Lidewij Schipper1, Gertjan van Dijk2, Laus M Broersen3, Maarten Loos4, Nana Bartke3, Anton Jw Scheurink2, Eline M van der Beek3. 1. Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, Netherlands; lidewij.schipper@danone.com. 2. Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; and. 3. Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, Netherlands; 4. Sylics (Synaptologics BV), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infant cognitive development can be positively influenced by breastfeeding rather than formula feeding. The composition of breast milk, especially lipid quality, and the duration of breastfeeding have been linked to this effect. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the physical properties and composition of lipid droplets in milk may contribute to cognitive development. METHODS: From postnatal day (P) 16 to P44, healthy male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice were fed either a control or a concept rodent diet, in which the dietary lipid droplets were large and coated with milk phospholipids, resembling more closely the physical properties and composition of breast milk lipids. Thereafter, all mice were fed an AIN-93M semisynthetic rodent diet. The mice were subjected to various cognitive tests during adolescence (P35-P44) and adulthood (P70-P101). On P102, mice were killed and brain phospholipids were analyzed. RESULTS: The concept diet improved performance in short-term memory tasks that rely on novelty exploration during adolescence (T-maze; spontaneous alternation 87% in concept-fed mice compared with 74% in mice fed control diet; P < 0.05) and adulthood (novel object recognition; preference index 0.48 in concept-fed mice compared with 0.05 in control-fed mice; P < 0.05). Cognitive performance in long-term memory tasks, however, was unaffected by diet. Brain phospholipid composition at P102 was not different between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to a diet with lipids mimicking more closely the structure and composition of lipids in breast milk improved specific cognitive behaviors in mice. These data suggest that lipid structure should be considered as a relevant target to improve dietary lipid quality in infant milk formulas.
BACKGROUND:Infant cognitive development can be positively influenced by breastfeeding rather than formula feeding. The composition of breast milk, especially lipid quality, and the duration of breastfeeding have been linked to this effect. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the physical properties and composition of lipid droplets in milk may contribute to cognitive development. METHODS: From postnatal day (P) 16 to P44, healthy male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice were fed either a control or a concept rodent diet, in which the dietary lipid droplets were large and coated with milk phospholipids, resembling more closely the physical properties and composition of breast milk lipids. Thereafter, all mice were fed an AIN-93M semisynthetic rodent diet. The mice were subjected to various cognitive tests during adolescence (P35-P44) and adulthood (P70-P101). On P102, mice were killed and brain phospholipids were analyzed. RESULTS: The concept diet improved performance in short-term memory tasks that rely on novelty exploration during adolescence (T-maze; spontaneous alternation 87% in concept-fed mice compared with 74% in mice fed control diet; P < 0.05) and adulthood (novel object recognition; preference index 0.48 in concept-fed mice compared with 0.05 in control-fed mice; P < 0.05). Cognitive performance in long-term memory tasks, however, was unaffected by diet. Brain phospholipid composition at P102 was not different between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to a diet with lipids mimicking more closely the structure and composition of lipids in breast milk improved specific cognitive behaviors in mice. These data suggest that lipid structure should be considered as a relevant target to improve dietary lipid quality in infant milk formulas.
Authors: Laura M Breij; Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld; Yvan Vandenplas; Sabine N J Jespers; Amerik C de Mol; Poh Choo Khoo; Masendu Kalenga; Stefaan Peeters; Ron H T van Beek; Obbe F Norbruis; Stefanie Schoen; Dennis Acton; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Nicole L Henriksen; Karoline Aasmul-Olsen; Ramakrishnan Venkatasubramanian; Mikkel K E Nygaard; Richard R Sprenger; Anne B Heckmann; Marie S Ostenfeld; Christer S Ejsing; Simon F Eskildsen; Anette Müllertz; Per T Sangild; Stine B Bering; Thomas Thymann Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Steffen van Heijningen; Giorgio Karapetsas; Eline M van der Beek; Gertjan van Dijk; Lidewij Schipper Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Maralinde R Abbink; Lidewij Schipper; Eva F G Naninck; Cato M H de Vos; Romy Meier; Eline M van der Beek; Paul J Lucassen; Aniko Korosi Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Oon Hoe Teoh; Tan Pih Lin; Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld; Antoinette Winokan; Yap Seng Chong; Fabian Yap; Maya Marintcheva-Petrova; Eline M van der Beek; Lynette P Shek Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.717