Literature DB >> 27141497

Whole Exome Sequencing of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Shaghayegh Sabri1, Manouchehr Keyhani2, Mohammad Taghi Akbari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that leukemogenic chromosomal translocations, including fusions between Break point Cluster Region (BCR) and Abelson (ABL) are present in the peripheral blood of healthy individuals. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the genetic alterations other than BCR-Abl translocation in molecular level, which cause chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
METHODS: We performed whole-exome sequencing on four cases representative of BCR-ABL positive CML in chronic phase of the disease.
RESULTS: We did not identify any pathogenic mutation in all known genes involved in CML or other cancers in our subjects. Nevertheless, we identified polymorphisms in related genes.
CONCLUSION: It is the first report of exome sequencing in Philadelphia chromosome positive CML patients. We did not identify any pathogenic mutation in known cancer genes in our patients who can be due to CML pathogenesis or technical limitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CML; Iran; Whole exome sequencing

Year:  2016        PMID: 27141497      PMCID: PMC4851749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


Introduction

Human chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) caused by the Philadelphia chromosome translocation, a t (9; 22) that generates the BCR/ABL fusion oncoprotein” (1). The BCR-ABL fusion protein is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase. Normally, this kinase precisely regulates downstream genes, including c-Myc, Akt and Jun, all of which are major players to the proliferation and survival of normal cells. However, the hyperactivity of the BCR-ABL kinase upsets this fine balance and propels cells towards uncontrolled proliferation and survival, both of which provide a growth advantage to the malignant cells bearing this mutation, ultimately leading to CML (2). Next generation sequencing has proven to be an effective tool to identify recurrent, specific mutations in solid tumors and leukemias. Although the genetic heterogeneity of cancer necessitates some warn in the interpretation and application of the NGS results (3, 4), high-throughput sequencing remains a powerful instrument to refine potentially cancer diagnosis and treatment (5). The aim of this study was to gain insights into the genetic alterations other than BCR-Abl translocation in molecular level, which finally cause CML. We performed whole-exome sequencing of four cases representative of BCR-ABL positive CML in chronic phase of the disease.

Material and Methods

This study was conducted in Tarbiat Modares University Tehran, Iran in 2014. We used exome sequencing technology to identify mutations in molecular level in four individuals with CML who had given informed consent for sample collection and analysis. CML diagnosis was suspected by the Complete Blood Count (CBC) testing and then confirmed by identifying BCR-Abl translocation by real-time PCR. The selected patients were in chronic phase of CML without any other interfering disease and they received no treatment before sampling. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using the conventional salting-out method. The qualifying DNA samples were exome sequenced by BGI (Beijing Genomics Institute).

Exome sequencing procedures and data analysis

First, genomic DNA was randomly cleaved into a fragment library, purified and subsequently enriched by NimbleGen 2.1M-probe sequence capture array. The enriched library targeting the exome was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform to acquire paired-end reads with a read length of 90 base pairs. After removing reads containing sequencing adapters and low-quality reads with more than five unknown bases, high-quality reads were aligned with the human genome reference sequence (hg19/GRCh37) using Bowtie2 software 27 with default parameters. The PCR duplicates detected from Alignment files were subsequently removed with Picard (http://picard.sourceforge.net/) to improve alignment accuracy. The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) was then employed for base quality recalibration, local realignment around the potential insertion/deletion (Indel) sites and variant calling. The raw single nucleotide variants were filtered for low mapping quality, low coverage, SNP clusters, etc. Then, the filtered variants were annotated using ANNOVAR for the following parameters: function (exonic or splicing); gene; exonic function (synonymous, nonsynonymous, stop gain, non-frameshift or frameshift indels); amino acid change; conservation; dbSNP (version 135) reference number; allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project (2012 Feb version).

Results

Data characteristics of exome sequencing of four samples are shown in Table 1. Statistics of annotated variants in four samples before and after filtering are listed in Table 2. We also prepared a list of all genes already involved in CML reported in publications summarized in Table 3.
Table 1:

Whole exome sequencing characteristics

Items/samples23022230312365223878
Total effective reads51161535510820695025976650395087
Total effective yield (Mb)4532.414522.974444.544470.17
Average read length (bp)88.5988.5488.4388.7
Average sequencing depth on target56.756.1256.1456.66
Coverage of target region99.70%99.60%99.70%99.70%
Coverage of flanking region94.20%93.70%93.90%95.50%
Fraction of target covered with at least 20x86.10%85.10%87.10%89.10%
Fraction of target covered with at least 10x95.70%94.90%96.50%96.80%
Fraction of target covered with at least 4x98.90%98.60%99.10%99.00%
Fraction of flanking region covered with at least 20x18.70%18.70%18.50%20.40%
Fraction of flanking region covered with at least 10x41.00%40.80%40.90%44.30%
Fraction of flanking region covered with at least 4x71.00%70.50%70.50%74.50%
Mapping rate99.49%99.36%99.37%99.54%
Duplicate rate5.51%5.58%5.38%5.97%
Table 2:

