Literature DB >> 27147539

Statistical analysis of structural determinants for protein-DNA-binding specificity.

Rosario I Corona1, Jun-Tao Guo1.   

Abstract

DNA-binding proteins play critical roles in biological processes including gene expression, DNA packaging and DNA repair. They bind to DNA target sequences with different degrees of binding specificity, ranging from highly specific (HS) to nonspecific (NS). Alterations of DNA-binding specificity, due to either genetic variation or somatic mutations, can lead to various diseases. In this study, a comparative analysis of protein-DNA complex structures was carried out to investigate the structural features that contribute to binding specificity. Protein-DNA complexes were grouped into three general classes based on degrees of binding specificity: HS, multispecific (MS), and NS. Our results show a clear trend of structural features among the three classes, including amino acid binding propensities, simple and complex hydrogen bonds, major/minor groove and base contacts, and DNA shape. We found that aspartate is enriched in HS DNA binding proteins and predominately binds to a cytosine through a single hydrogen bond or two consecutive cytosines through bidentate hydrogen bonds. Aromatic residues, histidine and tyrosine, are highly enriched in the HS and MS groups and may contribute to specific binding through different mechanisms. To further investigate the role of protein flexibility in specific protein-DNA recognition, we analyzed the conformational changes between the bound and unbound states of DNA-binding proteins and structural variations. The results indicate that HS and MS DNA-binding domains have larger conformational changes upon DNA-binding and larger degree of flexibility in both bound and unbound states. Proteins 2016; 84:1147-1161.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA shape; aromatic residue; aspartate; conformational changes; flexibility; hydrogen bond; structural variations; transcription factor; π-interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147539      PMCID: PMC4945413          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  66 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Tumor-associated zinc finger mutations in the CTCF transcription factor selectively alter tts DNA-binding specificity.

Authors:  Galina N Filippova; Chen-Feng Qi; Jonathan E Ulmer; James M Moore; Michael D Ward; Ying J Hu; Dmitri I Loukinov; Elena M Pugacheva; Elena M Klenova; Paul E Grundy; Andrew P Feinberg; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Elna W Moerland; Cees J Cornelisse; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Akira Komiya; Annika Lindblom; Françoise Dorion-Bonnet; Paul E Neiman; Herbert C Morse; Steven J Collins; Victor V Lobanenkov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Carbohydrate-aromatic interactions.

Authors:  Juan Luis Asensio; Ana Ardá; Francisco Javier Cañada; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 4.  Transcription-factor mutations and disease.

Authors:  D S Latchman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Christian M Beausejour; Jeremy M Rock; Sheldon Augustus; Andrew C Jamieson; Matthew H Porteus; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An all-atom knowledge-based energy function for protein-DNA threading, docking decoy discrimination, and prediction of transcription-factor binding profiles.

Authors:  Beisi Xu; Yuedong Yang; Haojun Liang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-15

7.  Comprehensive computational design of mCreI homing endonuclease cleavage specificity for genome engineering.

Authors:  Umut Y Ulge; David A Baker; Raymond J Monnat
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights.

Authors:  Raluca Gordân; Kevin F Murphy; Rachel P McCord; Cong Zhu; Anastasia Vedenko; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  JASPAR 2016: a major expansion and update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles.

Authors:  Anthony Mathelier; Oriol Fornes; David J Arenillas; Chih-Yu Chen; Grégoire Denay; Jessica Lee; Wenqiang Shi; Casper Shyr; Ge Tan; Rebecca Worsley-Hunt; Allen W Zhang; François Parcy; Boris Lenhard; Albin Sandelin; Wyeth W Wasserman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Structural and functional dissection of differentially expressed tomato WRKY transcripts in host defense response against the vascular wilt pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici).

Authors:  Mohd Aamir; Vinay Kumar Singh; Manish Kumar Dubey; Sarvesh Pratap Kashyap; Andleeb Zehra; Ram Sanmukh Upadhyay; Surendra Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Structural changes in DNA-binding proteins on complexation.

Authors:  Sayan Poddar; Devlina Chakravarty; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A comparative study of protein-ssDNA interactions.

Authors:  Maoxuan Lin; Fareeha K Malik; Jun-Tao Guo
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-02-23

4.  Structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding specificity using an integrative energy function.

Authors:  Alvin Farrel; Jonathan Murphy; Jun-Tao Guo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The molecular basis of FimT-mediated DNA uptake during bacterial natural transformation.

Authors:  Stefanie Holz; Matthew J M Stedman; Sebastian A G Braus; Francesca L Short; Alvar D Gossert; Manuela K Hospenthal
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Insights into protein-DNA interactions from hydrogen bond energy-based comparative protein-ligand analyses.

Authors:  Fareeha K Malik; Jun-Tao Guo
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 7.  Single-Stranded DNA Binding Proteins and Their Identification Using Machine Learning-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Jun-Tao Guo; Fareeha Malik
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-26

8.  ProDFace: A web-tool for the dissection of protein-DNA interfaces.

Authors:  Arumay Pal; Pinak Chakrabarti; Sucharita Dey
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-09-06

9.  DNAproDB: an interactive tool for structural analysis of DNA-protein complexes.

Authors:  Jared M Sagendorf; Helen M Berman; Remo Rohs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  New insights into protein-DNA binding specificity from hydrogen bond based comparative study.

Authors:  Maoxuan Lin; Jun-Tao Guo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.