being more aggressive towards wheat than groups (A) and (C). Furthermore, Trichoderma harzianum (Rifai) and Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) which isolated from wheat kernels were screened for antagonistic activity against F. graminearum. They significantly reduced the growth of F. graminearum colonies in culture. In order to gain insight into biological control effect in situ, highly antagonistic isolates of T. harzianum and B. subtilis were selected, based on their in vitro effectiveness, for greenhouse test. It was revealed that T. harzianum and B. subtilis significantly reduced FHB severity. The obtained results indicated that T. harzianum and B. subtilis are very effective biocontrol agents that offer potential benefit in FHB and should be harnessed for further biocontrol applications. The accurate analysis of genetic variation and studies of population structures have significant implications for understanding the genetic traits and disease control programs in wheat. This is the first known report of the distribution and genetic variation of F. graminearum on wheat spikes in Assiut Egypt.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; FHB; Fusarium graminearum; SRAP; Trichoderma harzianum; biocontrol
Year: 2016 PMID: 27147934 PMCID: PMC4853104 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2015.0201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Sequences of the SRAP primers and 16 primer combinations used to amplify F. graminearum genomic DNA
| No | Primer combination | Forward primer | Reverse primer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Name | Primer sequence 5′–3′ | Name | Primer sequence 5′–3′ | ||
| 1 | Em1- Me2 | Me2 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA GC | Em1 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT AAT |
| 2 | Em2- Me3 | Me3 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AT | Em2 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT TGC |
| 3 | Em2- Me4 | Me4 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CC | Em2 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT TGC |
| 4 | Em2- Me6 | Me6 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CA | Em2 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT TGC |
| 5 | Em3- Me3 | Me3 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AT | Em3 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT GAC |
| 6 | Em3- Me6 | Me6 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CA | Em3 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT GAC |
| 7 | Em3- Me4 | Me4 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CC | Em3 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT GAC |
| 8 | Em3- Me10 | Me10 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AA | Em3 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT GAC |
| 9 | Em5- Me10 | Me10 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AA | Em5 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT AAC |
| 10 | Em6- Me4 | Me4 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CC | Em6 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT GCA |
| 11 | Em11- Me3 | Me3 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AT | Em11 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT CTA |
| 12 | Em11- Me4 | Me4 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CC | Em11 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT CTA |
| 13 | Em11- Me6 | Me6 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CA | Em11 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT CTA |
| 14 | Em11- Me8 | Me8 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CT | Em11 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT CTA |
| 15 | Em14- Me3 | Me3 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA AT | Em14 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT.CTT |
| 16 | Em14- Me4 | Me4 | TGA GTC CAA ACC GGA CC | Em14 | GAC TGC GTA CGA ATT.CTT |
Pathogenicity tests of F. graminearum isolates on wheat (Sakha-69) under greenhouse conditions
| Isolates No | Geographical origin of isolates | Diseased spikelets (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | 68.00 F | |
| 62.75 G | ||
| 73.25 E | ||
| 75.50 E | ||
| 79.50 CD | ||
|
| ||
| Group B | 84.50 B | |
| 78.25 D | ||
| 92.50 A | ||
| 81.00 C | ||
| 78.50 CD | ||
|
| ||
| Group C | 56.50 H | |
| 54.25 H | ||
|
| ||
| Uninfected control | 0.0 I | |
Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) based on LSD.
Fig. 1Dendogram showing genetic relatedness among F. graminearum isolates based on SRAP analysis.
Similarity matrix of F. graminearum isolates (Jaccard’s Coefficient)
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| 0.963 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 0.893 | 0.926 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 0.867 | 0.833 | 0.774 | 1 | |||||||||
| 0.758 | 0.781 | 0.781 | 0.875 | 1 | ||||||||
| 0.462 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.475 | 0.488 | 1 | |||||||
| 0.512 | 0.488 | 0.488 | 0.561 | 0.571 | 0.667 | 1 | ||||||
| 0.462 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.513 | 0.525 | 0.818 | 0.667 | 1 | |||||
| 0.514 | 0.486 | 0.486 | 0.487 | 0.429 | 0.639 | 0.778 | 0.639 | 1 | ||||
| 0.556 | 0.528 | 0.528 | 0.526 | 0.463 | 0.595 | 0.778 | 0.595 | 0.871 | 1 | |||
| 0.594 | 0.613 | 0.613 | 0.606 | 0.571 | 0.588 | 0.595 | 0.588 | 0.606 | 0.559 | 1 | ||
| 0.588 | 0.606 | 0.606 | 0.647 | 0.611 | 0.583 | 0.59 | 0.541 | 0.556 | 0.556 | 0.889 | 1 |
Morphological and physiological characteristics of bacterial isolates
| Characteristics | Reaction of isolates: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shape of cell | Rods |
| 2 | Motility | +Ve |
| 3 | Gram staining | +Ve |
| 4 | Endospore production | +Ve |
| 5 | Hydrolysis of casein | +Ve |
| 6 | Gelatin liquefaction | +Ve |
| 7 | Urea test | −Ve |
| 8 | Nitrate reduction | +Ve |
| 9 | Starch hydrolysis | +Ve |
| 10 | Levan production | −Ve |
| 11 | Catalase test | +Ve |
| 12 | Indole formation | −Ve |
| 13 | Esculin hydrolysis | +Ve |
| 14 | Anaerobic growth | −Ve |
| 15 | Methyl red test | +Ve |
| 16 | Oxidase | −Ve |
| 17 | Acid from: D- Glucose | +Ve |
| L- Arabinose | +Ve | |
| D- Xylose | +Ve | |
| D- Mannitol | +Ve | |
| 18 | Growth at pH: | |
| 6.8 | +Ve | |
| 5.7 | +Ve | |
| 19 | Growth in NaCl: 2.0% | +Ve |
| 5.0% | +Ve | |
| 7.0% | +Ve | |
| 10.0% | −Ve | |
| 20 | Growth at: 5.0°C | −Ve |
| 10°C | +Ve | |
| 30°C | +Ve | |
| 40°C | +Ve | |
| 50°C | −Ve |
Legend: −Ve = Negative reaction; +Ve = positive reaction
Effect of T. harzianum and B. subtilis on colony diameter of F. graminearum in dual culture
| Treatments | Antagonism class | Colony diameter of | Inhibition of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 4.37 EF | 51.38 | |
| 1.7 | 4.55 DE | 49.44 | |
| 1.0 | 3.12 I | 65.27 | |
| 1.5 | 3.30 HI | 63.33 | |
| 1.2 | 3.60 GH | 60.00 | |
| 1.7 | 4.85 BCD | 46.11 | |
| 2.0 | 4.60 CDE | 48.88 | |
| - | 4.95 BCD | 45.00 | |
| - | 4.05 FG | 55.00 | |
| - | 4.80 BCDE | 46.66 | |
| - | 5.05 BC | 43.88 | |
| - | 5.15 B | 42.77 | |
| Control | - | 9.0 A | 0.0 |
Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) based on LSD: F.g.= F. graminearum; T.h.= T. harzianum; B.s.= B. subtilis.
Influence of T. harzianum and B. subtilis on FHB incited by F. graminearum on wheat cultivar Sakha-69 under greenhouse conditions
| Treatments | Diseased spikelets (%) | Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 41.00 C | 55.06 | |
| 57.75 B | 36.71 | |
| 91.25 A | 0.0 | |
| Uninfected control | 0.0 D | - |
Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) based on LSD: F.g.= F. graminearum; T.h.= T. harzianum; B.s.= B. subtilis.