Whole exome sequencing data statistics

Items/samples23022230312365223878
Total variants84385836188505987055
SNPs variants76627760167723578637
INDEL variants7758760278248418
Novel SNPs variants2751275027082778
Novel INDEL variants1951187519382155
Novel functional SNPs variants441434432389
Novel functional INDEL variants63565958
Table 3:

CML candidate genes (known to be involved in CML)

GeneDescriptionLink
JAK 2Janus kinase 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657500
STAP2signal transducing adaptor family member 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231445
IKZF1IKAROS family zinc finger 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18408710
FANCD2Fanconi anemia, complementation group D2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21203397
COPS5COP9 signalosome subunit 5http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21935931
SKP2S-phase kinase-associated protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717963
SHC1SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10676660
GAB2GRB2-associated binding protein 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12124177
GRB2growth factor receptor-bound protein 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10887132
CRKv-crk avian sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homologhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8632906
DOK2docking protein 2, 56kDahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15611294
DOK1docking protein 1, 62kDa (downstream of tyrosine kinase 1)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15611294
NEDD9neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 9http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848808
SGK223homolog of rat pragma of Rnd2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20697350
RhoAras homolog family member Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22443473
LRRK1leucine-rich repeat kinase 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20697350
CBLCbl proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9195915
TWIST-1twist family bHLH transcription factor 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123820
PIK3R1phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 1 (alpha)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23292937
INPPL1inositol polyphosphate phosphatase-like 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10194451
HCKHCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12592324
LYNLYN proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509383
HoxA9homeobox A9http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20141430
RKIPphosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015191
CDC42cell division cycle 42http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718053
NOX4NADPH oxidase 4http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928540
PHLPP1PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261608
PHLPP2PH domain and leucine rich repeat protein phosphatase 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261608
STAT5signal transducer and activator of transcription 5http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170113
PIK3R2phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 2 (beta)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18704194
PIK3CAphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alphahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644865
MTORmechanistic target of rapamycin (serine/threonine kinase)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21715304
MYBv-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homologhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2741649
USP18ubiquitin specific peptidase 18http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17374743
BACH2BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11746976
SELEselectin Ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15674360
NOVnephroblastoma overexpressedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19623482
NUDCD1NudC domain containing 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11416219
FOLR3folate receptor 3 (gamma)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8110752
MSI2musashi RNA-binding protein 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12649177
RARAretinoic acid receptor, alphahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8180390
NUP98nucleoporin 98kDahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971156
VPREB1pre-B lymphocyte 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23881307
SOCS6suppressor of cytokine signaling 6http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25172101
CSF3Rcolony stimulating factor 3 receptor (granulocyte)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656643
LHX2LIM homeobox 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14687986
NPM1nucleophosmin (nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, numatrin)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961029
ABCG2ATP-binding cassette, sub-family G (WHITE), member 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24123600
SMOsmoothened, frizzled class receptorhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772113
NUMBnumb homolog (Drosophila)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21084860
miR-31microRNA 31http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22511990
TECtec protein tyrosine kinasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22739199
miR-155microRNA 155http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22511990
RGS2regulator of G-protein signaling 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7643615
BLKBLK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22797726
NAT8N-acetyltransferase 8 (GCN5-related, putative)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556617
miR-564microRNA 564http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22511990
ALOX5arachidonate 5-lipoxygenasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19503090
CD44CD44 moleculehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16998483
AXLAXL receptor tyrosine kinasehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7521695
FOXO3forkhead box O3http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644865
AKAP13A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 13http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8290273
AHI1Abelson helper integration site 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183070
SETBP1SET binding protein 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22566606
IRF8interferon regulatory factor 8http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24242069
ETV6ets variant 6http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19480935
PDGFBplatelet-derived growth factor beta polypeptidehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2660925
PDGFRAplatelet-derived growth factor receptor, alpha polypeptidehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175693
GATA2GATA binding protein 2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19304323
VEGFCvascular endothelial growth factor Chttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22169285
AKAP12A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 12http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15287943
SLC22A1solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23272163
PRKDCprotein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic polypeptidehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11264175
WNTwingless-type MMTV integration site familyhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22823957
Whole exome sequencing characteristics Whole exome sequencing data statistics CML candidate genes (known to be involved in CML) Then we checked all filtered variants in each individual for these known genes to find cancer related genes but we did not identify any pathogenic mutation. Nevertheless, we identified polymorphisms in related genes, some of listed in Table 4.
Table 4:

