Soumit Dey1, Saikat Datta2, Snehamay Chaudhuri3, Prabir Chandra Paul4, Binny Khandakar1, Sonali Mandal2. 1. Demonstrator, Department of Pathology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, India . 2. Ex-Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, India . 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, India . 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, Malda Medical College , Malda, West Bengal, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The deep seated ovarian lesions unapproachable by unguided aspiration cytology were easily done under ultrasound guidance. It gave a before hand cytological diagnosis of the lesion to the surgeon determining the modality of treatment for the patient. AIM: To find the diagnostic accuracy of the method of ultrasound guided cytological assessment of ovarian lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a prospective observational study over a period of one year, in hospital setting, where ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration had been used to aspirate ovarian lesions, giving a rapid cytological diagnosis. In 43 sample cases, aspiration of fluid done from ovarian lesions were followed by cyto-centrifugation and staining by May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicolaou (Pap) stain providing a cytological opinion regarding benign/malignant nature of the lesion and further categorization. Later the cytological diagnosis was compared with final histopathological diagnosis, taking it as a gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound guided aspiration and cytological analysis were high, 96%, 76.92% and 89.47% respectively as calculated by comparing the cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis, taking it as gold standard. CONCLUSION: This method has evolved as a highly sensitive, rapid, simple and effective modality for screening and as well as accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian lesions.
INTRODUCTION: The deep seated ovarian lesions unapproachable by unguided aspiration cytology were easily done under ultrasound guidance. It gave a before hand cytological diagnosis of the lesion to the surgeon determining the modality of treatment for the patient. AIM: To find the diagnostic accuracy of the method of ultrasound guided cytological assessment of ovarian lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a prospective observational study over a period of one year, in hospital setting, where ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration had been used to aspirate ovarian lesions, giving a rapid cytological diagnosis. In 43 sample cases, aspiration of fluid done from ovarian lesions were followed by cyto-centrifugation and staining by May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicolaou (Pap) stain providing a cytological opinion regarding benign/malignant nature of the lesion and further categorization. Later the cytological diagnosis was compared with final histopathological diagnosis, taking it as a gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound guided aspiration and cytological analysis were high, 96%, 76.92% and 89.47% respectively as calculated by comparing the cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis, taking it as gold standard. CONCLUSION: This method has evolved as a highly sensitive, rapid, simple and effective modality for screening and as well as accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian lesions.
Authors: K Papathanasiou; C Giannoulis; D Dovas; A Tolikas; T Tantanasis; J M Tzafettas Journal: Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004 Impact factor: 0.146