Literature DB >> 27145810

Smoke and mirrors: unanswered questions and misleading statements obscure the truth about organ sources in China.

Wendy A Rogers1, Torsten Trey2, Maria Fiatarone Singh3, Madeleine Bridgett4, Katrina A Bramstedt5, Jacob Lavee6.   

Abstract

This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coercion; Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues; Killing; Transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27145810     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  A 10-year follow up of publishing ethics in China: what is new and what is unchanged.

Authors:  Katrina A Bramstedt; Jun Xu
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.