Mark B Badrov1, Shane R Freeman2, Mary Ann Zokvic2, Philip J Millar3, Cheri L McGowan2. 1. Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada. mbadrov2@uwo.ca. 2. Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada. 3. Clinical Cardiovascular Physiology Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, 6ES 414, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Isometric resistance training has repeatedly shown to be an effective exercise modality in lowering resting blood pressure (BP), yet associated mechanisms and sex differences in the response to training remain unclear. Exploration into potential sex differences in the response to isometric resistance training is necessary, as it may allow for more optimal and sex-based exercise prescription, thereby maximizing the efficacy of the training intervention. PURPOSE: Therefore, we investigated, in normotensives, whether sex differences exist in the response to isometric handgrip (IHG) training. METHODS:Resting BP and endothelium-dependent vasodilation (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation; FMD) were assessed in 11 women (23 ± 4 years) and 9 men (21 ± 2 years) prior to and following 8 weeks ofIHG training (four, 2-min unilateral contractions at 30 % of maximal voluntary contraction; 3 days per week). RESULTS: Main effects of time were observed (all P < 0.05), whereby IHG training reduced systolic BP (Δ 8 ± 6 mmHg), diastolic BP (Δ 2 ± 3 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (Δ 4 ± 3 mmHg), and pulse pressure (Δ 5 ± 7 mmHg), accompanied by increases in absolute (Δ 0.09 ± 0.15 mm) and relative (Δ 2.4 ± 4.1 %) brachial artery FMD; however, no significant sex differences were observed in the magnitude of post-training change in any variable assessed (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:IHG training effectively lowers resting BP and improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in men and women, without significant sex differences in the magnitude of response.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Isometric resistance training has repeatedly shown to be an effective exercise modality in lowering resting blood pressure (BP), yet associated mechanisms and sex differences in the response to training remain unclear. Exploration into potential sex differences in the response to isometric resistance training is necessary, as it may allow for more optimal and sex-based exercise prescription, thereby maximizing the efficacy of the training intervention. PURPOSE: Therefore, we investigated, in normotensives, whether sex differences exist in the response to isometric handgrip (IHG) training. METHODS: Resting BP and endothelium-dependent vasodilation (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation; FMD) were assessed in 11 women (23 ± 4 years) and 9 men (21 ± 2 years) prior to and following 8 weeks of IHG training (four, 2-min unilateral contractions at 30 % of maximal voluntary contraction; 3 days per week). RESULTS: Main effects of time were observed (all P < 0.05), whereby IHG training reduced systolic BP (Δ 8 ± 6 mmHg), diastolic BP (Δ 2 ± 3 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (Δ 4 ± 3 mmHg), and pulse pressure (Δ 5 ± 7 mmHg), accompanied by increases in absolute (Δ 0.09 ± 0.15 mm) and relative (Δ 2.4 ± 4.1 %) brachial artery FMD; however, no significant sex differences were observed in the magnitude of post-training change in any variable assessed (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: IHG training effectively lowers resting BP and improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in men and women, without significant sex differences in the magnitude of response.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mark B Badrov; Cassandra L Bartol; Matthew A DiBartolomeo; Philip J Millar; Nancy H McNevin; Cheri L McGowan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cheri L McGowan; David N Proctor; Ian Swaine; Robert D Brook; Elizabeth A Jackson; Phillip D Levy Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Neil A Smart; Damien Way; Debra Carlson; Philip Millar; Cheri McGowan; Ian Swaine; Anthony Baross; Reuben Howden; Raphael Ritti-Dias; Jim Wiles; Véronique Cornelissen; Ben Gordon; Rod Taylor; Bea Bleile Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Piotr Gronek; Dariusz Wielinski; Piotr Cyganski; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Adam Zając; Adam Maszczyk; Joanna Gronek; Robert Podstawski; Wojciech Czarny; Stefan Balko; Cain Ct Clark; Roman Celka Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 6.745
Authors: Angela Valentina Bisconti; Michela Devoto; Massimo Venturelli; Randall Bryner; I Mark Olfert; Paul D Chantler; F Esposito Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240