Literature DB >> 27136301

The price of associating with breeders in the cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babbler: foraging constraints, survival and sociality.

Enrico Sorato1,2, Simon C Griffith1,3, Andy F Russell3,4.   

Abstract

Understanding the costs of living with breeders might offer new insights into the factors that counter evolutionary transitions from selfish individuals to cooperative societies. While selection on early dispersal is well understood, it is less clear whether costs are also associated with remaining with family members during subsequent breeding, a prerequisite to the evolution of kin-based cooperation. We propose and test the hypothesis that living in groups containing breeders is costly and that such costs are exacerbated by increasing group size. For example, in group-living central-place foragers, group members might suffer from resource depletion when foraging in a restricted area during breeding and significant costs of repeatedly travelling between foraging patches and the site of offspring. Using the cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), for which grouping during breeding is obligatory, we show that reproduction is associated with substantially reduced foraging areas and evidence of resource depletion, particularly in larger groups. Such effects largely persisted from the onset of incubation through to offspring independence 4-5 months later. All group members, irrespective of their breeder or helper status, lost significant body mass over this period, and, in males, mass loss was associated with reduced interannual survival. Although babblers are constrained from living outside of breeding groups due to high risks of predation and the poor success of breeding without helpers, we suggest that the effects we describe may generally select against group living during breeding attempts in species where constraints to independent breeding and costs of dispersal are less acute.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benefits-of-philopatry; ecological constraints; family living; habitat saturation; kin competition; movement patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27136301     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  4 in total

1.  Cooperative breeding influences the number and type of vocalizations in avian lineages.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Polydomy enhances foraging performance in ant colonies.

Authors:  N Stroeymeyt; P Joye; L Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?

Authors:  James L Savage; Lucy E Browning; Andrea Manica; Andrew F Russell; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Home range size and habitat use of the blue-crowned laughingthrush during the breeding season.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Yongtao Xu; Bai Mo; Jinze Shi; Yachang Cheng; Weiwei Zhang; Fumin Lei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.