Literature DB >> 27137207

Bowel function and quality of life after superior mesenteric nerve plexus transection in right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy.

Y Thorsen1,2, B Stimec3, S N Andersen4, J C Lindstrom5, F Pfeffer6,7, T Oresland1,2, D Ignjatovic8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain the impact of injury to the superior mesenteric nerve plexus caused by right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy as performed in the prospective multicenter trial: "Safe Radical D3 Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer through Preoperative Biphasic Multi-detector Computed Tomography" in which all soft tissue surrounding the superior mesenteric vessels from the level of the middle colic artery to that of the ileocolic artery was removed.
METHODS: Bowel function and gastrointestinal quality of life in two consecutive cohorts that underwent right colectomy with and without D3 extended mesenterectomy were compared. Main outcome measures were the Diarrhea Assessment Scale (DAS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). The data were collected prospectively through telephone interviews.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients per group, comparable for age, sex, length of bowel resected but with significantly shorter follow-up time in the experimental group, were included. There was no difference in total DAS scores, subscores or additional questions except for higher bowel frequency scores in the D3 group (p = 0.02). Comparison of total GIQLI scores and subscales showed no difference between groups. Regression analysis with correction for confounding factors showed 0.48 lower bowel frequency scores in the D2 group (p = 0.022). Within the D3 group presence of jejunal arteries cranial to the D3 dissection area showed 1.78 lower DAS scores and 0.7 lower bowel frequency scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel denervation after right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy leads to increased bowel frequency but does not impact gastrointestinal quality of life. Individual anatomical variants can affect postoperative bowel function differently despite standardized surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel motility; Colorectal cancer; Mesenterectomy; Right hemicolectomy; Superior mesenteric plexus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27137207     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1466-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  18 in total

1.  Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection.

Authors:  Satoshi Hirano; Satoshi Kondo; Eiichi Tanaka; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Kentaro Kato; Joe Matsumoto
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Severe diarrhea following neurolytic coeliac plexus block: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Mohamed El Toukhy; Nicholas Ta Campkin
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Can intestinal innervation be preserved in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer? Results of an anatomical study.

Authors:  M Nano; H Dal Corso; M Ferronato; M Solej; J P Hornung
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  G E Theodoropoulos; I G Papanikolaou; T Karantanos; G Zografos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  [Anatomy of the superior mesenteric plexus and of the nerves of the small intestine in man].

Authors:  V A Sharov
Journal:  Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol       Date:  1974-09

6.  Long-term oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; John Huang; Chia-Tung Sun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The influence of surgery, immunosuppressive drugs, and rejection, on graft function after small bowel transplantation: a large-animal study.

Authors:  Mario Alessiani; Fabrizio De Ponti; Filiberto Fayer; Francesca Abbiati; Sandro Zonta; Ermanno Zitelli; Eloisa Arbustini; Patrizia Morbini; Nicoletta Poggi; Catherine Klersy; Ilaria Blangetti; Paolo Dionigi; Aris Zonta
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Bowel function survey after segmental colorectal resections.

Authors:  Y H Ho; D Low; H S Goh
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Three-dimensional studies on the structure of the tissue surrounding the superior mesenteric artery.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; K Mori; M Kayahara; T Ohta; K Ueno; H Sanada; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1994-04

10.  Development of a simple model of extrinsic denervation of the small bowel in mouse.

Authors:  Javairiah Fatima; Scott G Houghton; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tamara Díaz-Vico; María Fernández-Hevia; Aida Suárez-Sánchez; Carmen García-Gutiérrez; Luka Mihic-Góngora; Daniel Fernández-Martínez; José Antonio Álvarez-Pérez; Jorge Luis Otero-Díez; José Electo Granero-Trancón; Luis Joaquín García-Flórez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Comparison between conventional colectomy and complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis : A review of CME versus conventional colectomies.

Authors:  Noura Alhassan; Mei Yang; Nathalie Wong-Chong; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Gerald M Fried; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI).

Authors:  Noelia Ibáñez; Jesús Abrisqueta; Juan Luján; Quiteria Hernández; María Dolores Rufete; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Defining minimal clearances for adequate lymphatic resection relevant to right colectomy for cancer: a post-mortem study.

Authors:  Jens Marius Nesgaard; Bojan V Stimec; Pricilla Soulie; Bjørn Edwin; Arne Bakka; Dejan Ignjatovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe S Sica; Danilo Vinci; Leandro Siragusa; Bruno Sensi; Andrea M Guida; Vittoria Bellato; Álvaro García-Granero; Gianluca Pellino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Detecting the Non-physiological, Surgically Tailored Ileocolic Anastomosis Using the Wireless Motility Capsule. A Pre- and Post-operative, Prospective, Within Subject Trial.

Authors:  Yngve Thorsen; Bojan V Stimec; Jens M Nesgaard; Dejan Ignjatovic
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 7.  Systematic review: the effect of right hemicolectomy for cancer on postoperative bowel function.

Authors:  C Hope; J Reilly; J Lund; Hjn Andreyev
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Bowel function and quality of life after minimally invasive colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ki-Myung Lee; Se-Jin Baek; Jung-Myun Kwak; Jin Kim; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Anania; R J Davies; F Bagolini; N Vettoretto; J Randolph; R Cirocchi; A Donini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  [Definition and treatment of superior mesenteric artery revascularization and dissection-associated diarrhea (SMARD syndrome) in Germany].

Authors:  Patrick Téoule; Katharina Tombers; Mohammad Rahbari; Flavius Sandra-Petrescu; Michael Keese; Nuh N Rahbari; Christoph Reißfelder; Felix Rückert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.