| Literature DB >> 27143226 |
Jiri Dolezal1,2, Miroslav Dvorsky1, Martin Kopecky1, Pierre Liancourt1, Inga Hiiesalu1, Martin Macek1, Jan Altman1, Zuzana Chlumska2, Klara Rehakova1, Katerina Capkova1,2, Jakub Borovec3, Ondrej Mudrak1, Jan Wild1, Fritz Schweingruber4.
Abstract
A rapid warming in Himalayas is predicted to increase plant upper distributional limits, vegetation cover and abundance of species adapted to warmer climate. We explored these predictions in NW Himalayas, by revisiting uppermost plant populations after ten years (2003-2013), detailed monitoring of vegetation changes in permanent plots (2009-2012), and age analysis of plants growing from 5500 to 6150 m. class="Chemical">Plant traits and microclimate variables were recorded to exclass="Chemical">plain observed vegetation changes. The elevation limits of several sclass="Chemical">pecies shifted uclass="Chemical">p to 6150 m, about 150 vertical meters above the limit of continuous class="Chemical">plant distribution. The class="Chemical">plant age analysis corroborated the hyclass="Chemical">pothesis of warming-driven uclass="Chemical">phill migration. However, the imclass="Chemical">pact of warming interacts with increasing class="Chemical">preciclass="Chemical">pitation and class="Chemical">physical disturbance. The extreme summer snowfall event in 2010 is likely resclass="Chemical">ponsible for substantial decrease in class="Chemical">plant cover in bothEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27143226 PMCID: PMC4855180 DOI: 10.1038/srep24881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study area in Eastern Ladakh, NW Himalayas.
(A) Subnival belt around Chamser Kangri peak (6660 m a.s.l.). (B) Daily course of air, surface and soil temperatures in the peak of the vegetation season at 6150 m; the key for the survival of plants here is the rooting zone temperature during the growing season. From July to August, plants are able to withstand freezing air temperatures almost every night for 5–10 hours, but they never occur where the rooting zone temperature falls deeply below zero during the period of active growth. (C) The oldest plant (22 years) at 6150 m was an endemic species Ladakiella klimesii. (D) Its age was derived from ring counts on a 0.7 mm radius of root collar.
Figure 2Climate conditions at the study area between January 2009 and September 2014.
Mean and maximum monthly temperatures (T), the number of days with snow cover (snowfall total) and difference betweem maximum and minimum daily T (range) are shown.
Figure 3Changes in plant cover and species richness in the alpine and subnival vegetation between August 2009 and 2012.
The dashed line represents the null hypothesis of no change in cover or richness between surveys, and the solid lines represent a linear regression fitted to the alpine and subnival data.
Figure 4Difference in plant age and annual growth increment between alpine and subnival species.
Non-overlapping notches in the boxes indicate the significance of between-group differences.
Figure 5Redundancy analysis biplots (RDA) of community weighted mean values of plant functional traits (gray arrows) and habitat indicator values (green arrows) in relation to elevation, vegetation belt (alpine, subnival) and total vegetation cover (red color).
The angles between arrows indicate correlations between variables (for explanation of trait and indicator values see Table 1). The environmental data explained 25.5% variability.
Comparison of plant traits and indicator values between the alpine and subnival vegetation and the shift in trait community-weighted means between two sampling periods from 2009 to 2012.
