Literature DB >> 27147506

Radiation therapists' and radiation oncology medical physicists' perceptions of work and the working environment in Australia: a qualitative study.

G K B Halkett1, J McKay2, D G Hegney3,4, Lauren J Breen5, M Berg1, M A Ebert6,7, M Davis8, R Kearvell6.   

Abstract

Workforce recruitment and retention are issues in radiation oncology. The working environment is likely to have an impact on retention; however, there is a lack of research in this area. The objectives of this study were to: investigate radiation therapists' (RTs) and radiation oncology medical physicists' (ROMPs) perceptions of work and the working environment; and determine the factors that influence the ability of RTs and ROMPs to undertake their work and how these factors affect recruitment and retention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and thematic analysis was used. Twenty-eight RTs and 21 ROMPs participated. The overarching themes were delivering care, support in work, working conditions and lifestyle. The overarching themes were mostly consistent across both groups; however, the exemplars reflected the different roles and perspectives of RTs and ROMPs. Participants described the importance they placed on treating patients and improving their lives. Working conditions were sometimes difficult with participants reporting pressure at work, large workloads and longer hours and overtime. Insufficient staff numbers impacted on the effectiveness of staff, the working environment and intentions to stay. Staff satisfaction is likely to be improved if changes are made to the working environment. We make recommendations that may assist departments to support RTs and ROMPs.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  qualitative methods; radiation oncology; workforce; working environment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147506     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  5 in total

1.  Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research.

Authors:  Georgia K B Halkett; Melissa Berg; Martin A Ebert; David Cutt; Michael Davis; Desley Hegney; Michael House; Michelle Judson; Rachel Kearvell; Michele Krawiec; Leanne Lester; Sharon Maresse; Peter McLoone; Jan McKay
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2017-07-21

2.  Employing positive psychology to improve radiation therapy workplace culture.

Authors:  Darren Hunter; Caroline Wright; Sue Pearson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Improving Cognitive Workload in Radiation Therapists: A Pilot EEG Neurofeedback Study.

Authors:  Alana M Campbell; Matthew Mattoni; Mae Nicopolis Yefimov; Karthik Adapa; Lukasz M Mazur
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-03

4.  The sustainability of the New Zealand radiation therapy workforce: Factors that influence intent to leave the workplace and profession.

Authors:  Michael R Taylor; John G Oetzel
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04

5.  Exploring the impact and experience of fractional work in medicine: a qualitative study of medical oncologists in Australia.

Authors:  Emma Kirby; Alex Broom; Deme Karikios; Rosemary Harrup; Zarnie Lwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.