Literature DB >> 27146214

Evaluation of artificial nerve conduit and autografts in peripheral nerve repair in the rat model of sciatic nerve injury.

Rongbo Wu1, Li Wang2, Fangyi Chen1, Yongmei Huang3, Jimin Shi4, Xingfei Zhu1, Yue Ding1, Xinchao Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of artificial nerve conduit in the sciatic nerve injury and repair in the rat model.
METHODS: A total of 60 adult male Sprague Dawley rats were evenly randomized into five groups to build the model of sciatic nerve injury and perform the injury repair experiment. The five groups were: group A which was treated with artificial nerve conduit, group B which was treated with common carotid artery (CCA) autograft, group C which was treated with sciatic nerve autograft, group D which was treated with sham operation, and group E as the normal control. The injury was repaired by direct coaptation of the nerve ends. Postoperatively, the rats' behavior, motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), incubation period, amplitude, remaining rate of wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, the diameter and section area of the gastrocnemius cell, and the histological changes were assessed. The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: Twelve days postoperatively, 36 rats in groups A, B, and C presented with denervated adermotrophia on the injured ankle. The electrophysiological indicators in groups D and E were constant and similar. The values of MNCV and amplitude were group C > group A > group B, with an increasing tendency. The values of the incubation period were group C < group A < group B with statistical difference (p < 0.05) and showed a decreasing tendency. The wet gastrocnemius muscle in groups D and E showed plump morphology with luster and elasticity. Groups A and C had similar atrophic gastrocnemius muscles and reduced flexibility while the phenomena were more severe in group B. Progressive decrease of the cell diameter and sectional area was observed in groups A, B, and C. The adhesion between the sciatic nerve and the surrounding area in groups A, B, and C had statistical significance (P < 0.05), with group B the most serious.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that artificial nerve conduit facilitated functional and morphological regeneration of the nerve. It seemed more effective than CCA but inferior to sciatic nerve autograft in repairing sciatic nerve injury in the rat model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial nerve conduit; Electrophysiology; Gastrocnemius; Peripheral nerve repair; Sciatic nerve injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146214     DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1181346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

1.  3D-printed nerve guidance conduits multi-functionalized with canine multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells promote neuroregeneration after sciatic nerve injury in rats.

Authors:  Diego Noé Rodríguez-Sánchez; Giovana Boff Araujo Pinto; Luciana Politti Cartarozzi; Alexandre Leite Rodrigues de Oliveira; Ana Livia Carvalho Bovolato; Marcio de Carvalho; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Janaina de Andréa Dernowsek; Marjorie Golim; Benedito Barraviera; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Elenice Deffune; Mathues Bertanha; Rogério Martins Amorim
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.832

2.  Comparison of repair of peripheral nerve transection in predegenerated muscle with and without a vein graft.

Authors:  Jamshid Mohammadi; Hamdollah Delaviz; Bahram Mohammadi; Hamoun Delaviz; Parastou Rad
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  Tissue-engineered rhesus monkey nerve grafts for the repair of long ulnar nerve defects: similar outcomes to autologous nerve grafts.

Authors:  Chang-Qing Jiang; Jun Hu; Jian-Ping Xiang; Jia-Kai Zhu; Xiao-Lin Liu; Peng Luo
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 4.  Multiple uses of fibrin sealant for nervous system treatment following injury and disease.

Authors:  Natalia Perussi Biscola; Luciana Politti Cartarozzi; Suzana Ulian-Benitez; Roberta Barbizan; Mateus Vidigal Castro; Aline Barroso Spejo; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Benedito Barraviera; Alexandre Leite Rodrigues Oliveira
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Efficacy evaluation of personalized coaptation in neurotization for motor deficit after peripheral nerve injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  TengDa Qian; Kai Qian; TuoYe Xu; Jing Shi; Tao Ma; ZeWu Song; ChengMing Xu; LiXin Li
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Enhanced Nerve Regeneration by Bionic Conductive Nerve Scaffold Under Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Zhenhui Liu; Yanshi Liu; Maimaiaili Yushan; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Smaniotto; Cristina Pires Camargo; Marcia Saldanha Kubrusly; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.564

8.  Negative Pressure Therapy in the Regeneration of the Sciatic Nerve Using Vacuum - Assisted Closure in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Wu; Zhen-Huan Jiang; Xiao-Jun Feng; Jian-Nong Jiang; Mao-Hua Cheng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-02-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.