| Literature DB >> 27141949 |
Shyam Thapa1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Nepal, while the use of the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) has been increasing rapidly in recent years, very little is known about the profile of ECP users. This study assesses the increasing role of ECP and the profile of ECP users in Nepal. Some policy and programmatic concerns are also addressed.Entities:
Keywords: Emergency contraception; Nepal; Users' profile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27141949 PMCID: PMC4855319 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0155-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Percentage aware of and ever used emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) by current users of ECP, Pokhara, 2014
| Ever heard | Ever used | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand® | Percentage | N | Percentage | N |
| I pill | 78.4 | 145/185 | 50.3 | 93/185 |
| E con | 78.4 | 145/185 | 44.9 | 83/185 |
| Max 72 | 36.2 | 67/185 | 16.8 | 31/185 |
| E 72 | 34.6 | 64/185 | 9.7 | 18/185 |
| Unwanted | 27.6 | 51/185 | 7.0 | 13/185 |
| Brand unknown | 2.2 | 4/185 | 2.2 | 4/185 |
| Any | 97.8 | 181/185 | 88.1 | 163/185 |
Prior use of emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) and timing of last sexual activity among current users of emergency contraception, Pokhara, 2014
| Range | Median (Mean) | N | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior ECP use (weeks ago) | 1–52 | 10.0 (14.1 ± 12.8) | 163 |
| Number of times ECP used in the past | 1–25 | 3.0 (4.3 ± 4.0) | 163 |
| Timing of the most recent sexual activity (hours earlier) | 2–80 | 20.0 (23.4 ± 16.2) | 182 |
| Timing of last menstrual period (days ago) | 2–40 | 17.0 (17.3 ± 6.6) | 182 |
20 respondents did not use the ECP in the past. Three cases were missing for the last two variables
Profile of the current users of emergency contraceptive pill (ECP), Pokhara, 2014
| Variable | % | N |
|---|---|---|
| Age group | ||
| <25 | 47.0 | 87 |
| 25–34 | 45.4 | 84 |
| 35 or older | 7.6 | 14 |
| Total | 100.0 | 185 |
| Educational attainment | ||
| Less than primary | 5.4 | 10 |
| Primary | 9.2 | 17 |
| Secondary | 15.1 | 28 |
| High school (10th grade) | 24.9 | 46 |
| Intermediate (10 + 2) | 33.0 | 61 |
| Bachelor’s or above | 12.4 | 23 |
| Total | 100.0 | 185 |
| Current marital status | ||
| Single | 29.7 | 55 |
| Married | 69.2 | 128 |
| Divorced/Separated | 1.1 | 2 |
| Total | 100.0 | 185 |
| If married, whether husband is away | ||
| Yes | 17.2 | 22 |
| No | 82.8 | 106 |
| Total | 100.0 | 128 |
| Number of living children | ||
| 0 | 49.7 | 91 |
| 1 | 31.7 | 58 |
| 2 or more | 18.6 | 34 |
| Total | 100.0 | 183a |
a2 missing cases
Decision regarding use of emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) and nature of relationship with the person among current users of emergency contraception, Pokhara, 2014
| Variable | Percentage | N |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage reporting that sexual relationship was consensual | 94.0 | 172/183 |
| Percentage who reported that the sexual relationship occurred with a well-acquainted person | 92.3 | 168/182 |
| Percentage who reported that that sexual relationship was completely spontaneous (unplanned and unanticipated) | 45.9 | 83/181 |
| Percentage who reported that it was their own decision to use emergency contraception | 32.8 | 60/183 |
| Percentage who reported that they have infrequent/casual sexual relationship | 69.7 | 124/178 |
Some categories do not add to 183 due to missing cases
Percentage aware and ever used contraceptive methods prior to the current use of emergency contraceptive pill (ECP), Pokhara, 2014
| Ever heard | Ever used | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Percentage | N | Percentage | N |
| Condom | 100.0 | 185/185 | 88.1 | 163/185 |
| Oral pill | 93.0 | 172/185 | 40.0 | 74/185 |
| Injectable | 92.4 | 171/185 | 24.3 | 45/185 |
| IUD | 28.6 | 53/185 | 0 | 0/185 |
| Implants | 35.7 | 66/185 | 0.5 | 1/185 |
| Withdrawal | 48.1 | 89/185 | 24.9 | 46/185 |
| Rhythm | 43.8 | 81/185 | 20.5 | 38/185 |
| Condom, pills or injectable | 100.0 | 185/185 | 94.6 | 175/185 |
| Any of seven methods | 100.0 | 185/185 | 96.2 | 178/185 |
Time when last contraceptive method was used (in weeks), Pokhara, 2014
| Method | Range | Median (Mean) | N |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condom | 0.14–52 | 2.0 (3.6 ± 6.1) | 108 |
| Oral pill | 0.14–64 | 4.0 (10.3 ± 14.2) | 35 |
| Injectable | 0.71–104 | 16.0 (22.6 ± 24.8) | 13 |
| Withdrawal or Rhythm | 0.14–5 | 1.0 (1.5 ± 1.5) | 17 |
Awareness of, use, and intent to use medical abortion, pregnancy test, ultrasound among current users of emergency contraceptive pill (ECP), Pokhara, 2014
| Heard and Used | Percentage | N |
|---|---|---|
| Ever used pregnancy test kit | 73.5 | 136/185 |
| Ever heard of ultrasound | 78.4 | 145/185 |
| Ever done ultrasounda | 65.5 | 95/145 |
| Intends to use ultrasound in the futurea | 31.0 | 45/145 |
| Ever heard of medical abortion | 84.3 | 156/185 |
| Ever used medical abortiona | 19.9 | 31/156 |
| Intends to use medical abortion if ECP does not worka | 53.2 | 83/156 |
aAmong those aware of given technology/product