| Literature DB >> 27134544 |
Danhua Liu1, Chong Zhang1, Xiaowei Zhang1, Zhu Zhen1, Ping Wang1, Jianxin Li1, Dongxu Yi1, Ying Jin1, Dan Yang1.
Abstract
Biodegradable poly(d,l-lactide) (PDLLA), Poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(caprolactone-co-d,l-lactide) (PCDLLA) and poly(trimethylene carbonate-co-caprolactone) (PTCL) are recently used for clinical drug delivery system such as subcutaneous contraceptive implant capsule due to their biodegradable properties that they could possess long-term stable performance in vivo without removal, however their permeation rate is unknown. In the work, biodegradable material membranes were prepared by solvent evaporation using chloroform, and commercial silicone rubber membrane served as a control. Gestodene was used as a model drug. Gestodene has high biologic progestational activity which allows for high contraceptive reliability at very low-dose levels. The permeation rate of gestodene for several biodegradable materials was evaluated. In vitro diffusion studies were done using Franz diffusion cells with a diffusion area of 1.33 cm(2). Phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.4), 10% methanol solution and distilled water were taken in donor and receiver chambers at temperature of 37 °C respectively. The in vitro experiments were conducted over a period of 24 h during which samples were collected at regular intervals. The withdrawn samples were appropriately diluted and measured on UV-vis spectrophotometer at 247 nm. Conclusion data from our study showed that permeation rate of PCDLLA with CL ratio more than 70% could be more excellent than commercial silicone rubber membrane. They may be suitable as a candidate carrier for gestodene subcutaneous contraceptive implants in contraceptive fields.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradable materials; Contraceptive implant capsule; Franz diffusion cell; Gestodene; Membrane; Permeation rate
Year: 2015 PMID: 27134544 PMCID: PMC4834674 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
Figure 1Schematic drawing of the diffusion cell with thermostatic water bath.
Comparison of membrane-forming capabilities for different materials.
| Polymer | Molar ratio | Mn × 10−5 | Membrane-forming capabilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTMC17 | – | 17 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; flexible; transparent; adhesive |
| PTMC22 | – | 22 | |
| PTMC29 | – | 29 | |
| PCL6 | – | 6 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; slightly hard; a white appearance |
| PCL10 | – | 10 | |
| PCL16 | – | 16 | |
| PDLLA4 | – | 4 | Difficult to separate them from Petri dishes |
| PDLLA5 | – | 5 | |
| PDLLA7 | – | 7 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; slightly hard; transparent |
| PDLLA12 | – | 12 | |
| PDLLA17 | – | 17 | |
| PCDLLA1:9 | 10:90 | 13 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; moderate hard; anti-adhesive |
| PCDLLA2:8 | 20:80 | 15 | |
| PCDLLA3:7 | 30:70 | 10 | |
| PCDLLA4:6 | 40:60 | 15 | Fine; flexible; adhesive |
| PCDLLA5:5 | 50:50 | 17 | |
| PCDLLA6:4 | 60:40 | 15 | Very poor; difficult to separate them from Petri dishes |
| PCDLLA7:3 | 70:30 | 20 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; moderate hard; anti-adhesive |
| PCDLLA8:2 | 80:20 | 16 | |
| PCDLLA9:1 | 90:10 | 15 | |
| PTCL1:9 | 10:90 | 25 | |
| PTCL2:8 | 20:80 | 24 | |
| PTCL3:7 | 30:70 | 23 | |
| PTCL4:6 | 40:60 | 23 | Fine; easy to be removed from Petri dishes; anti-adhesive |
| PTCL5:5 | 50:50 | 25 | An increase in hardness and opaqueness was correlated with increased caprolactone molar ratio |
| PTCL6:4 | 60:40 | 25 | |
| PTCL7:3 | 70:30 | 25 | |
| PTCL8:2 | 80:20 | 26 | |
| PTCL9:1 | 90:10 | 26 |
Number molecular weight of different polymers before and after membrane-forming.
