Literature DB >> 27144292

Pediatric Posterior Vertebral Column Resection (PVCR): Before and After Ten Years of Age: Greater Than 10-Year Follow-Up.

Dong-Gune Chang1, Jae Hyuk Yang2, Jung-Hee Lee3, Jin-Hyok Kim1, Seung-Woo Suh2, Young-Hoon Kim4, Kee-Yong Ha4, Se-Il Suk1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) and its long-term effects on the deformity correction for congenital scoliosis in children less than 18 years of age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been no reports on surgical outcomes that pertain to the timing of surgery for congenital scoliosis in children under age 18 years with long term follow-up.
METHODS: Forty-five congenital scoliosis patients (N = 45) under age 18 at the time of surgery were treated by PVCR. These cases were retrospectively studied and had a minimum 10-year follow-up. We assigned patients into two groups: Group 1 (N = 19) patients who had surgery before 10 years of age, Group 2 (N = 26) patients who had surgery after 10 years of age.
RESULTS: In Group 1, the mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 44° before surgery, 10.2° after surgery, and 14.2° at last follow-up. In Group 2, the mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 48.7° before surgery, 17.2° after surgery, and 20.4° at the last follow-up. The mean operative time was 189 minutes in Group 1 and 245 minutes in Group 2. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) per kilogram was 52.9 mL/kg in Group 1 and 48.1 mL/kg in Group 2. There were 22 complications for PVCR and the overall prevalence of complications was 48.9%.
CONCLUSION: PVCR is an effective procedure for the management of congenital scoliosis under age 18. PVCR for congenital scoliosis before the age of 10 years had significantly better deformity correction compared with the group after the age of 10 years and did not cause crankshaft phenomenon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27144292     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Multilevel spinal reconstruction in pediatric patients under 4 years old with non-congenital pathology (10-year single-center cohort study).

Authors:  Alexander Yu Mushkin; Denis G Naumov; Valery A Evseev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Congenital spine deformities during growth : Modern concepts of treatment].

Authors:  Ralf Stücker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Revision surgery for curve progression after implant removal following posterior fusion only at a young age in the treatment of congenital scoliosis: A case report.

Authors:  Dong-Gune Chang; Jae Hyuk Yang; Jung-Hee Lee; Jung-Sub Lee; Seung-Woo Suh; Jin-Hyok Kim; Seung-Yeol Oh; Woojin Cho; Jong-Beom Park; Se-Il Suk
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Review of Management Strategies and Role of Spinal Osteotomies.

Authors:  Pankaj Kandwal; Govindaraja Perumal Vijayaraghavan; Upendra Bidre Nagaraja; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15

5.  Fractional curve progression with maintenance of fusion mass in congenital scoliosis: An 18-year follow-up of a case report.

Authors:  Dong-Gune Chang; Jae Hyuk Yang; Se-Il Suk; Seung-Woo Suh; Jin-Hyok Kim; Seung-Joo Lee; Ki-Ho Na; Jung-Hee Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis in children under age 10 years: More than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Dong-Gune Chang; Seung Woo Suh; Woon Kim; Jewel Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.