Literature DB >> 27138929

Retrospective comparison of sedated and non-sedated colonoscopy in an outpatient practice.

Ali Mothanna Al-Zubaidi1, Abdelfattah Abdelqader Al-Shadadi2, Hassan Uthman Alghamdy2, Abdu Hassan Alzobady2, Laeeque Ahmed Al-Qureshi2, Ibraheem Mohammed Al-Bakri2.   

Abstract

Although sedation and analgesia for patients undergoing colonoscopy are the standard practice in western countries, non-sedated colonoscopy is still in practice in Europe and the Far East. This variation in sedation practice relies on the different cultural attitudes of both patients and endoscopists across these countries. Data from the literature consistently report that, in non-sedated patients, the use of alternative techniques, such as water irrigation or carbon dioxide insufflation, can allow a high-quality and well-tolerated examination. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected performance improvement in endoscopy unit at King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia. The tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation in terms of patient's ability to return to routine work and drive if necessary on the same day of procedure was evaluated. A total of 538 patients who underwent a colonoscopy at King Khalid Hospital endoscopy unit (Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) were reviewed from September 2011 to November 2013. All of the procedures were performed by two expert endoscopists, assisted by well-trained nursing staff. Insertion of the colonoscope was aided by insufflations of air, and in a few instances, by water through the colonoscope to minimize air insufflations. IV sedatives were administered upon the judgment of the physician when patient was unable to tolerate the procedure. Of 538 patients who underwent a colonoscopy, 79 patients required sedation. Forty-seven during the procedure and 32 requested pre-procedure sedation, most of them below 20 years of age. Thirty-two who requested pre-procedure sedation were excluded from our statistics. Of the remaining 506 cases, 47 (9.3 %) required sedation during procedure while 459 (90.7 %) tolerated the procedure without sedation. This shortened the hospital stay time, improved the ability to return to work much earlier, and undertake daily activities such as driving. It is also cost effective. The approach of non-sedative colonoscopy and use of sedation on-demand with minimal air insufflation or water infusion when needed during the procedure were well tolerated by approximately 91 % of patients at a single center in Saudi Arabia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Colonoscopy; Endoscopy; Non-sedated colonoscopy; Sedation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27138929     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-016-0648-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  19 in total

1.  The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey.

Authors:  Ashley L Faulx; Stacie Vela; Ananya Das; Gregory Cooper; Michael V Sivak; Gerard Isenberg; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: a pilot study in United States veterans.

Authors:  J W Leung; S Mann; F W Leung
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 3.  Colonoscopy.

Authors:  C Williams; R Teague
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A technique to facilitate colonoscopy in areas of severe diverticular disease.

Authors:  Z M Falchuk; P H Griffin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Ensuring safety of patients receiving sedation for procedures: evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  S S Poe; M T Nolan; D Dang; J Schauble; D G Oechsle; L Kress; J Larkins; E R Feroli; A Walker; L G Maxwell
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-01

6.  Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.

Authors:  Danny W H Lee; Anthony C N Li; Chi-wah Ko; David W Chu; Kang-chung Chan; Chi-ming Poon; Kwok-sang Sin; Kam-fung Leung; Tak-suen Sze; Angus C W Chan; Sydney C S Chung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Patrick Connor; Daniel McGee; Paul Jowell; Nick Nickl; Steve Schutz; Joseph Leung; John Lee; Eric Libby
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Colonoscopy without sedation.

Authors:  M S Hoffman; T W Butler; T Shaver
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 10.  Unsedated colonoscopy: is it feasible?

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.