| Literature DB >> 27142265 |
Nidhi Garg1, Pushp Lata1, Simran Jit1, Naseer Sangwan1, Amit Kumar Singh1, Vatsala Dwivedi1, Neha Niharika1, Jasvinder Kaur1, Anjali Saxena1, Ankita Dua1, Namita Nayyar1, Puneet Kohli1, Birgit Geueke2, Petra Kunz2, Daniel Rentsch3, Christof Holliger4, Hans-Peter E Kohler2, Rup Lal5.
Abstract
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils were treated for a period of up to 64 days in situ (HCH dumpsite, Lucknow) and ex situ (University of Delhi) in line with three bioremediation approaches. The first approach, biostimulation, involved addition of ammonium phosphate and molasses, while the second approach, bioaugmentation, involved addition of a microbial consortium consisting of a group of HCH-degrading sphingomonads that were isolated from HCH contaminated sites. The third approach involved a combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation. The efficiency of the consortium was investigated in laboratory scale experiments, in a pot scale study, and in a full-scale field trial. It turned out that the approach of combining biostimulation and bioaugmentation was most effective in achieving reduction in the levels of α- and β-HCH and that the application of a bacterial consortium as compared to the action of a single HCH-degrading bacterial strain was more successful. Although further degradation of β- and δ-tetrachlorocyclohexane-1,4-diol, the terminal metabolites of β- and δ-HCH, respectively, did not occur by the strains comprising the consortium, these metabolites turned out to be less toxic than the parental HCH isomers.Entities:
Keywords: Bioaugmentation; Biostimulation; Consortium; Hexachlorocyclohexane; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27142265 DOI: 10.1007/s10532-016-9765-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biodegradation ISSN: 0923-9820 Impact factor: 3.909