| Literature DB >> 27143508 |
Li Gao1, Xiao-Dong Wang2,3, Yang-Yang Niu2,3, Dan-Dan Duan1,4, Xue Yang2,3, Jian Hao2,3, Cui-Hong Zhu2,3, Dan Chen5, Ke-Xin Wang1,4, Xue-Mei Qin1, Xiong-Zhi Wu3,6.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used to treat tumors for years and has been demonstrated to be effective. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of herbs remain unclear. This study aims to ascertain molecular targets of herbs prolonging survival time of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on network pharmacology, and to establish a research method for accurate treatment of TCM. The survival benefit of TCM treatment with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) was proved by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis among 288 patients. The correlation between herbs and survival time was performed by bivariate correlation analysis. Network pharmacology method was utilized to construct the active ingredient-target networks of herbs that were responsible for the beneficial effects against HCC. Cox regression analysis showed CHM was an independent favorable prognostic factor. The median survival time was 13 months and the 5-year overall survival rates were 2.61% in the TCM group, while there were 6 months, 0 in the non-TCM group. Correlation analysis demonstrated that 8 herbs closely associated with prognosis. Network pharmacology analysis revealed that the 8 herbs regulated multiple HCC relative genes, among which the genes affected proliferation (KRAS, AKT2, MAPK), metastasis (SRC, MMP), angiogenesis (PTGS2) and apoptosis (CASP3) etc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27143508 PMCID: PMC4855233 DOI: 10.1038/srep24944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Process overview.
Patients’ baseline characteristics and treatments between TCM group and non-TCM group.
| | TCM | non-TCM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| t Variable | (n = 115) | (n = 173) | ||
| Age | <30 | 1 | 0 | 0.176 |
| 30–40 | 9 | 5 | ||
| 40–50 | 17 | 29 | ||
| 50–60 | 40 | 89 | ||
| 60–70 | 31 | 36 | ||
| >70 | 17 | 14 | ||
| Gender (male/female) | 94/21 | 136/37 | 0.517 | |
| Child-Pugh stage (A/B) | 102/13 | 140/33 | 0.053 | |
| Etiology | Alcohol | 17 | 29 | 0.237 |
| HBV/HCV | 26 | 45 | ||
| HBV/HCV+Alcohol | 6 | 18 | ||
| Cryptogenic | 66 | 81 | ||
| Serum AFP levels (<200μg/L/>200μg/L) | 88/27 | 126/47 | 0.483 | |
| Palliative Surgery (yes/no) | 29/86 | 28/145 | 0.060 | |
| TACE (yes/no) | 46/69 | 67/106 | 0.829 | |
| Systemic Treatment (yes/no) | 8/107 | 22/151 | 0.117 | |
| Clinical Stage Composition (IIIB- IIIC /IV) | 96/19 | 142/31 | 0.759 | |
Abbreviations: AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; HBV: Hepatitis B Virus; HCV: Hepatitis C Virus; TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Variables Influencing Survival of 288 Patients with HCC.
| Characteristics | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | β | Exp (β) | 95% CI for Exp (β) | |||
| Gender | 0.908 | – | – | – | – | |
| Male | 230 (79.9) | |||||
| Female | 58 (20.1) | |||||
| Age, years | 0.842 | – | – | – | – | |
| <50 | 61 (21.2) | |||||
| ≥50 | 227 (78.8) | |||||
| Child-Pugh stage | 0.126 | – | – | – | – | |
| A | 242 (84.0) | |||||
| B | 46 (16.0) | |||||
| Serum AFP | 214 (74.3) | −0.493 | 0.611 | 0.001 | ||
| <200μg/L | 74 (25.7) | 0.457–0.817 | ||||
| >200μg/L | ||||||
| TACE | 0.597 | 1.816 | <0.001 | |||
| Yes | 113 (39.2) | 1.362–2.421 | ||||
| No | 175 (60.8) | |||||
| Palliative Surgery | 0.460 | 1.584 | 0.006 | |||
| Yes | 57 (19.8) | 1.142–2.198 | ||||
| No | 231 (80.2) | |||||
| Systemic Chemotherapy | 0.064 | – | – | – | – | |
| Yes | 28 (9.7) | |||||
| No | 260 (90.3) | |||||
| Clinical Stage Composition | −1.072 | 0.342 | <0.001 | |||
| III | 197 (68.4) | 0.247–0.474 | ||||
| IV | 91 (31.6) | |||||
| TCM | 0.845 | 2.328 | <0.001 | |||
| Yes | 115 (39.9) | 1.796–3.017 | ||||
| No | 173 (60.1) | |||||
P-values in bold font are statistically significant. TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; CI: confidence interval; TCM: Traditional Chinese medicine.
Figure 2Survival analysis between the TCM and non-TCM group.
The median OS in the TCM group was longer than that in the on-TCM group (13 vs 6 months, respectively; P < 0.001). OS = overall survival, TCM = traditional Chinese medicine.
The putative major ingredients and major targets of 8 herbs.
Figure 3The ingredient-target networks of (A) RST, (B) FC, (C) CT, (D) RS, (E) RAB, (F) RB, (G) SL and (H) RAM. The diamond nodes represent ingredients, and the circular nodes represent targets. The colors of the nodes are illustrated from red to yellow in descending order of degree values.
Figure 4The herb-target networks of the 8 herbs.
The diamond nodes represent herbs, and the circular nodes represent targets. The targets distributed in a circle represent they are acting by the same number of herbs, which illustrated as “n”.
Figure 5Simplified pathways in HCC.
All of the targets are shown by the gene name.
Figure 6Effect of the aqueous extract of FC on cell proliferation and cell migration.
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (A) The morphology of SMMC-7721 cells (upper) and the result of wound-scratch assay (lower). (B) The results of Typanblue staining assay (left) and CCK-8 assay (right), “***” represented for p < 0.001. (C) Immunocytochemical staining showed Erk, p-Erk, Akt and p-Akt of four groups. (D) Western blot assay analyzed Erk, p-Erk, Akt and p-Akt of four groups.