Literature DB >> 27137946

Evolution of Stage 1 Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Asma Khalil1, Emily Cooper1, Rosemary Townsend1, Basky Thilaganathan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The natural history of stage 1 Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) remains unclear and its optimal management is yet to be established. The main aims of this meta-analysis were to quantify the incidence of progression in stage 1 TTTS and to ascertain survival in these pregnancies.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched. Reference lists within each article were hand-searched for additional reports. The outcomes included incidence of progression and survival in stage 1 TTTS. Randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were included. Case reports, studies including three or fewer cases of stage 1 TTTS, and editorials were excluded. Proportion meta-analysis was used for analysis (Registration number: CRD42016036190).
RESULTS: The search yielded 3,085 citations; 18 studies were included in the review (172 pregnancies to assess progression and 433 pregnancies to assess the survival). The pooled incidence of progression in stage 1 TTTS was 27% [95% CI 16-39%]. The pooled overall survival, double survival and at least one survival in the pregnancies managed expectantly were 79% [95% CI 62-92%], 70% [95% CI 54-84%] and 87% [95% CI 69-98%], respectively. In those undergoing amnioreduction, the corresponding figures were 77% [95% CI 68-85%], 67% [95% CI 57-76%] and 86% [95% CI 76-94%], respectively. The survival rates were 68% [95% CI 54-81%], 54% [95% CI 36-72%], and 81% [95% CI 69-90%], when laser surgery was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal initial management of stage 1 TTTS remains in equipoise. The ongoing randomized trial comparing immediate laser surgery versus conservative management should provide a definitive answer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TTTS; amniodrainage; conservative; laser; progression; stage 1; survival; twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27137946     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2016.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  6 in total

1.  Stage I Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Outcomes of Expectant Management and Prognostic Features.

Authors:  Erin E Washburn; Teresa N Sparks; Kristen A Gosnell; Larry Rand; Juan M Gonzalez; Vickie A Feldstein
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Incidence, prognosis, and perinatal outcomes of and risk factors for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in the recipient twin after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation.

Authors:  Yao-Lung Chang; An-Shine Chao; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Po-Jen Cheng; Wen-Fang Li; Chin-Chieh Hsu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Authors:  Haruhiko Sago; Keisuke Ishii; Rika Sugibayashi; Katsusuke Ozawa; Masahiro Sumie; Seiji Wada
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Effect of Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation on Fetal Growth and Placental Perfusion in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.

Authors:  Yao-Lung Chang; Chin-Chieh Hsu; An-Shine Chao; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Po-Jen Cheng; Wen-Fang Li
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Effects and outcomes of septostomy in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after fetoscopic laser therapy.

Authors:  Wen-Fang Li; An-Shine Chao; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Po-Jen Cheng; Lan-Yan Yang; Yao-Lung Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Laser for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a guide for endoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  L Van Der Veeken; I Couck; J Van Der Merwe; L De Catte; R Devlieger; J Deprest; L Lewi
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.