Identified polymorphism in this study

GeneNM_IDVariantFunction
AKAP12NM_144497rs3842128Inframe insertion
rs10872670Missense
rs3734799Missense
SETBP1NM_001130110rs3085861Frameshift insertion
rs663651Missense
rs3744825Missense
FOLR3NM_000804rs71891516Frameshift insertion
PIK3R2NM_005027rs1011320Missense
CD44NM_001001389rs9666607Missense
rs1467558Missense
AXLNM_001699rs7249222Missense
AKAP13NM_006738rs2061821Missense
rs2061822Missense
rs2061824Missense
SLC22A1NM_003057rs683369Missense
rs628031Missense
PDGFRANM_006206rs35597368Missense
SONNM_032195rs13433428Missense
rs13047599Missense
Identified polymorphism in this study

Discussion

In this study we performed exome sequencing as a high throughput technology to identify genetic alterations other than BCR-Abl translocation or those that lead to this cytogenetic translocation at molecular level which finally cause CML. We used public databases to prepare a list of cancer genes for further analysis; however, no pathogenic mutation was identified. Moreover, we analyzed functional variants (coding region and splice site variants) bioinformatically, but no pathogenic mutation was found. Logically, there are two main reasons for such results in our survey; disease nature and the technique characteristics. A chromosomal translocation includes a DNA double strand break and repair more specifically, mis-repair. Accordingly, all genes implicated in homologous recombination and non-homolegous end joining, as the two main DSB repair pathways, are putative candidate genes mutated before BCR-Abl translocation (6). Moreover, Alu elements have been involved in the pathogenesis of some complex translocations including BCR and ABL, but these are extremely rare (7). Leukemogenic chromosomal translocations, including fusions between BCR and ABL are present in the peripheral blood of healthy individuals (8). It was controversial because for decades it had been proposed that these translocations unavoidably led to leukemia. There are important hints in these results. First, it forcefully implies that this oncogenic translocation is not adequate to produce malignancy, but it instead produces a “pre-malignant” clone that requires additional, complementary, events to transform fully the cell. On the other hand, this result shows that detection of an oncogenic translocation is not equivalent to detection of a malignancy (9, 10). Second, this result makes a possible explanation for the observation that mice manipulated to overexpress an oncogenic fusion protein often do not grow leukemia. In these mice, one oncogenic mutation is integrated in the mouse germline, but leukemic transformation is not triggered until additional mutation(s) occur spontaneously as the mouse ages. However, most of these putative mutations have not been characterized (6) and we did not identify any pathogenic mutation in related genes as well. In this study; however some polymorphic variants were identified among them; SNPs rs683369 and rs628031 in SLC22A1, found in all subjects, have previously been studied in relation to imatinib response. “SNP rs683369 and advanced disease stage are correlated with a high rate of loss of cytogenetic response or treatment failure to imatinib in CML patients” (11). We cannot determine the effect of this variant due to the chronic phase of the disease in our patients. Moreover, Chowbay et al. revealed a sub-haplotypic region encompassing one exonic SNP (rs628031) surrounded by two intronic SNPs [IVS6-878C.A (rs3798168) and IVS7+850C.T] that is significantly associated with imatinib clearance (12). Except rs628031, two other polymorphisms of this sub-haplotypic region were not detected in our subjects. Exome sequencing has been a fast and cost-effective tool to identify recurrent, specific mutations in solid tumors and leukemias (13–15). Nevertheless, this recent technique has some limitations too. Two main technical limitations in NGS, which impress exome-sequencing results, are homologous sequences and guanine cytosine (GC) bias (16) which lead to alignment errors. Another technical consideration with exome sequencing is that variants located in UTRs, intronic, promoter, and intergenic regulatory regions are mostly missed. Although it is often difficult to interpret novel variants in such regions, there are known pathogenic variants in many genes that lie outside the exons.

Conclusion

It is the first report of exome sequencing in Philadelphia chromosome positive CML patients. We did not identify any pathogenic mutation in known cancer genes in our patients who can be due to CML pathogenesis or technical limitations.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Advances in whole genome sequencing technology.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhao; Struan F A Grant
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.837

2.  Mutation of FOXL2 in granulosa-cell tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  Sohrab P Shah; Martin Köbel; Janine Senz; Ryan D Morin; Blaise A Clarke; Kimberly C Wiegand; Gillian Leung; Abdalnasser Zayed; Erika Mehl; Steve E Kalloger; Mark Sun; Ryan Giuliany; Erika Yorida; Steven Jones; Richard Varhol; Kenneth D Swenerton; Dianne Miller; Philip B Clement; Colleen Crane; Jason Madore; Diane Provencher; Peter Leung; Anna DeFazio; Jaswinder Khattra; Gulisa Turashvili; Yongjun Zhao; Thomas Zeng; J N Mark Glover; Barbara Vanderhyden; Chengquan Zhao; Christine A Parkinson; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; David D L Bowtell; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; James D Brenton; Samuel A Aparicio; Niki Boyd; Martin Hirst; C Blake Gilks; Marco Marra; David G Huntsman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia.

