H M Cheng1,2, S Lo1,2, R Scolyer1,2,3, A Meekings4, G Carlos1,2, P Guitera1,2,5. 1. Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, U.K. 5. Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) can be safely treated topically. Potentially noninvasive imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be useful to diagnose and manage patients with sBCC and obviate the need for biopsy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in OCT (i) the sensitivity and specificity for sBCC diagnosis, (ii) the accuracy in determining BCC depth and (iii) the role in management of sBCC mimickers. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive cohort of lesions for which sBCC was considered in the differential diagnosis. These lesions underwent clinical, dermoscopic and OCT assessment. Diagnosis and its confidence were recorded for each modality and were correlated with the histopathological diagnosis (punch biopsy). Interpretation of the OCT images and assessment of individual features were performed blinded to the biopsy results. RESULTS: In total, 168 lesions were recruited: 52% were sBCC, 26% were other BCC variants and the remaining lesions were actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma in situ, other benign inflammatory processes and two other malignant tumours. The sensitivity and specificity of OCT for diagnosis of sBCC were 0·87 and 0·80, respectively. There was excellent correlation between OCT and biopsy for tumour depth amongst tumours ≤ 0·4 mm (Pearson correlation r = 0·86, P < 0·001), but the correlation was less as depth increased (Pearson correlation r = 0·71, P < 0·001 for all tumours < 1·0 mm). CONCLUSIONS: OCT has good diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing sBCC and measuring depth in tumours ≤ 0·4 mm. Potentially OCT can reduce the need for biopsy in clinically suspected sBCCs. However, careful follow-up is required in such cases as there is a small risk (5%) of misdiagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) can be safely treated topically. Potentially noninvasive imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be useful to diagnose and manage patients with sBCC and obviate the need for biopsy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in OCT (i) the sensitivity and specificity for sBCC diagnosis, (ii) the accuracy in determining BCC depth and (iii) the role in management of sBCC mimickers. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive cohort of lesions for which sBCC was considered in the differential diagnosis. These lesions underwent clinical, dermoscopic and OCT assessment. Diagnosis and its confidence were recorded for each modality and were correlated with the histopathological diagnosis (punch biopsy). Interpretation of the OCT images and assessment of individual features were performed blinded to the biopsy results. RESULTS: In total, 168 lesions were recruited: 52% were sBCC, 26% were other BCC variants and the remaining lesions were actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma in situ, other benign inflammatory processes and two other malignant tumours. The sensitivity and specificity of OCT for diagnosis of sBCC were 0·87 and 0·80, respectively. There was excellent correlation between OCT and biopsy for tumour depth amongst tumours ≤ 0·4 mm (Pearson correlation r = 0·86, P < 0·001), but the correlation was less as depth increased (Pearson correlation r = 0·71, P < 0·001 for all tumours < 1·0 mm). CONCLUSIONS: OCT has good diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing sBCC and measuring depth in tumours ≤ 0·4 mm. Potentially OCT can reduce the need for biopsy in clinically suspected sBCCs. However, careful follow-up is required in such cases as there is a small risk (5%) of misdiagnosis.
Authors: Saud Aleissa; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Miguel Cordova; Aditi Sahu; Stephen W Dusza; William Phillips; Anthony Rossi; Erica Lee; Kishwer S Nehal Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Samantha L Schneider; Indermeet Kohli; Iltefat H Hamzavi; M Laurin Council; Anthony M Rossi; David M Ozog Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Milind Rajadhyaksha; Ashfaq Marghoob; Anthony Rossi; Allan C Halpern; Kishwer S Nehal Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: F Adan; P J Nelemans; N W J Kelleners-Smeets; J P H M Kessels; T Brinkhuizen; K Mosterd Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 11.113
Authors: Eva van Loo; Kelly A E Sinx; Julia Welzel; Sandra Schuh; Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets; Klara Mosterd; Patty J Nelemans Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.875