Literature DB >> 27147316

Statistical-learning strategies generate only modestly performing predictive models for urinary symptoms following external beam radiotherapy of the prostate: A comparison of conventional and machine-learning methods.

Noorazrul Yahya1, Martin A Ebert2, Max Bulsara3, Michael J House4, Angel Kennedy5, David J Joseph6, James W Denham7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the paucity of available data concerning radiotherapy-induced urinary toxicity, it is important to ensure derivation of the most robust models with superior predictive performance. This work explores multiple statistical-learning strategies for prediction of urinary symptoms following external beam radiotherapy of the prostate.
METHODS: The performance of logistic regression, elastic-net, support-vector machine, random forest, neural network, and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to predict urinary symptoms was analyzed using data from 754 participants accrued by TROG03.04-RADAR. Predictive features included dose-surface data, comorbidities, and medication-intake. Four symptoms were analyzed: dysuria, haematuria, incontinence, and frequency, each with three definitions (grade ≥ 1, grade ≥ 2 and longitudinal) with event rate between 2.3% and 76.1%. Repeated cross-validations producing matched models were implemented. A synthetic minority oversampling technique was utilized in endpoints with rare events. Parameter optimization was performed on the training data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare performance using sample size to detect differences of ≥0.05 at the 95% confidence level.
RESULTS: Logistic regression, elastic-net, random forest, MARS, and support-vector machine were the highest-performing statistical-learning strategies in 3, 3, 3, 2, and 1 endpoints, respectively. Logistic regression, MARS, elastic-net, random forest, neural network, and support-vector machine were the best, or were not significantly worse than the best, in 7, 7, 5, 5, 3, and 1 endpoints. The best-performing statistical model was for dysuria grade ≥ 1 with AUROC ± standard deviation of 0.649 ± 0.074 using MARS. For longitudinal frequency and dysuria grade ≥ 1, all strategies produced AUROC>0.6 while all haematuria endpoints and longitudinal incontinence models produced AUROC<0.6.
CONCLUSIONS: Logistic regression and MARS were most likely to be the best-performing strategy for the prediction of urinary symptoms with elastic-net and random forest producing competitive results. The predictive power of the models was modest and endpoint-dependent. New features, including spatial dose maps, may be necessary to achieve better models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27147316     DOI: 10.1118/1.4944738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

Review 1.  Internet-based computer technology on radiotherapy.

Authors:  James C L Chow
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-09-08

2.  Derivation and validation of different machine-learning models in mortality prediction of trauma in motorcycle riders: a cross-sectional retrospective study in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Pao-Jen Kuo; Shao-Chun Wu; Peng-Chen Chien; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Artificial neural network approach to predict surgical site infection after free-flap reconstruction in patients receiving surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Pao-Jen Kuo; Shao-Chun Wu; Peng-Chen Chien; Shu-Shya Chang; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Hsueh-Ling Tai; Shu-Hui Peng; Yi-Chun Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-09

4.  Comparison of Models for the Prediction of Medical Costs of Spinal Fusion in Taiwan Diagnosis-Related Groups by Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Ching-Yen Kuo; Liang-Chin Yu; Hou-Chaung Chen; Chien-Lung Chan
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Mortality prediction in patients with isolated moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning models.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Pao-Jen Kuo; Peng-Chen Chien; Chun-Ying Huang; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Machine Learning Models of Survival Prediction in Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Jung-Fang Chuang; Chun-Ying Huang; Hang-Tsung Liu; Peng-Chen Chien; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods.

Authors:  Lucy M Bull; Mark Lunt; Glen P Martin; Kimme Hyrich; Jamie C Sergeant
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2020-07-09

8.  Predicting hospital and emergency department utilization among community-dwelling older adults: Statistical and machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Aaron Jones; Andrew P Costa; Angelina Pesevski; Paul D McNicholas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.