Authors:  Enrico Tiacci; Vladimir Trifonov; Gianluca Schiavoni; Antony Holmes; Wolfgang Kern; Maria Paola Martelli; Alessandra Pucciarini; Barbara Bigerna; Roberta Pacini; Victoria A Wells; Paolo Sportoletti; Valentina Pettirossi; Roberta Mannucci; Oliver Elliott; Arcangelo Liso; Achille Ambrosetti; Alessandro Pulsoni; Francesco Forconi; Livio Trentin; Gianpietro Semenzato; Giorgio Inghirami; Monia Capponi; Francesco Di Raimondo; Caterina Patti; Luca Arcaini; Pellegrino Musto; Stefano Pileri; Claudia Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger; Giovanni Pizzolo; Robin Foà; Laurent Farinelli; Torsten Haferlach; Laura Pasqualucci; Raul Rabadan; Brunangelo Falini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Chromosome translocations and covert leukemic clones are generated during normal fetal development.

Authors:  Hiroshi Mori; Susan M Colman; Zhijian Xiao; Anthony M Ford; Lyn E Healy; Craig Donaldson; Jill M Hows; Cristina Navarrete; Mel Greaves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recurrent SETBP1 mutations in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Rocco Piazza; Simona Valletta; Nils Winkelmann; Sara Redaelli; Roberta Spinelli; Alessandra Pirola; Laura Antolini; Luca Mologni; Carla Donadoni; Elli Papaemmanuil; Susanne Schnittger; Dong-Wook Kim; Jacqueline Boultwood; Fabio Rossi; Giuseppe Gaipa; Greta P De Martini; Paola Francia di Celle; Hyun Gyung Jang; Valeria Fantin; Graham R Bignell; Vera Magistroni; Torsten Haferlach; Enrico Maria Pogliani; Peter J Campbell; Andrew J Chase; William J Tapper; Nicholas C P Cross; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Advances in the biology and therapy of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Carmen Fava; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Lymphoma- and leukemia-associated chromosomal translocations in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Siegfried Janz; Michael Potter; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Shai Izraeli; Dalia Waldman
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.195

9.  Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome.

Authors:  Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; David J Dooling; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; Ken Chen; Daniel C Koboldt; Robert S Fulton; Kim D Delehaunty; Sean D McGrath; Lucinda A Fulton; Devin P Locke; Vincent J Magrini; Rachel M Abbott; Tammi L Vickery; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Todd Wylie; Scott M Smith; Lynn Carmichael; James M Eldred; Christopher C Harris; Jason Walker; Joshua B Peck; Feiyu Du; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Anthony M Brummett; Eric Clark; Joshua F McMichael; Rick J Meyer; Jonathan K Schindler; Craig S Pohl; John W Wallis; Xiaoqi Shi; Ling Lin; Heather Schmidt; Yuzhu Tang; Carrie Haipek; Madeline E Wiechert; Jolynda V Ivy; Joelle Kalicki; Glendoria Elliott; Rhonda E Ries; Jacqueline E Payton; Peter Westervelt; Michael H Tomasson; Mark A Watson; Jack Baty; Sharon Heath; William D Shannon; Rakesh Nagarajan; Daniel C Link; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Richard K Wilson; Timothy J Ley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical relevance of a pharmacogenetic approach using multiple candidate genes to predict response and resistance to imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Dong Hwan Dennis Kim; Lakshmi Sriharsha; Wei Xu; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Xiangdong Liu; Katherine Siminovitch; Hans A Messner; Jeffrey H Lipton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Literature Review of Whole Exome and Genome Sequencing Population Studies of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer.

Authors:  Alisa M Goldstein; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Melissa Rotunno; Rolando Barajas; Mindy Clyne; Elise Hoover; Naoko I Simonds; Tram Kim Lam; Leah E Mechanic
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Clinical resistance to crenolanib in acute myeloid leukemia due to diverse molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Haijiao Zhang; Samantha Savage; Anna Reister Schultz; Daniel Bottomly; Libbey White; Erik Segerdell; Beth Wilmot; Shannon K McWeeney; Christopher A Eide; Tamilla Nechiporuk; Amy Carlos; Rachel Henson; Chenwei Lin; Robert Searles; Hoang Ho; Yee Ling Lam; Richard Sweat; Courtney Follit; Vinay Jain; Evan Lind; Gautam Borthakur; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jorge Cortes; Robert Collins; Daelynn R Buelow; Sharyn D Baker; Brian J Druker; Jeffrey W Tyner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.