| Literature DB >> 27146407 |
Veronique Beauloye1, Gwenaelle Diene2, Renske Kuppens3,4, Francis Zech5, Coralie Winandy6, Catherine Molinas2,7,8, Sandy Faye2,7, Isabelle Kieffer2,7, Dominique Beckers9, Ricard Nergårdh10, Berthold Hauffa11, Christine Derycke12, Patrick Delhanty13, Anita Hokken-Koelega3,4, Maithé Tauber2,7,8,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder with different nutritional phases from suckling deficit with failure to thrive to early onset of obesity. Hyperghrelinemia has been described in PWS long before the development of obesity. Ghrelin is found in both acylated (AG) and unacylated (UAG) forms in the circulation. In contrast to AG, UAG has been shown to inhibit food intake and to be elevated in anorexia nervosa. The present project is aiming to determine the underlying mechanisms driving the different nutritional phases in PWS.Entities:
Keywords: Anorexia; Ghrelin; Infants; Nutrition; Obesity; Prader-Willi syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27146407 PMCID: PMC4855494 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0440-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Description of the population
| PWS ( | Controls ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| At birth | |||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 37.5 (36.0;39.0) | 39.5 (39.0;39.5) | 0.008 |
| Caesarean delivery (%) | 67 % | 28 % | <0.0001 |
| Birth length-z-score | −0.85 (−1.08;–0.60) | −0.29 (−0.56;–0.06) | 0.010 |
| Birth weight-z-score | −1.65 (−1.90;–1.31) | −0.26 (−0.50;–0.02) | <0.0001 |
| Breast feeding (%) | 11 %b | 66 % | <0.0001 |
| Duration of breast feeding (days) | 92 (45;151) | 135 (99;167) | NS |
| At inclusion | |||
| Age (years) | 1.8 (1.4;2.3) | 2.0 (1.7;2.2) | NS |
| Sex ratio (% male) | 57 % | 49 % | NS |
| Height-z-score | −0.84 (−1.23;–0.48) | 0.53 (0.25;0.80) | <0.0001 |
| Weight-z-score | −1.06 (−1.49;–0.64) | 0.06 (−0.20;0.35) | <0.0001 |
| BMI-z-score | −0.86 (−1.31;–0.32) | −0.40 (−0.70;–0.10) | NS |
| GH treatment (%) | 68 % | NA | NA |
| Age at start of GH treatment (months) | 13.0 (11.0;15.5) | NA | NA |
| GH dose (mcg/kg/d) | 0.029 (0.027;0.031) | NA | NA |
| IGF-I (ng/ml) | 98 (61;135) | NA | NA |
| Insulin (pg/ml) | 167 (141;194) | 178 (160;196) | NS |
| PWS features | |||
| Age at genetic diagnosis (months) | 1.0 (0.5;2.5) | ||
| Type of genetic diagnosis (%) | |||
| Deletion | 24 % | ||
| Maternal disomy | 51 % | ||
| Translocation | 3 % | ||
| Imprinting defect | 11 % | ||
| Abnormal methylation profile | 11 % | ||
| Nutritional phase at inclusion | |||
| 1a [%−age (months(range))] | 43 %−4 (2;23) | ||
| 1b [%−age (months(range))] | 20 %−29 (11;45) | ||
| 2a [%−age (months(range))] | 23 %−38 (21;46) | ||
| 2b [%−age (months(range))] | 14 %−34 (26;37) | ||
Table 1 gives % or Hodges-Lehmann’s medians and their 95 % confidence interval
Abbreviations: NA Not applicable, NS Not Significant
aDifferences between PWS vs. controls were tested with Mann–Whitney or Chi-square tests
bMother’s milk was given without complete breast feeding to PWS infants
Fig. 1Plotted BMI of the PWS girls a and boys b. Open circles: PWS infants not treated with GH; dark circles: PWS infants treated with GH. When several measures had been taken for one individual, the circles are linked
Fig. 2Acylated (AG) a, unacylated (UAG) b ghrelin levels and AG/UAG ratio c according to age in both groups: red: PWS; blue: control children. Comparative analyses were conducted using linear generalized estimating equations with a common correlation between samples from the same patients, with p-value calculation according to Pan et al. and Chaganty et al. [18, 19]. PWS vs. Controls: p = 0.45 (A), p = 0.0044 (B), p = 0.0056 (C), see Additional file 1: Fig. S1
Fig. 3Unacylated (UAG) ghrelin levels according to age in GH-treated (open circles) and untreated (dark squares) PWS infants. Comparative analyses were conducted using linear generalized estimating equations with a common correlation between samples from the same patients, with p-value calculation according to Pan et al. and Chaganty et al. [18, 19]. UAG in function of age in GH (−) vs. GH (+): p = 0.0015