Literature DB >> 27146334

A test of the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation hypothesis in angiosperm and conifer tree species.

Daniel M Johnson1, Remi Wortemann2, Katherine A McCulloh3, Lionel Jordan-Meille4, Eric Ward5, Jeffrey M Warren6, Sari Palmroth2, Jean-Christophe Domec7.   

Abstract

Water transport from soils to the atmosphere is critical for plant growth and survival. However, we have a limited understanding about many portions of the whole-tree hydraulic pathway, because the vast majority of published information is on terminal branches. Our understanding of mature tree trunk hydraulic physiology, in particular, is limited. The hydraulic vulnerability segmentation hypothesis (HVSH) stipulates that distal portions of the plant (leaves, branches and roots) should be more vulnerable to embolism than trunks, which are nonredundant organs that require a massive carbon investment. In the current study, we compared vulnerability to loss of hydraulic function, leaf and xylem water potentials and the resulting hydraulic safety margins (in relation to the water potential causing 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity) in leaves, branches, trunks and roots of four angiosperms and four conifer tree species. Across all species, our results supported strongly the HVSH as leaves and roots were less resistant to embolism than branches or trunks. However, branches were consistently more resistant to embolism than any other portion of the plant, including trunks. Also, calculated whole-tree vulnerability to hydraulic dysfunction was much greater than vulnerability in branches. This was due to hydraulic dysfunction in roots and leaves at less negative water potentials than those causing branch or trunk dysfunction. Leaves and roots had narrow or negative hydraulic safety margins, but trunks and branches maintained positive safety margins. By using branch-based hydraulic information as a proxy for entire plants, much research has potentially overestimated embolism resistance, and possibly drought tolerance, for many species. This study highlights the necessity to reconsider past conclusions made about plant resistance to drought based on branch xylem only. This study also highlights the necessity for more research of whole-plant hydraulic physiology to better understand strategies of plant drought tolerance and the critical control points within the hydraulic pathway.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cavitation; drought; embolism; transpiration; water relations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146334     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpw031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  21 in total

1.  Mechanical Failure of Fine Root Cortical Cells Initiates Plant Hydraulic Decline during Drought.

Authors:  Italo F Cuneo; Thorsten Knipfer; Craig R Brodersen; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Leaf hydraulic safety margin and safety-efficiency trade-off across angiosperm woody species.

Authors:  Chao-Long Yan; Ming-Yuan Ni; Kun-Fang Cao; Shi-Dan Zhu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The functional implications of tracheary connections across growth rings in four northern hardwood trees.

Authors:  Jay W Wason; Craig R Brodersen; Brett A Huggett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Coordination of hydraulic thresholds across roots, stems, and leaves of two co-occurring mangrove species.

Authors:  Guo-Feng Jiang 蒋国凤; Su-Yuan Li 李溯源; Yi-Chan Li 李艺蝉; Adam B Roddy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.005

5.  Pit characters determine drought-induced embolism resistance of leaf xylem across 18 Neotropical tree species.

Authors:  Sébastien Levionnois; Lucian Kaack; Patrick Heuret; Nina Abel; Camille Ziegler; Sabrina Coste; Clément Stahl; Steven Jansen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 8.005

Review 6.  Catastrophic hydraulic failure and tipping points in plants.

Authors:  Daniel M Johnson; Gabriel Katul; Jean-Christophe Domec
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 7.947

7.  Hydraulic traits of co-existing conifers do not correlate with local hydroclimate condition: a case study in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A.

Authors:  Tim Clute; Justin Martin; Nate Looker; Jia Hu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Co-ordination between leaf biomechanical resistance and hydraulic safety across 30 sub-tropical woody species.

Authors:  Yong-Qiang Wang; Ming-Yuan Ni; Wen-Hao Zeng; Dong-Liu Huang; Wei Xiang; Peng-Cheng He; Qing Ye; Kun-Fang Cao; Shi-Dan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Divergent Hydraulic Safety Strategies in Three Co-occurring Anacardiaceae Tree Species in a Chinese Savanna.

Authors:  Shu-Bin Zhang; Jiao-Lin Zhang; Kun-Fang Cao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Is xylem of angiosperm leaves less resistant to embolism than branches? Insights from microCT, hydraulics, and anatomy.

Authors:  Matthias Klepsch; Ya Zhang; Martyna M Kotowska; Laurent J Lamarque; Markus Nolf; Bernhard Schuldt; José M Torres-Ruiz; De-Wen Qin; Brendan Choat; Sylvain Delzon; Christine Scoffoni; Kun-Fang Cao; Steven Jansen
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.