| Traits and habitat preferences | Abbreviation | Alpine09 | Subnival09 | P | Alpine_diff_2009–2012 | P | Subnival_diff_2009–2012 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | Height | 14.00 | 11.00 | ↓ | 0.204 | 1.058 | ↑ | |
| Leaf nitrogen content (%) | LNC | 2.26 | 2.42 | ↑ | −0.004 | −0.007 | ||
| Leaf phosphorus content (%) | LPC | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.002 | |||
| Leaf carbon content (%) | LCC | 42.84 | 41.59 | ↓ | 0.169 | ↑ | 0.414 | ↑ |
| Leaf carbon/nitrogen ratio | C:N | 20.13 | 18.40 | ↓ | 0.140 | 0.301 | ||
| Leaf δC13carbon (%) | C13 | −26.21 | −26.05 | 0.001 | −0.008 | |||
| Leaf dry matter content (mg/g) | LDMC | 176.63 | 131.84 | ↓ | 7.140 | ↑ | 1.608 | |
| Stem dry matter content (mg/g) | STDMC | 326.86 | 329.70 | −14.39 | ↓ | 52.84 | ↑a | |
| Root nitrogen content (%) | RNC | 1.16 | 1.52 | ↑ | −0.032 | ↓ | −0.056 | ↓ |
| Root phosphorus content (%) | RPC | 0.10 | 0.13 | ↑ | −0.003 | ↓ | −0.005 | ↓a |
| Starch content (%) | Starch | 2.48 | 2.00 | 0.020 | −0.043 | |||
| Fructan content (%) | Fructan | 2.72 | 4.78 | ↑ | −0.055 | −0.492 | ↓ | |
| Soluble carbohydrates (%) | SolubleSugar | 4.02 | 4.38 | ↑ | −0.100 | −0.047 | ||
| Total non-structural carbohydrates | TNC | 9.19 | 11.17 | ↑ | −0.149 | −0.581 | ||
| Seed weight (g) | SeedWeig | 0.04 | 0.03 | −0.003 | ↓ | 0.001 | ||
| Root depth (cm) | RootD | 14.18 | 8.94 | ↓ | 0.439 | ↑ | −0.434 | ↓ |
| Number of aboveground tillers | ShootNo | 18.02 | 15.83 | −0.386 | 1.105 | |||
| Number of flowers | FlowerNo | 7.36 | 7.24 | −0.340 | 0.466 | |||
| Total dry biomass (g) | TDB | 2.45 | 1.25 | ↓ | −0.018 | −0.060 | ||
| Clonal plants with rhizomes (%) | Clonal | 54 | 36 | ↓ | 2.7 | ↑ | 6.4 | ↑ |
| Non-clonal with tap-roots (%) | Nonclonal | 46 | 64 | ↑ | −2.7 | ↓ | −6.4 | ↓ |
| Nonspreading integrators (%) | IntegNS | 34 | 34 | −0.6 | −5.6 | ↓ | ||
| Nonspreading splitters (%) | SplitNS | 34 | 31 | 0.8 | 5.5 | ↑a | ||
| Spreading splitters (%) | SplitS | 20 | 5 | ↓ | 1.9 | ↑a | 0.9 | |
| Spreading integrators (%) | IntegS | 12 | 30 | ↑ | −0.022 | ↓ | −0.9 | |
| Indicator value_moisture | Moisture | 2.84 | 2.68 | ↓ | 0.049 | ↑ | 0.012 | |
| Indicator value_stability | Stability | 2.46 | 2.42 | 0.002 | 0.011 | |||
| Indicator value_salinity | Salinity | 0.33 | 0.12 | ↓ | 0.013 | ↑a | 0.003 | |
| Indicator value_nutrient | Nutrient | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.007 | 0.005 | |||
| Indicator value _shading | Shading | 0.09 | 0.09 | −0.003 | −0.006 | |||
| Elevational minima | Altmin | 5056.6 | 5311.1 | ↑ | 8.050 | −29.9 | ↓ | |
| Elevational optima | Altopt | 5246.2 | 5534.4 | ↑ | −1.033 | −24.2 | ↓ | |
| Elevational maxima | Altmax | 5708.9 | 5912.5 | ↑ | −1.469 | −14.2 | ↓a | |
| Elevational range | Altrange | 652.3 | 601.4 | ↓ | −9.520 | ↓a | 15.7 |
An upward or downward pointing arrow indicates an increase or decrease from the alpine to subnival, or temporal shift. Type I error estimates aP < 0.1, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6Life-history traits and ecological indicator values predicting species abundance changes in the alpine vegetation using the conditional inference tree.
In each split of the tree, all species predictors are tested and the one that best discriminates between species is selected. The procedure goes on until no predictor significantly discriminates between species. The response variable (y) is the ordination score on the partial ordination first axis determined by a temporal change (boxes). Negative values indicate species declining over time, and positive values indicate species expanding. Each split of the tree is described by the trait or indicator value used at the split (ovals), the permutation-based significance of the split (P-value) (ovals) and the treshold values at which the split occurs (for explanation of trait and indicator values see Table 1). The number of species (n) is given at each terminal node (box).