| Literature DB >> 27144128 |
Albert Boretti1, Stefania Castelletto2.
Abstract
This contribution highlights and compares some recent achievements in the use of k-space and real space imaging (scanning probe and wide-filed microscope techniques), when applied to a luminescent color center in diamond, known as nitrogen vacancy (NV) center. These techniques combined with the optically detected magnetic resonance of NV, provide a unique platform to achieve nanometric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolution of nearby nuclear spins (known as nanoMRI), and nanometric NV real space localization. •Atomic size optically detectable spin probe.•High magnetic field sensitivity and nanometric resolution.•Non-invasive mapping of functional activity in neuronal networks.Entities:
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Nano Fourier magnetic resonance imaging; Nano scale; Neuronal networks; Nitrogen vacancy in diamond; Optical detection; Super-resolution microscopy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27144128 PMCID: PMC4840428 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2016.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1The Nano Fourier Magnetic Imaging Microscope according to Ref. [1]. (a) and (b) are the side view and top view outline of the probe, (c) the NV centre energy level diagram and (d) the imaging sequence. The NV centre magnetic sensors are located near the surface of a diamond chip. A green laser is used to initialize and read out the NV spin states that are coherently manipulated with resonant pulses by using a microwave loop (yellow). The controlled magnetic field gradients for the NV spin phase encoding in k-space are generated by sending currents through pairs of wires (blue). For the principle demonstration an external field wire is used to create a non-uniform DC or AC magnetic field. The NV quantization axis is offset from the surface normal of the diamond sample axis and aligned with a static, uniform magnetic field ≈ 30 G created by a permanent magnet that is not shown in the figure. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Method comparison.
| Methods | Spatial | Dimensions | Acquisition time | Magnetic field sensitivity | Modality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMI | 3.6 | 1D | 20 ms | ∼1.2 | k-space, large FoV |
| FMI | 30 | 2D | 20 ms | Not specified | k-space and hybrid k-space and real space wide-field |
| STED-ODMR | 6 | 1D planar | Real time | unavailable | Real space, Scanning probe |
| 2.4 nm | 1D SIL | Real time | unavailable | ||
| STED | 8 | 2D planar | Real time | unavailable | Real Space, Scanning probe |
| STORM-ODMR | 27 nm | 1D | Post-processing of imaging required | 190 | Real space, Wide-field |
| NV Nanodiamonds | 20 nm | 1D | Post-processing of imaging required | unavailable | Real space, Wide-field |