Literature DB >> 27135194

Contrast sensitivity revealed by spontaneous eyeblinks: Evidence for a common mechanism of oculomotor inhibition.

Yoram S Bonneh, Yael Adini, Uri Polat.   

Abstract

Spontaneous eyeblinks are known to serve important physiological functions, and recent evidence shows that they are also linked to cognitive processes. It is yet unclear whether this link reflects a crude rate modulation or, alternatively, an automatic and precise process, tightly linked to the low-level properties of sensory stimuli. We have recently reported (Y. S. Bonneh, Adini, & Polat, 2015) that, for microsaccades, the onset and release from inhibition in response to transient stimuli depend systematically on the low-level stimulus parameters. Here we reanalyzed our previous data for both microsaccades and eyeblinks for observers with sufficient blinking (>10% of trials, 18 of 23 observers tested) who watched and silently counted sequences of Gabor patches at 1 Hz with varied contrast and spatial frequency. We found that spontaneous eyeblinks, although less frequent, were similar to microsaccades in their modulation pattern in response to transient stimuli, demonstrating inhibition and rebound, which were dependent on the contrast and spatial frequency of the stimuli. The average blink response time, measured as the latency of the first blink following its release from inhibition, was longer for lower contrast and higher spatial frequency. Importantly, it was highly correlated with a similar measure for microsaccades as well as with psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity. These results suggest that both eyeblinks and microsaccades are linked to the same inhibitory mechanism that presumably turns off oculomotor events while processing previous events and generates a rebound effect upon its release. The onset of both eyeblinks and microsaccades may thus reflect the time course of this mechanism and the associated cognitive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27135194     DOI: 10.1167/16.7.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Fixation-related saccadic inhibition in free viewing in response to stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Oren Kadosh; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Thomas Hagen; Samira Aminihajibashi; Maja Foldal; Maria Stavrinou; Jens H Halvorsen; Bruno Laeng; Thomas Espeseth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Microsaccades are sensitive to word structure: A novel approach to study language processing.

Authors:  Maya Yablonski; Uri Polat; Yoram S Bonneh; Michal Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Bayesian Inference of Two-Dimensional Contrast Sensitivity Function from Data Obtained with Classical One-Dimensional Algorithms Is Efficient.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Wang; Huan Wang; Jinfeng Huang; Yifeng Zhou; Tzvetomir Tzvetanov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Oculomotor inhibition during smooth pursuit and its dependence on contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Inbal Ziv; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Motor restrictions impair divergent thinking during walking and during sitting.

Authors:  Supriya Murali; Barbara Händel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-08

7.  Involuntary oculomotor inhibition markers of saliency and deviance in response to auditory sequences.

Authors:  Oren Kadosh; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Concealed information revealed by involuntary eye movements on the fringe of awareness in a mock terror experiment.

Authors:  Gal Rosenzweig; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.