K I Afrashtehfar1, H Eimar2, R Yassine3, S Abi-Nader1,3, F Tamimi1,3. 1. Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 3. Undergraduate Dental Clinics, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) can help provide the best treatment option for every patient, however, its implementation in restorative dentistry is very limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the barriers preventing the implementation of EBD among dental undergraduate and graduate students in Montreal, and explore possible solutions to overcome these barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by means of a paper format self-administrated questionnaire distributed among dental students. The survey assessed the barriers and potential solutions for implementation of an evidence-based practice. RESULTS: Sixty-one students completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of respondents found evidence-based literature to be the most reliable source of information for restorative treatment planning, however, only 16% used it. They considered that finding reliable information was difficult and they sometimes encountered conflicting information when consulting different sources. Dental students had positive attitudes towards the need for better access to evidence-based literature to assist learning and decision making in restorative treatment planning and to improve treatment outcomes. Even for dentists trained in EBD, online searching takes too much time, and even though it can provide information of better quality than personal intuition, it might not be enough to identify the best available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Even though dental students are aware of the importance of EBD in restorative dentistry they rarely apply the concept, mainly due to time constraints. For this reason, implementation of EBD would probably require faster access to evidence-based knowledge.
INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based dentistry (EBD) can help provide the best treatment option for every patient, however, its implementation in restorative dentistry is very limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the barriers preventing the implementation of EBD among dental undergraduate and graduate students in Montreal, and explore possible solutions to overcome these barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by means of a paper format self-administrated questionnaire distributed among dental students. The survey assessed the barriers and potential solutions for implementation of an evidence-based practice. RESULTS: Sixty-one students completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of respondents found evidence-based literature to be the most reliable source of information for restorative treatment planning, however, only 16% used it. They considered that finding reliable information was difficult and they sometimes encountered conflicting information when consulting different sources. Dental students had positive attitudes towards the need for better access to evidence-based literature to assist learning and decision making in restorative treatment planning and to improve treatment outcomes. Even for dentists trained in EBD, online searching takes too much time, and even though it can provide information of better quality than personal intuition, it might not be enough to identify the best available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Even though dental students are aware of the importance of EBD in restorative dentistry they rarely apply the concept, mainly due to time constraints. For this reason, implementation of EBD would probably require faster access to evidence-based knowledge.
Authors: Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Alexandra E S Thomson; Alan Slootsky; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: J Prosthodont Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Kacper Nijakowski; Dawid Gruszczyński; Kacper Łaganowski; Jagoda Furmańczak; Alicja Brożek; Marcin Nowicki; Dorota Formanowicz; Anna Surdacka Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Deepak Nallaswamy Veeraiyan; Sheeja S Varghese; Arvina Rajasekar; Mohmed Isaqali Karobari; Lakshmi Thangavelu; Anand Marya; Pietro Messina; Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.390