F J Pena Pardo1, A M García Vicente2, M Amo-Salas3, J F López-Fidalgo3, J A Garrido Robles4, J Á de Ayala Fernández5, P Del Saz Saucedo6, M Muñoz Pasadas7, A Soriano Castrejón2. 1. Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain. fjpena@msn.com. 2. Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain. 3. Mathematics Department, Castilla La Mancha University, Ciudad Real, Spain. 4. Neurology Department, Virgen de la Salud Hospital, Toledo, Spain. 5. Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital, Albacete, Spain. 6. Neurology Department, Mancha Centro Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain. 7. Neurology Department, Puertollano Hospital, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients suspected of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) based on our own pre-test risk classification (PRC). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective longitudinal study was conducted from 2006 to 2014. We designed a seven-point scoring system using the clinical syndrome characteristics [classical (CS) and non-classical syndromes (NCS)] and its location (central, peripheral, in the neuromuscular junction or combined), onconeural antibodies and tumor markers. Patients were classified as low (score 0-2), intermediate (3-4) and high (5-7) pre-test risk of PNS. FDG-PET/CT was classified as negative or positive. Final diagnosis according Graus' criteria (definite, possible or no PNS) was established. Relations between clinical and metabolic variables with the final diagnosis were studied. RESULTS: 73 patients were included, with a follow-up time of 33 months. Eleven (15 %) patients were finally diagnosed with neoplasm (8 invasive cancers). Ultimately, 13 (18 %) and 24 (33 %) subjects were diagnosed as definite or possible PNS. All the patients with final diagnosis of neoplasm had a CS (p = 0.005). PET/CT was helpful to diagnose 6/8 (75 %) invasive cancers. PET/CT findings were associated with the final diagnosis of neoplasm (p = 0.003) and the diagnosis of PNS attending to Graus' criteria (p = 0.019). PRC showed significant association with the final diagnosis of neoplasm and PET/CT results. A majority of patients (10/11) diagnosed of neoplasm had intermediate/high-risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our PRC seems to be a valid tool to select candidates for PET/CT imaging in this setting. PET/CT detected malignancy in a significant proportion of patients with invasive cancer.
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients suspected of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) based on our own pre-test risk classification (PRC). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective longitudinal study was conducted from 2006 to 2014. We designed a seven-point scoring system using the clinical syndrome characteristics [classical (CS) and non-classical syndromes (NCS)] and its location (central, peripheral, in the neuromuscular junction or combined), onconeural antibodies and tumor markers. Patients were classified as low (score 0-2), intermediate (3-4) and high (5-7) pre-test risk of PNS. FDG-PET/CT was classified as negative or positive. Final diagnosis according Graus' criteria (definite, possible or no PNS) was established. Relations between clinical and metabolic variables with the final diagnosis were studied. RESULTS: 73 patients were included, with a follow-up time of 33 months. Eleven (15 %) patients were finally diagnosed with neoplasm (8 invasive cancers). Ultimately, 13 (18 %) and 24 (33 %) subjects were diagnosed as definite or possible PNS. All the patients with final diagnosis of neoplasm had a CS (p = 0.005). PET/CT was helpful to diagnose 6/8 (75 %) invasive cancers. PET/CT findings were associated with the final diagnosis of neoplasm (p = 0.003) and the diagnosis of PNS attending to Graus' criteria (p = 0.019). PRC showed significant association with the final diagnosis of neoplasm and PET/CT results. A majority of patients (10/11) diagnosed of neoplasm had intermediate/high-risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our PRC seems to be a valid tool to select candidates for PET/CT imaging in this setting. PET/CT detected malignancy in a significant proportion of patients with invasive cancer.
Authors: M Hadjivassiliou; S J Alder; E J R Van Beek; M B Hanney; E Lorenz; D G Rao; B Sharrack; W B Tindale Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 3.209
Authors: M J Titulaer; R Soffietti; J Dalmau; N E Gilhus; B Giometto; F Graus; W Grisold; J Honnorat; P A E Sillevis Smitt; R Tanasescu; C A Vedeler; R Voltz; J J G M Verschuuren Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: A Reum Chun; Hye Min Jo; Seoung Ho Lee; Hong Woo Chun; Jung Mi Park; Kyu Jin Kim; Chan Hee Jung; Ji Oh Mok; Sung Koo Kang; Chul Hee Kim; Bo Yeon Kim Journal: Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) Date: 2014-07-18
Authors: F Graus; J Y Delattre; J C Antoine; J Dalmau; B Giometto; W Grisold; J Honnorat; P Sillevis Smitt; Ch Vedeler; J J G M Verschuuren; A Vincent; R Voltz Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: S Younes-Mhenni; M F Janier; L Cinotti; J C Antoine; F Tronc; V Cottin; P J Ternamian; P Trouillas; J Honnorat Journal: Brain Date: 2004-09-10 Impact factor: 13.501