Literature DB >> 27143732

Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty.

J R Donaldson1, F Tudor1, J Gollish1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) undertaken for stiffness in the absence of sepsis or loosening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the results of revision surgery for stiff TKA in 48 cases (35 (72.9%) women and 13 (27.1%) men). The mean age at revision surgery was 65.5 years (42 to 83). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Stiffness was defined as an arc of flexion of < 70° or a flexion contracture of > 15°. The changes in the range of movement (ROM) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis index scores (WOMAC) were recorded.
RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 59.9 months (12 to 272) there was a mean improvement in arc of movement of 45.0°. Mean flexion improved from 54.4° (5° to 100°) to 90° (10° to 125°) (p < 0.05) and the mean flexion contracture decreased from 12.0° (0° to 45°) to 3.5° (0° to 25°) (p < 0.05). The mean WOMAC scores improved for pain, stiffness and function. In patients with extreme stiffness we describe a novel technique, which we have called the 'sloppy' revision. This entails downsizing the polyethylene insert by 4 mm and using a more constrained liner to retain stability.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of revision surgeries for stiffness reported in the literature where infection and loosening have been excluded. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Whilst revision surgery is technically demanding, improvements in ROM and outcome can be achieved, particularly when the revision is within two years of the primary surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:622-7. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee; arthroplasty; revision; stiffness; range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27143732     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B5.35969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  7 in total

1.  The STAK tool: evaluation of a new device to treat arthrofibrosis and poor range of movement following total knee arthroplasty and major knee surgery.

Authors:  Sara K Aspinall; Patrick C Wheeler; Steven P Godsiff; Sue M Hignett; Daniel T P Fong
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-08-01

2.  Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Kelei Zhai; Weifeng Ma; Tao Huang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

3.  Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Results Over 25 Years.

Authors:  Aaron R Owen; Meagan E Tibbo; Andre J van Wijnen; Mark W Pagnano; Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul J H van Rensch; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Gerjon Hannink; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Flexion contracture due to cyclops lesion after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin A Winston; Jackson Jones; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 6.  The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-10-07

7.  Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison.

Authors:  Michelle R Rauzi; Jared R H Foran; Michael J Bade
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.