Literature DB >> 27143306

Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases.

Wayner Vieira de Souza1, Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo2, Maria de Fátima P Militão Albuquerque1, Maria Cynthia Braga1, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes2, Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho3, Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra4, George Santiago Dimech4, Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho4, Romildo Siqueira de Assunção4, Roselene Hans Santos4, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira5, Laura Cunha Rodrigues6, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli1.   

Abstract

The increase in the number of reported cases of microcephaly in Pernambuco State, and Northeast Brazil, characterized an epidemic that led the Brazilian Ministry of Health to declare a national public health emergency. The Brazilian Ministry of Health initially defined suspected cases as newborns with gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks and head circumference (HC) ≤ 33cm, but in December 2015 this cutoff was lowered to 32cm. The current study aimed to estimate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different cutoff points for HC, using ROC curves, with the Fenton and Intergrowth (2014) curves as the gold standard. The study described cases reported in Pernambuco from August 8 to November 28, 2015, according to sex and GA categories. The Fenton and Intergrowth methods provide HC growth curves according to GA and sex, and microcephaly is defined as a newborn with HC below the 3rd percentile in these distributions. Of the 684 reported cases, 599 were term or post-term neonates. For these, the analyses with ROC curves show that according to the Fenton criterion the cutoff point with the largest area under the ROC curve, with sensitivity greater than specificity, is 32cm for both sexes. Using the Intergrowth method and following the same criteria, the cutoff points are 32cm and 31.5cm for males and females, respectively. The cutoff point identified by the Fenton method (32cm) coincided with the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommendation. Adopting Intergrowth as the standard, the choice would be 32cm for males and 31.5cm for females. The study identified the need to conduct critical and on-going analyses to evaluate cutoff points, including other characteristics for microcephaly case definition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27143306     DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00017216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cad Saude Publica        ISSN: 0102-311X            Impact factor:   1.632


  5 in total

1.  Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Wayner Vieira de Souza; Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque; Enrique Vazquez; Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra; Antonio da Cruz Gouveia Mendes; Tereza Maciel Lyra; Thalia Velho Barreto de Araujo; André Luiz Sá de Oliveira; Maria Cynthia Braga; Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes; Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho; Amanda Priscila de Santana Cabral Silva; Laura Rodrigues; Celina Maria Turchi Martelli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  The Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: From Discovery to Future Implications.

Authors:  Rachel Lowe; Christovam Barcellos; Patrícia Brasil; Oswaldo G Cruz; Nildimar Alves Honório; Hannah Kuper; Marilia Sá Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Zika might not be acting alone: Using an ecological study approach to investigate potential co-acting risk factors for an unusual pattern of microcephaly in Brazil.

Authors:  Monica C Campos; Jamille G Dombrowski; Jody Phelan; Claudio R F Marinho; Martin Hibberd; Taane G Clark; Susana Campino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  ZikaPLAN: Zika Preparedness Latin American Network.

Authors:  A Wilder-Smith; R Preet; K E Renhorn; R A Ximenes; L C Rodrigues; T Solomon; J Neyts; L Lambrechts; H Willison; R Peeling; A K Falconar; A R Precioso; J Logan; T Lang; H P Endtz; M C Erasmus; E Massad
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  In silico predictions of protein interactions between Zika virus and human host.

Authors:  João Luiz de Lemos Padilha Pitta; Crhisllane Rafaele Dos Santos Vasconcelos; Gabriel da Luz Wallau; Túlio de Lima Campos; Antonio Mauro Rezende
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.