Literature DB >> 2714719

Two-year drinking-water study of formaldehyde in rats.

H P Til1, R A Woutersen, V J Feron, V H Hollanders, H E Falke, J J Clary.   

Abstract

Formaldehyde was administered in the drinking-water to groups of 70 male and 70 female Wistar rats for up to 24 months. Survivors of subgroups of ten rats/sex/group each were killed after 12 or 18 months. The mean formaldehyde doses administered were 0, 1.2, 15 or 82 mg/kg body weight/day for males, and 0, 1.8, 21 or 109 mg/kg/day for females. There were no adverse effects on general health, survival or haematological or clinical chemistry parameters. Body weight and food intake were decreased in the high-dose group. Liquid intake was decreased by 40% in the high-dose group in both sexes in comparison with the controls. There was a slight temporary increase in the density of urine, whereas there was a tendency towards lower urine production in the high-dose group. The relative kidney weights were increased in the high-dose females. Gross examination at autopsy revealed a raised and thickened limiting ridge of the forestomach in most high-dose rats. In addition, several rats in the high-dose group showed irregular mucosal thickenings in the fore- and/or glandular stomach. Treatment-related histopathological gastric changes seen in most of the animals of the high-dose group included papillary epithelial hyperplasia frequently accompanied by hyperkeratosis and focal ulceration in the forestomach and focal chronic atrophic gastritis, occasionally accompanied by ulceration and/or glandular hyperplasia, in the glandular stomach. A higher incidence and/or degree of renal papillary necrosis occurred in the high-dose rats. From this study it appeared that the 'no-observed-adverse-effect level' of formaldehyde was 15 and 21 mg/kg body weight/day for male and female rats, respectively. Oral administration of formaldehyde at doses of 82 and 109 mg/kg/day to male and female rats, respectively, caused severe damage to the gastric mucosa but did not result in gastric tumours or tumours at other sites. The study did not provide any evidence of carcinogenicity of formaldehyde after oral administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2714719     DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(89)90001-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  12 in total

1.  Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards.

Authors:  Robert Golden
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Is exposure to formaldehyde in air causally associated with leukemia?--A hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence analysis.

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Lisa A Bailey; Julie E Goodman; Ali K Hamade; David Mayfield
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Safety and efficacy of methenamine hippurate for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in adult renal transplant recipients: A single center, retrospective study.

Authors:  Ian Hollyer; Francesca Varias; Bing Ho; Michael G Ison
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 4.  Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Flow cytometric determination of neutrophil respiratory burst activity in workers exposed to formaldehyde.

Authors:  M Lyapina; G Zhelezova; E Petrova; M Boev
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Meeting report: summary of IARC monographs on formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol.

Authors:  Vincent James Cogliano; Yann Grosse; Robert A Baan; Kurt Straif; Marie Béatrice Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Sixth plot of the carcinogenic potency database: results of animal bioassays published in the General Literature 1989 to 1990 and by the National Toxicology Program 1990 to 1993.

Authors:  L S Gold; N B Manley; T H Slone; G B Garfinkel; B N Ames; L Rohrbach; B R Stern; K Chow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  G A Boorman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Upper respiratory tract tumors in Cpb:WU (Wistar random) rats.

Authors:  V J Feron; R A Woutersen; A van Garderen-Hoetmer; H C Dreef-van der Meulen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Scientific considerations for evaluating cancer bioassays conducted by the Ramazzini Institute.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Gift; Jane C Caldwell; Jennifer Jinot; Marina V Evans; Ila Cote; John J Vandenberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.