Literature DB >> 27146106

3D scanning and printing skeletal tissues for anatomy education.

Daniel B Thomas1, Jessica D Hiscox1, Blair J Dixon2, Johan Potgieter2.   

Abstract

Detailed anatomical models can be produced with consumer-level 3D scanning and printing systems. 3D replication techniques are significant advances for anatomical education as they allow practitioners to more easily introduce diverse or numerous specimens into classrooms. Here we present a methodology for producing anatomical models in-house, with the chondrocranium cartilage from a spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) and the skeleton of a cane toad (Rhinella marina) as case studies. 3D digital replicas were produced using two consumer-level scanners and specimens were 3D-printed with selective laser sintering. The fidelity of the two case study models was determined with respect to key anatomical features. Larger-scale features of the dogfish chondrocranium and frog skeleton were all well-resolved and distinct in the 3D digital models, and many finer-scale features were also well-resolved, but some more subtle features were absent from the digital models (e.g. endolymphatic foramina in chondrocranium). All characters identified in the digital chondrocranium could be identified in the subsequent 3D print; however, three characters in the 3D-printed frog skeleton could not be clearly delimited (palatines, parasphenoid and pubis). Characters that were absent in the digital models or 3D prints had low-relief in the original scanned specimen and represent a minor loss of fidelity. Our method description and case studies show that minimal equipment and training is needed to produce durable skeletal specimens. These technologies support the tailored production of models for specific classes or research aims.
© 2016 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Squalidae; cartilage; dogfish; frog; laser scanning; selective laser sintering; skeleton; structured light scanning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146106      PMCID: PMC4974550          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  13 in total

1.  Variation in the measurement of cranial volume and surface area using 3D laser scanning technology.

Authors:  Sabrina B Sholts; Sebastian K T S Wärmländer; Louise M Flores; Kevin W P Miller; Phillip L Walker
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  A method of developing and introducing case-based learning to a preclinical veterinary curriculum.

Authors:  Emma Crowther; Sarah Baillie
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.

Authors:  Daniel Preece; Sarah B Williams; Richard Lam; Renate Weller
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.

Authors:  Zaid Khot; Kaitlyn Quinlan; Geoffrey R Norman; Bruce Wainman
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology.

Authors:  Paul G McMenamin; Michelle R Quayle; Colin R McHenry; Justin W Adams
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Biological plasticity in penguin heat-retention structures.

Authors:  Daniel B Thomas; R Ewan Fordyce
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Skull preparation using the exzyme-active detergent technique.

Authors:  M P Mooney; E M Kraus; J Bardach; J I Snodgass
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1982-01

8.  Teaching facial fracture repair: A novel method of surgical skills training using three-dimensional biomodels.

Authors:  Neil D'Souza; James Mainprize; Glenn Edwards; Paul Binhammer; Oleh Antonyshyn
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Morphometric analysis of molars in a Middle Pleistocene population shows a mosaic of 'modern' and Neanderthal features.

Authors:  María Martinón-Torres; Petra Spěváčková; Ana Gracia-Téllez; Ignacio Martínez; Emiliano Bruner; Juan Luis Arsuaga; José María Bermúdez de Castro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  The phylogeny of the red panda (Ailurus fulgens): evidence from the hindlimb.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fisher; Brent Adrian; Clay Elrod; Michelle Hicks
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  5 in total

1.  3D models of nonunion fractures in long bones as education tools.

Authors:  Katriny Elifelina Monteiro Rodrigues; Kleber Dos Anjos Lucas; Andrey Luiz Lopes Cordeiro; Romeu Paulo Martins Silva; Francisco Glauco de Araújo Santos; Yuri Karaccas de Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Vet       Date:  2021-05-23

2.  The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited.

Authors:  Eduardo Villalobos-Segura; Giuseppe Marramà; Giorgio Carnevale; Kerin M Claeson; Charlie J Underwood; Gavin J P Naylor; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  Diversity (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Prebending of osteosynthesis plate using 3D printed models to treat symptomatic os acromiale and acromial fracture.

Authors:  Hanne Beliën; Hanne Biesmans; Anny Steenwerckx; Eric Bijnens; Carl Dierickx
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-10-24

4.  A reverse form of Linburg-Comstock variation with comments on its etiology and demonstration of interactive 3D portable document format.

Authors:  Wijittra Prasatkaew; Nutmethee Kruepunga; Laphatrada Yurasakpong; Ratiyakorn Korkong; Somkamon Ardsawang; Sirapatsorn Ronglakorn; Kanit Sananpanich; Siwat Suksri; Athikhun Suwannakhan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Evaluating phone camera and cloud service-based 3D imaging and printing of human bones for anatomical education.

Authors:  Qing-Yun Li; Qi Zhang; Chun Yan; Ye He; Mukuze Phillip; Fang Li; Ai-Hua Pan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.