Literature DB >> 27142643

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis in a consecutive cohort of 550 patients.

Monique Tröbs1, Stephan Achenbach1, Jens Röther1, Lutz Klinghammer1, Christian Schlundt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) thrombosis in a large, real-world population.
BACKGROUND: There is some concern about device thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using BVS. No data have been published for PCI using both BVS and metal stents.
METHODS: A cohort of 550 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for stable chest pain or acute coronary syndromes with implantation of at least one BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular) was systematically followed up by telephone interview and review of medical charts. Data on device thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed in relationship to clinical and angiographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Follow-up was achieved in 533 patients (97%, median follow-up 233 days). A total of 964 BVS were implanted in 645 vessels. In addition, 234 metal stents were implanted in 149 patients, including "hybrid intervention" with the combined use of BVS and stents in the same artery in 122 patients. Documented were 15 definite, 1 probable, and 8 possible cases of device thrombosis (rate of definite/probable device thrombosis: 3.0%). Of these, 6 definite and 6 possible thromboses could be unambiguously attributed to BVS (1.1%), whereas a total of 11 definite, 1 probable, and 8 possible thromboses were potentially attributable to BVS (2.3%). Definite device thrombosis occurred in 7/122 patients with "hybrid intervention" (5.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort treated with BVS, the rate of scaffold thrombosis was higher than published for randomized trials. A high rate of thrombosis was observed after combined implantation of BVS and stents within one vessel.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioresorbable vascular scaffolds; revascularization; stents; thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27142643     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ashwin Nathan; Taisei Kobayashi; Daniel M Kolansky; Robert L Wilensky; Jay Giri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Use of a bioresorbable novolimus eluting vascular scaffold fails a hybrid PCI strategy with drug eluting stent.

Authors:  Vera S Schneider; Carsten Skurk; Matthias Riedel; Youssef S Abdelwahed; Ulf Landmesser; David M Leistner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Effect of upstream priming on transient downstream platelet-substrate interactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anne Pumford; Shekh Mojibur Rahman; Vladimir Hlady
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.999

Review 4.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Authors:  Mateusz P Jeżewski; Michał J Kubisa; Ceren Eyileten; Salvatore De Rosa; Günter Christ; Maciej Lesiak; Ciro Indolfi; Aurel Toma; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.