Narayan Chandra Sarkar1, Mahendra Tilkar2, Siddhant Jain3, Subrata Mondal4, Piyabi Sarkar5, Nitin Modi6. 1. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G Institute , Indore, MP, India . 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G Institute , Indore, MP, India . 3. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G Institute , Indore, M.P, India . 4. Professor, Department of Cardiology, L.N Medical College , Bhopal, M.P, India . 5. P.G Resident, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research and S.S.K.M Hospital , Kolkata, (W.B), India . 6. Interventional Cardiologist, CHL Apollo Hospital , Indore (M.P), India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We very often face pacemaker implanted patients during follow-up with shortness of breath and effort intolerance inspite of normal clinical parameters. AIM: The aim of our study is to evaluate the cause of effort intolerance and probable cause of sub-clinical Congestive Cardiac Failure (CCF) in a case of long term Right Ventricular (RV) apical pacing on global Left Ventricular (LV) function non- invasively by echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 54 patients (Male 42, Female 12) of complete heart block (CHB) with RV apical pacing (40 VVI and 14 DCP). Mean duration of pacing was 58+4 months. All patients underwent 24 hours Holter monitoring to determine the percentage of ventricular pacing beats. 2-D Echocardiography was done to assess the regional wall motion of abnormality and global LV ejection fraction by modified Simpson's rule. These methods were coupled with the Doppler derived Myocardial Performance Index (MPI), tissue Doppler imaging, and mechanical regional dyssynchrony with 3-D Echocardiography. Data were analysed from 54 RV- apical paced patients and compared with age and body surface area of 60 controlled subjects (Male 46, Female 14). RESULTS: Evaluation of LV function in 54 patients demonstrated regional wall motion abnormality and Doppler study revealed both LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction compare with control subjects (regional wall motion abnormality 80±6% vs 30±3% with p-value<0.0001) which is proportional to the percentage of ventricular pacing beats (mean paced beat 78%). Global LVEF 50±4% vs 60±2% (p-valve <0.0001) and MPI 0.46 ±0.12 v/s 0.36±0.09 (p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION: RV-apical pacing induces iatrogenic electrical dyssynchrony which leads to remodeling of LV and produces mechanical dyssynchrony which is responsible for LV dysfunction. Alternate site of RV pacing and/or biventricular pacing should be done to maintain biventricular electrical synchrony which will preserve the LV function.
INTRODUCTION: We very often face pacemaker implanted patients during follow-up with shortness of breath and effort intolerance inspite of normal clinical parameters. AIM: The aim of our study is to evaluate the cause of effort intolerance and probable cause of sub-clinical Congestive Cardiac Failure (CCF) in a case of long term Right Ventricular (RV) apical pacing on global Left Ventricular (LV) function non- invasively by echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 54 patients (Male 42, Female 12) of complete heart block (CHB) with RV apical pacing (40 VVI and 14 DCP). Mean duration of pacing was 58+4 months. All patients underwent 24 hours Holter monitoring to determine the percentage of ventricular pacing beats. 2-D Echocardiography was done to assess the regional wall motion of abnormality and global LV ejection fraction by modified Simpson's rule. These methods were coupled with the Doppler derived Myocardial Performance Index (MPI), tissue Doppler imaging, and mechanical regional dyssynchrony with 3-D Echocardiography. Data were analysed from 54 RV- apical paced patients and compared with age and body surface area of 60 controlled subjects (Male 46, Female 14). RESULTS: Evaluation of LV function in 54 patients demonstrated regional wall motion abnormality and Doppler study revealed both LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction compare with control subjects (regional wall motion abnormality 80±6% vs 30±3% with p-value<0.0001) which is proportional to the percentage of ventricular pacing beats (mean paced beat 78%). Global LVEF 50±4% vs 60±2% (p-valve <0.0001) and MPI 0.46 ±0.12 v/s 0.36±0.09 (p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION: RV-apical pacing induces iatrogenic electrical dyssynchrony which leads to remodeling of LV and produces mechanical dyssynchrony which is responsible for LV dysfunction. Alternate site of RV pacing and/or biventricular pacing should be done to maintain biventricular electrical synchrony which will preserve the LV function.
Authors: J B Bedotto; P A Grayburn; W H Black; T E Raya; W McBride; H H Hsia; E J Eichhorn Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M A Lee; M W Dae; J J Langberg; J C Griffin; M C Chin; W E Finkbeiner; J W O'Connell; E Botvinick; M M Scheinman; M Rosenqvist Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 24.094