Literature DB >> 27140814

A Systematic Review of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location Evaluated by Quadrant Method for Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anatomic Reconstruction.

Hu Xu1, Chunli Zhang2, Qiang Zhang3, Tianshu Du1, Ming Ding1, Yingchun Wang1, Sai-Chuen Fu4, Chelsea Hopkins4, Shu-Hang Yung4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To unravel the standard position of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral origin and deduce practical arthroscopic localization and postsurgical evaluation method.
METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed using the terms ACL, footprint, femur, etc. We included studies published since January 1, 2000, in which the results were measured by Bernard's quadrant method. This method consists of 4 distances, including total diameter of lateral condyle along Blumensaat's line (distance t), maximum intercondylar notch height (distance h), distance from center of footprint to proximal border (distance x), and distance from center of footprint to Blumensaat's line (distance y). The data of included studies were combined to calculate theoretical centers and standard area for both ACL as a whole bundle and as anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles individually. Finally, we translated the combined data to arthroscopic localization and postsurgical evaluation.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included. The theoretical centers of ACL as a whole bundle is 28.4% ± 5.1% (x) of distance t and 35.7% ± 6.9% (y) of distance h, whereas AM bundle is 24.2% ± 4%, 21.6% ± 5.2% (x, y) and PL bundle is 32.8% ± 4.7%, 46.7% ± 4.9% (x, y), respectively. The standard area of ACL footprint is a circle with a center of 27.53%, 35.85% (x, y), and a radius of 4.58%, 9.2% (x, y), respectively. Translation of combined data shows that under arthroscopy, for single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the midpoint of distance from border of proximal to distal articular cartilage is the center of anatomic femoral socket.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined data unravel the standard position of ACL femoral origin. It can be used by clinicians to localize anatomic tunnel both in surgery and postsurgical evaluation. For single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the midpoint of lateral femoral condyle corresponds to anatomic socket. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of anatomic studies.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27140814     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  18 in total

1.  Anatomic Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anteromedial Portal All-Inside and Outside-In Techniques.

Authors:  Jeremy M Burnham; Chaitu S Malempati; Aaron Carpiaux; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  Clinical outcomes of rectangular tunnel technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were comparable to the results of conventional round tunnel technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Woo-Sung Kim; Boo-Seop Kim; Hyun-Soo Ok; Jong-Heon Kim; Jeuk Lee; Young-Bok Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The orientation of the ALL femoral tunnel to minimize collision with the ACL tunnel depends on the need or not of far-cortex drilling.

Authors:  Hyun-Soo Moon; Chong-Hyuk Choi; Young-Jin Seo; Younghan Lee; Min Jung; Jung-Hun Park; Sung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  Does Viewing the ACL Femoral Footprint End on Using a High Medial Portal Produce Better Tunnel Placement as Compared to Viewing it from a Lateral Portal while Drilling: A 3D CT-based Pilot Study.

Authors:  Vikram A Mhaskar; Ajay K Singh; Pankaj Soni; Jitendra Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  On the heterogeneity of the femoral enthesis of the human ACL: microscopic anatomy and clinical implications.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Comparing Transtibial and Anteromedial Drilling Techniques for Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Erhan Sukur; Yunus Emre Akman; Ahmet Senel; Ethem Ayhan Unkar; Huseyin Nevzat Topcu; And Yusuf Ozturkmen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-09-30

7.  Three-Dimensional CT Evaluation of Tunnel Positioning in ACL Reconstruction Using the Single Anteromedial Bundle Biological Augmentation (SAMBBA) Technique.

Authors:  Florent Buscayret; Eduardo Frois Temponi; Adnan Saithna; Mathieu Thaunat; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-22

8.  Have Evolving Surgical Methods Improved Clinical Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  In vivo gait kinematics of the knee after anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a prospective study.

Authors:  Wenqiang Yan; Xingquan Xu; Qian Xu; Ziying Sun; Dongyang Chen; Zhihong Xu; Qing Jiang; Dongquan Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 10.  Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Authors:  Shiyi Yao; Bruma Sai-Chuen Fu; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.