Literature DB >> 27146701

Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures.

B R Chrcanovic1, J Kisch2, T Albrektsson3, A Wennerberg4.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the influence of local and systemic factors on the occurrence of dental implant failures up to the second-stage surgery (abutment connection). This retrospective study is based on 2,670 patients who received 10,096 implants and were consecutively treated with implant-supported prostheses between 1980 and 2014 at 1 specialist clinic. Several anatomic-, patient-, health-, and implant-related factors were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patients and implants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used at the patient level as well as the implant level to evaluate the effect of explanatory variables on the failure of implants up to abutment connection. A generalized estimating equation method was used for the implant-level analysis to account for the fact that repeated observations (several implants) were available for a single patient. Overall, 642 implants (6.36%) failed, of which 176 (1.74%) in 139 patients were lost up to second-stage surgery. The distribution of implants in sites of different bone quantities and qualities was quite similar between implants lost up to and after abutment connection. Smoking and the intake of antidepressants were the statistically significant predictors in the multivariate model (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02369562). © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse effects; endosseous dental implantation; multivariate analysis; osseointegration; survival rate; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146701     DOI: 10.1177/0022034516646098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  46 in total

1.  Effects of multiple implantations of titanium healing abutments: Surface characteristics and microbial colonization.

Authors:  Sanjana S Jain; Sareda T J Schramm; Danyal A Siddiqui; Wenwen Huo; Kelli L Palmer; Thomas G Wilson; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  [Criteria for success in dental implants].

Authors:  Yi Man; Hai-Yang Yu; Zuo-Lin Wang; Yao Wu; Bang-Cheng Yang; Lei Cheng; Xue-Dong Zhou; Yao Sun
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Factors influencing early dental implant failures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Bioengineered Tooth Buds Exhibit Features of Natural Tooth Buds.

Authors:  E E Smith; S Angstadt; N Monteiro; W Zhang; A Khademhosseini; P C Yelick
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Bioengineering Tooth Bud Constructs Using GelMA Hydrogel.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Smith; Pamela C Yelick
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

6.  The Osteogenetic Potential of Chitosan Coated Implant: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Banna M Alnufaiy; Rhodanne Nicole A Lambarte; Khalid S Al-Hamdan
Journal:  J Stem Cells Regen Med       Date:  2020-12-11

7.  Mammalian cell response and bacterial adhesion on titanium healing abutments: effect of multiple implantation and sterilization cycles.

Authors:  Sanjana S Jain; Danyal A Siddiqui; Sutton E Wheelis; Kelli L Palmer; Thomas G Wilson; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Peri-Implant Behavior of Tissue Level Dental Implants with a Convergent Neck.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Irene Bermúdez-Mulet; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rocío Marco-Pitarch; Marina García-Selva; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Raquel León-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16

10.  Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyeong Gi Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim; Il-Hyung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.