Literature DB >> 27138840

The economic burden of outpatient appointments following paediatric fractures.

Anne Guro Vreim Holm1, Hilde Lurås2, Per-Henrik Randsborg3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric fractures are common and frequently followed-up. The aim of this study is to quantify the private costs for the affected families, as well as the costs for society due to paediatric fracture clinic follow-up appointments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 295 paired parent and surgeon questionnaire regarding the cost related to a scheduled follow-up appointment for an upper limb fracture in children aged 6-13 years were collected prospectively over 7 months. In addition, the medical appropriateness of the appointment and whether or not the control changed the management of the fracture was investigated.
RESULTS: The direct cost of attending a paediatric upper limb fracture clinic was estimated to €48.5 while the cost for society due to productivity loss was €78.4 per consultation. In 89.2% of the cases the surgeons found the appointment necessary, it was deemed unnecessary or inconclusive in 10.6%. The treatment plan was altered in 6.8%, and an extra follow up was scheduled in 5.8%. Fractures of the clavicle were most often regarded as unnecessary to follow up clinically or radiologically by the surgeons. DISCUSSION: The direct cost for the affected families and the costs for society due to productivity loss of paediatric fracture follow-up appointments are noticeable. Although most patients and surgeons deem these controls as valuable, they lead to a change in treatment plan in only 12.6% of the cases. A stringent management protocol can safely reduce the number of clinical and radiographical follow-ups.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up; Fracture management; Paediatric fractures; Socioeconomic costs; Upper limb

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27138840     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  Fracture incidence in children and adolescents 0-19 years old in Mexico: a 12-year cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Clark; Diana Montiel-Ojeda; Ramón Alberto Rascón-Pacheco; Miguel A Guagnelli; Desirée Lopez-Gonzalez; Alhelí Bremer; Víctor Hugo Borja-Aburto
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.879

2.  Management of Gartland Type 1 Supracondylar Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephanie Coupal; Kenneth Lukas; Amy Plint; Maala Bhatt; Kevin Cheung; Kevin Smit; Sasha Carsen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Pediatric Hand Fracture Referring Practices: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hartley; Anna R Todd; Alan R Harrop; Frankie O G Fraulin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Routine radiographic follow-up is not necessary after physeal fractures of the distal tibia in children.

Authors:  Antti Stenroos; Jussi Kosola; Jani Puhakka; Topi Laaksonen; Matti Ahonen; Yrjänä Nietosvaara
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Derivation and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model for Pediatric Hand Fracture Triage.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hartley; Frankie O G Fraulin; A Robertson Harrop; Peter Faris; James Wick; Paul E Ronksley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  One and done? Outcomes from 3961 patients managed via a virtual fracture clinic pathway for paediatric fractures.

Authors:  Jim Kennedy; Carol Blackburn; Michael Barrett; Patrick O'Toole; David Moore
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.