| Polymer | Molar ratio | Mn × 10−5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before membrane-forming | After membrane-forming | ||
| PTMC17 | – | 17 | 16 |
| PTMC22 | – | 22 | 22 |
| PTMC29 | – | 29 | 28 |
| PCL6 | – | 6 | 6 |
| PCL10 | – | 10 | 9 |
| PCL16 | – | 16 | 16 |
| PDLLA7 | – | 7 | 6 |
| PDLLA12 | – | 12 | 10 |
| PDLLA17 | – | 17 | 15 |
| PCDLLA1:9 | 10:90 | 9 | 10 |
| PCDLLA2:8 | 20:80 | 11 | 9 |
| PCDLLA3:7 | 30:70 | 10 | 9 |
| PCDLLA4:6 | 40:60 | 11 | 9 |
| PCDLLA5:5 | 50:50 | 11 | 10 |
| PCDLLA6:4 | 60:40 | 10 | 8 |
| PCDLLA7:3 | 70:30 | 13 | 10 |
| PCDLLA8:2 | 80:20 | 10 | 10 |
| PCDLLA9:1 | 90:10 | 10 | 8 |
| PTCL1:9 | 10:90 | 25 | 24 |
| PTCL2:8 | 20:80 | 24 | 22 |
| PTCL3:7 | 30:70 | 23 | 23 |
| PTCL4:6 | 40:60 | 23 | 22 |
| PTCL5:5 | 50:50 | 25 | 23 |
| PTCL6:4 | 60:40 | 25 | 24 |
| PTCL7:3 | 70:30 | 25 | 23 |
| PTCL8:2 | 80:20 | 26 | 25 |
| PTCL9:1 | 90:10 | 26 | 24 |
Effect of molecular weight and release media on permeation efficacy for homopolymer.
| Polymer | Mn × 10−5 | Permeation efficacy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | PBS | Methanol | ||
| PTMC17 | 17 | +++ | +++ | +++++ |
| PTMC22 | 22 | ++ | ++ | +++++ |
| PTMC29 | 29 | ++ | + | +++ |
| PCL6 | 6 | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
| PCL10 | 10 | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| PCL16 | 16 | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| PDLLA7 | 7 | + | + | ++ |
| PDLLA12 | 12 | − | + | +++ |
| PDLLA17 | 17 | + | + | ++ |
Cumulative drug release after 24 h was used for the comparison. The number of signs represented different cumulative drug release values: −, <2 μg; +, 2–5 μg; ++, 5–10 μg; +++, 10–15 μg; ++++, 15–20 μg; +++++, >20 μg.
Figure 2Permeation profiles of gestodene through different type of homopolymers and silicone rubber after 24 h.
Effect of molar ratio and release media on permeation efficacy for copolymer PCDLLA.
| Copolymer | Molar ratio | Permeation efficacy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | PBS | Methanol | ||
| PCDLLA1:9 | 10:90 | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PCDLLA2:8 | 20:80 | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PCDLLA3:7 | 30:70 | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PCDLLA4:6 | 40:60 | +++++ | ++++ | +++++ |
| PCDLLA5:5 | 50:50 | +++ | +++ | +++++ |
| PCDLLA6:4 | 60:40 | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| PCDLLA7:3 | 70:30 | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| PCDLLA8:2 | 80:20 | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| PCDLLA9:1 | 90:10 | ++ | + | ++ |
Cumulative drug release after 24 h was used for the comparison. The number of signs represented different cumulative drug release values: −, <2 μg; +, 2–5 μg; ++, 5–10 μg; +++, 10–15 μg; ++++, 15–20 μg; +++++, >20 μg.
Figure 3Permeation profiles of gestodene through various molar ratios of PCDLLA copolymers and silicone rubber after 24 h.
Figure 4Permeation profiles of gestodene through various molar ratios of PTCL copolymers and silicone rubber after 24 h.
Effect of molar ratio and release media on permeation efficacy for copolymer PTCL.
| Copolymer | Molar ratio | Permeation efficacy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | PBS | Methanol | ||
| PTCL1:9 | 10:90 | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| PTCL2:8 | 20:80 | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| PTCL3:7 | 30:70 | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL4:6 | 40:60 | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL5:5 | 50:50 | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL6:4 | 60:40 | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL7:3 | 70:30 | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL8:2 | 80:20 | +++ | +++++ | +++++ |
| PTCL9:1 | 90:10 | ++ | ++ | ++++ |
Cumulative drug release after 24 h was used for the comparison. The number of signs represented different cumulative drug release values: -, <2 μg; +, 2–5 μg; ++, 5–10 μg; +++, 10–15 μg; ++++, 15–20 μg; +++++, >20 μg.