Literature DB >> 27146215

A synthesis of genetic connectivity in deep-sea fauna and implications for marine reserve design.

Amy R Baco1, Ron J Etter2, Pedro A Ribeiro3,4, Sophie von der Heyden5, Peter Beerli6, Brian P Kinlan7,8.   

Abstract

With anthropogenic impacts rapidly advancing into deeper waters, there is growing interest in establishing deep-sea marine protected areas (MPAs) or reserves. Reserve design depends on estimates of connectivity and scales of dispersal for the taxa of interest. Deep-sea taxa are hypothesized to disperse greater distances than shallow-water taxa, which implies that reserves would need to be larger in size and networks could be more widely spaced; however, this paradigm has not been tested. We compiled population genetic studies of deep-sea fauna and estimated dispersal distances for 51 studies using a method based on isolation-by-distance slopes. Estimates of dispersal distance ranged from 0.24 km to 2028 km with a geometric mean of 33.2 km and differed in relation to taxonomic and life-history factors as well as several study parameters. Dispersal distances were generally greater for fishes than invertebrates with the Mollusca being the least dispersive sampled phylum. Species that are pelagic as adults were more dispersive than those with sessile or sedentary lifestyles. Benthic species from soft-substrate habitats were generally less dispersive than species from hard substrate, demersal or pelagic habitats. As expected, species with pelagic and/or feeding (planktotrophic) larvae were more dispersive than other larval types. Many of these comparisons were confounded by taxonomic or other life-history differences (e.g. fishes being more dispersive than invertebrates) making any simple interpretation difficult. Our results provide the first rough estimate of the range of dispersal distances in the deep sea and allow comparisons to shallow-water assemblages. Overall, dispersal distances were greater for deeper taxa, although the differences were not large (0.3-0.6 orders of magnitude between means), and imbalanced sampling of shallow and deep taxa complicates any simple interpretation. Our analyses suggest the scales of dispersal and connectivity for reserve design in the deep sea might be comparable to or slightly larger than those in shallow water. Deep-sea reserve design will need to consider the enormous variety of taxa, life histories, hydrodynamics, spatial configuration of habitats and patterns of species distributions. The many caveats of our analyses provide a strong impetus for substantial future efforts to assess connectivity of deep-sea species from a variety of habitats, taxonomic groups and depth zones.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep-sea connectivity; genetic estimates of dispersal distance; isolation-by-distance slope; marine reserves

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146215     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  15 in total

1.  Integrative systematics and ecology of a new deep-sea family of tanaidacean crustaceans.

Authors:  Magdalena Błażewicz; Piotr Jóźwiak; Robert M Jennings; Maciej Studzian; Inmaculada Frutos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Population genetic structure of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) in the Southeast Pacific and Southwest Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Cristian B Canales-Aguirre; Sandra Ferrada-Fuentes; Ricardo Galleguillos; Fernanda X Oyarzun; Cristián E Hernández
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Species replacement dominates megabenthos beta diversity in a remote seamount setting.

Authors:  Lissette Victorero; Katleen Robert; Laura F Robinson; Michelle L Taylor; Veerle A I Huvenne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Mitochondrial DNA is unsuitable to test for isolation by distance.

Authors:  Peter R Teske; Tirupathi Rao Golla; Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo; Arsalan Emami-Khoyi; Carl D van der Lingen; Sophie von der Heyden; Brent Chiazzari; Bettine Jansen van Vuuren; Luciano B Beheregaray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining.

Authors:  Daniel C Dunn; Cindy L Van Dover; Ron J Etter; Craig R Smith; Lisa A Levin; Telmo Morato; Ana Colaço; Andrew C Dale; Andrey V Gebruk; Kristina M Gjerde; Patrick N Halpin; Kerry L Howell; David Johnson; José Angel A Perez; Marta Chantal Ribeiro; Heiko Stuckas; Philip Weaver
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Larval assemblages over the abyssal plain in the Pacific are highly diverse and spatially patchy.

Authors:  Oliver Kersten; Eric W Vetter; Michelle J Jungbluth; Craig R Smith; Erica Goetze
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Chasing genetic structure in coralligenous reef invertebrates: patterns, criticalities and conservation issues.

Authors:  Federica Costantini; Filippo Ferrario; Marco Abbiati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A new predator connecting the abyssal with the hadal in the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench, NW Pacific.

Authors:  Anne-Nina Lörz; Anna Maria Jażdżewska; Angelika Brandt
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Population genetic structure and connectivity of deep-sea stony corals (Order Scleractinia) in the New Zealand region: Implications for the conservation and management of vulnerable marine ecosystems.

Authors:  Cong Zeng; Ashley A Rowden; Malcolm R Clark; Jonathan P A Gardner
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Population genetic structure of the deep-sea mussel Bathymodiolus platifrons (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in the Northwest Pacific.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Jin Sun; Hiromi K Watanabe; Chong Chen; Masako Nakamura; Rubao Ji; Dong Feng; Jia Lv; Shi Wang; Zhenmin Bao; Pei-Yuan Qian; Jian-Wen Qiu
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.