Namhee Kim1, Moonseong Heo2, Roman Fleysher3, Craig A Branch4, Michael L Lipton5. 1. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Radiology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: Namhee.Kim@einstein.yu.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Radiology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 4. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Radiology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 5. The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Radiology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; The Dominick P Purpura Department of Neuroscience, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, The Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: Michael.Lipton@einstein.yu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging reveals macro- and microstructural correlates of neurodegeneration, which are often assessed using voxel-by-voxel t-tests for comparing mean image intensities measured by fractional anisotropy (FA) between cases and controls or regression analysis for associating mean intensity with putative risk factors. This analytic strategy focusing on mean intensity in individual voxels, however, fails to account for change in distribution of image intensities due to disease. NEW METHOD: We propose a method that aims to facilitate simple and clear characterization of underlying distribution. Our method consists of two steps: subject-level (Step 1) and group-level or a specific risk-level density function estimation across subjects (Step 2). RESULTS: The proposed method was demonstrated with a simulated data set and real FA data sets from two white matter tracts, where the proposed method successfully detected any departure of the FA distribution from the normal state by disease: p<0.001 for simulated data; p=0.047 for the posterior limb of internal capsule; p=0.06 for the posterior thalamic radiation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): The proposed method found significant disease effect (p<0.001) while conventional 2-group t-test focused only on mean intensity did not (p=0.61) in a simulation study. While significant age effects were found for each white matter tract from conventional linear model analysis with real FA data, the proposed method further confirmed that aging also triggers distribution-wide change. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method is powerful for detection of risk factors associated with any type of microstructural neurodegenerations with brain imaging data.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging reveals macro- and microstructural correlates of neurodegeneration, which are often assessed using voxel-by-voxel t-tests for comparing mean image intensities measured by fractional anisotropy (FA) between cases and controls or regression analysis for associating mean intensity with putative risk factors. This analytic strategy focusing on mean intensity in individual voxels, however, fails to account for change in distribution of image intensities due to disease. NEW METHOD: We propose a method that aims to facilitate simple and clear characterization of underlying distribution. Our method consists of two steps: subject-level (Step 1) and group-level or a specific risk-level density function estimation across subjects (Step 2). RESULTS: The proposed method was demonstrated with a simulated data set and real FA data sets from two white matter tracts, where the proposed method successfully detected any departure of the FA distribution from the normal state by disease: p<0.001 for simulated data; p=0.047 for the posterior limb of internal capsule; p=0.06 for the posterior thalamic radiation. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): The proposed method found significant disease effect (p<0.001) while conventional 2-group t-test focused only on mean intensity did not (p=0.61) in a simulation study. While significant age effects were found for each white matter tract from conventional linear model analysis with real FA data, the proposed method further confirmed that aging also triggers distribution-wide change. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method is powerful for detection of risk factors associated with any type of microstructural neurodegenerations with brain imaging data.
Authors: Zhifeng Kou; Zhen Wu; Karen A Tong; Barbara Holshouser; Randall R Benson; Jiani Hu; E Mark Haacke Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael L Lipton; Namhee Kim; Young K Park; Miriam B Hulkower; Tova M Gardin; Keivan Shifteh; Mimi Kim; Molly E Zimmerman; Richard B Lipton; Craig A Branch Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Kelvin O Lim; Babak A Ardekani; Jay Nierenberg; Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt; Matthew J Hoptman Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kenichi Oishi; Andreia Faria; Hangyi Jiang; Xin Li; Kazi Akhter; Jiangyang Zhang; John T Hsu; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Marilyn Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos; Roger Woods; Arthur W Toga; G Bruce Pike; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Alan Evans; John Mazziotta; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: R Della Nave; S Foresti; A Pratesi; A Ginestroni; M Inzitari; E Salvadori; M Giannelli; S Diciotti; D Inzitari; M Mascalchi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Mark Jenkinson; Daniel Rueckert; Thomas E Nichols; Karla L Miller; Matthew D Robson; Derek K Jones; Johannes C Klein; Andreas J Bartsch; Timothy E J Behrens Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491