Literature DB >> 27143497

Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.

Simon M Tavasoli1, Anna J Kone Pefoyo2, Joanne Hader3, Alex Lee4, Rachel Kupets5.   

Abstract

Study's Objective was to explore the impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation among eligible Ontario women 30 to 69years of age. A cross-sectional study was used to describe factors and screening patterns for 1,150,783 eligible women. A cohort design was used to compare the impact of invitation and reminder letters on Pap uptake comparing women who received the intervention (n=99,278) with a historical non-intervention group (n=130,181). Factors that might influence screening participation were included as covariates in a multivariable logistic regression models. Overall, 26.7% of women who had a Pap test 3 to 5years prior and 9.8% of women with no Pap test in the previous 5years were screened within 9months after the intervention. On cohort analysis, 14.1% of women in the intervention group and 8.5% of women in the non-intervention group were screened within 9months. Being mailed an invitation letter was associated with greater likelihood of screening (OR=1.8, CI 1.7-1.8). Controlling for covariates, the letter intervention was associated with 9month screening for both women with a Pap test 3 to 5years prior (AOR=1.7, CI 1.6-1.8) and those with no Pap test in the previous 5years (AOR=1.8, CI 1.7-1.9). There was a significant effect of all covariates on the participation. The invitation and reminder letter strategy increased cervical cancer screening participation. Additional strategies that could encourage eligible women to participate and/or removing barriers to screening for eligible women may be necessary.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Invitation letters; Pap test; Participation rate; Population-based; Reminder letters

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27143497     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  4 in total

1.  The Effects of Theory-Based Educational Intervention and WhatsApp Follow-up on Papanicolaou Smear Uptake Among Postnatal Women in Malaysia: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Zaahirah Mohammad; Norliza Ahmad; Anisah Baharom
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.947

2.  Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Maya E Kessler; Ravikumar Komandur Elayavilli; Branden C Hickey; Marianne R Scheitel; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Walter K Kremers; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Raising Awareness About Cervical Cancer Using Twitter: Content Analysis of the 2015 #SmearForSmear Campaign.

Authors:  Philippe Lenoir; Bilel Moulahi; Jérôme Azé; Sandra Bringay; Gregoire Mercier; François Carbonnel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Barriers and recommendations for a cervical cancer screening program among women in low-resource settings in Lagos Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tope Olubodun; Mobolanle Rasheedat Balogun; Abimbola Kofoworola Odeyemi; Oluwakemi Ololade Odukoya; Adedoyin Oyeyimika Ogunyemi; Oluchi Joan Kanma-Okafor; Ifeoma Peace Okafor; Ayodeji Bamidele Olubodun; Oluwatoyin Olanrewaju Progress Ogundele; Babatunde Ogunnowo; Akin Osibogun
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.135

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.