Srdjan Saso1, Alex Clarke2, Timothy Bracewell-Milnes3, Anja Saso4, Maya Al-Memar5, Meen-Yau Thum6, Joseph Yazbek7, Giuseppe Del Priore8, Paul Hardiman9, Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami10, J Richard Smith7. 1. Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom srdjan.saso@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 3. William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom. 4. St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 6. The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom. 7. West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 8. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 9. Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom Royal Free, University College and Whittington NHS Trusts, London, United Kingdom. 10. Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Uterine transplantation (UTx). OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' knowledge of and attitudes toward UTx before and after a short educational intervention via a video and question and answer (Q&A) session. DESIGN: Large, in-depth survey investigating patients' motivations, aims, and beliefs on UTx. SETTING: Imperial College London. PARTICIPANTS: Women diagnosed with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) who were seeking information on UTx and had already volunteered to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: A semistructured interview involving a brief baseline questionnaire before a Q&A session and a 20-minute video exploring the main risks and benefits for UTx. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes of self-referred patients with AUFI toward UTx before and after education focusing on UTx. Rank order of importance of key UTx-related issues. RESULTS: Forty women were interviewed. Following the video presentation and Q&A session, 97.5% (n = 39) would undergo UTx ahead of surrogacy and adoption in full knowledge that the latter 2 options would be ultimately safer for their own well-being and the fact that the graft could fail even prior to conception. All felt that UTx should take place, and 92.5% saw UTx as achievable. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a keen interest in UTx, partly because other options seem difficult to access. It is worth noting that people appear to be distancing themselves from the risk. This requires careful assessment in any clinical program. This study is the first to demonstrate a qualitative relationship between patients with AUFI and their curiosity and desire for UTx. It paves the way for forming the introduction into the psychological assessment of a potential patient.
CONTEXT: Uterine transplantation (UTx). OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' knowledge of and attitudes toward UTx before and after a short educational intervention via a video and question and answer (Q&A) session. DESIGN: Large, in-depth survey investigating patients' motivations, aims, and beliefs on UTx. SETTING: Imperial College London. PARTICIPANTS: Women diagnosed with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) who were seeking information on UTx and had already volunteered to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: A semistructured interview involving a brief baseline questionnaire before a Q&A session and a 20-minute video exploring the main risks and benefits for UTx. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes of self-referred patients with AUFI toward UTx before and after education focusing on UTx. Rank order of importance of key UTx-related issues. RESULTS: Forty women were interviewed. Following the video presentation and Q&A session, 97.5% (n = 39) would undergo UTx ahead of surrogacy and adoption in full knowledge that the latter 2 options would be ultimately safer for their own well-being and the fact that the graft could fail even prior to conception. All felt that UTx should take place, and 92.5% saw UTx as achievable. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a keen interest in UTx, partly because other options seem difficult to access. It is worth noting that people appear to be distancing themselves from the risk. This requires careful assessment in any clinical program. This study is the first to demonstrate a qualitative relationship between patients with AUFI and their curiosity and desire for UTx. It paves the way for forming the introduction into the psychological assessment of a potential patient.
Authors: H E Peters; L J M Juffermans; C B Lambalk; J J M L Dekker; T Fernhout; F A Groenman; C J M de Groot; A W J Hoksbergen; J A F Huirne; R A de Leeuw; N M van Mello; J H Nederhoed; R Schats; M O Verhoeven; W J K Hehenkamp Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2020-02-28
Authors: Benjamin P Jones; Abirami Rajamanoharan; Saaliha Vali; Nicola J Williams; Srdjan Saso; Meen-Yau Thum; Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; Isabel Quiroga; Cesar Diaz-Garcia; Philip Thomas; Stephen Wilkinson; Joseph Yazbek; J Richard Smith Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-01-04