Literature DB >> 27146587

Risk prediction for local versus regional/metastatic tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis treated by lumpectomy.

Annette M Molinaro1, Jennette D Sison2, Britt-Marie Ljung3, Thea D Tlsty4, Karla Kerlikowske5,6.   

Abstract

Among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), we identified factors associated with local invasive cancer (LIC) and regional/metastatic invasive cancer (RMIC) and provide 10-year risks based on clinically relevant factors. We created a retrospective, population-based cohort of 1492 women with an initial diagnosis of DCIS (1983-1996) treated by lumpectomy alone. Histological and molecular markers (Ki67, ER, PR, COX-2, p16, ERBB2) were collected on DCIS cases with a subsequent tumor (DCIS, LIC, or RMIC) and a subsample of frequency-matched controls without subsequent tumors. Competing risks methods were used to identify factors associated with LIC and RMIC and cumulative incidence methods to estimate 10-year risks for combinations of factors. Median follow-up time was 12.6 years (range 0.5-29.5 years). The overall 10-year risk of LIC (11.9 %) was higher than for RMIC (3.8 %). About half of women with initial DCIS lesions are detected by mammography and p16 negative and have a 10-year risk of LIC of 6.2 % (95 % CI 5.8-6.8 %) and RMIC of 1.2 % (95 % CI 1.1-1.3 %). Premenopausal women whose DCIS lesion was p16 positive or p16 negative and detected by palpation had high 10-year risk of LIC of 23.0 % (95 % CI 19.3-27.4 %). Ten-year risk of RMIC was highest at 22.5 % (95 % CI 13.8-48.1 %) for those positive for p16, COX-2, and ERRB2, and negative for ER, but prevalence of this group is low at 3 %. Ten-year risk of LIC and RMIC is low for the majority diagnosed with DCIS. Combinations of molecular markers and method of detection of initial DCIS lesion can differentiate women at low and high risk of LIC and RMIC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ductal carcinoma in situ; Local invasive cancer; Recurrence; Regional/metastatic invasive cancer; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146587      PMCID: PMC6805143          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3814-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

1.  The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ--the price of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  When is good enough really good enough? Defining the role of radiation in low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data?

Authors:  M S Pepe; M Mori
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  partDSA: deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for partitioning the covariate space in prediction.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Karen Lostritto; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive, triple-negative, and HER2-neu overexpressing breast cancer among women 20-44 years of age.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Elisabeth F Beaber; Mei-Tzu Chen Tang; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Yiwey Shieh; Ian Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette Molinaro; Imok Cha; Britt-Marie Ljung; Virginia L Ernster; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Dan H Moore; Fred Waldman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Outcomes in patients treated with mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Dawn Owen; Scott Tyldesley; Cheryl Alexander; Caroline Speers; Pauline Truong; Alan Nichol; Elaine S Wai
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin; Robert Gray; Frederick L Baehner; Steven M Butler; Lorie L Hughes; Carl Yoshizawa; Diana B Cherbavaz; Steven Shak; David L Page; George W Sledge; Nancy E Davidson; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; William C Wood; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil Badve
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K Stout; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Elizabeth S Burnside; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  NY-ESO-1 expression in DCIS: A new predictor of good prognosis.

Authors:  R Charles Coombes; Otavia L Caballero; Sami Shousha; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Laura Woodley-Barker; Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi; A Munro Neville
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2017-04-28

3.  Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Christine Desmedt; Jelle Wesseling; Mathilde M M Almekinders; Michael Schaapveld; Bram Thijssen; Lindy L Visser; Tycho Bismeijer; Joyce Sanders; Edoardo Isnaldi; Ingrid Hofland; Marjolijn Mertz; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Annegien Broeks; Erik Hooijberg; Wilbert Zwart; Esther H Lips
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  Elevated NRAS expression during DCIS is a potential driver for progression to basal-like properties and local invasiveness.

Authors:  Ze-Yi Zheng; Hanan Elsarraj; Fariba Behbod; Eric C Chang; Jonathan T Lei; Yan Hong; Meenakshi Anurag; Long Feng; Hilda Kennedy; Yichao Shen; Flora Lo; Zifan Zhao; Bing Zhang; Xiang H-F Zhang; Ossama W Tawfik
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 8.408

Review 5.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Biology, Biomarkers, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.