Kisu Park1, Young Kim1, Yijung Chung2, Sujin Hwang3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Science, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Division of Health, Baekseok University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different height of high heels on muscle activation of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae in healthy young women. [Subjects and Methods] Thirteen healthy women were recruited in this study. To examine the effects of different heights of heels on muscle activation, the paraspinalis cervicis (cervical spine) and erector spinae (lumbar spine) were measured at the time of heel strike and toe off during gait on three different conditions (barefoot, 4 cm high heels, and 10 cm high heels). There are no previous trials or reports that have evaluated this approach in patients with chronic neck pain. [Results] A significant increase in muscle activation of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae at heel strike and toe off (except that of the paraspinalis cervicis at toe off in healthy subjects) was observed in the under 10 cm high heel condition as, compared to that with barefoot condition, in all the subjects. [Conclusion] The height of the high heels affects to the activation demand of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae in patients with neck pain.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different height of high heels on muscle activation of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae in healthy young women. [Subjects and Methods] Thirteen healthy women were recruited in this study. To examine the effects of different heights of heels on muscle activation, the paraspinalis cervicis (cervical spine) and erector spinae (lumbar spine) were measured at the time of heel strike and toe off during gait on three different conditions (barefoot, 4 cm high heels, and 10 cm high heels). There are no previous trials or reports that have evaluated this approach in patients with chronic neck pain. [Results] A significant increase in muscle activation of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae at heel strike and toe off (except that of the paraspinalis cervicis at toe off in healthy subjects) was observed in the under 10 cm high heel condition as, compared to that with barefoot condition, in all the subjects. [Conclusion] The height of the high heels affects to the activation demand of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae in patients with neck pain.
Women have relatively weak neck muscles, which can be a primary cause of chronic fatigue
syndrome related to the muscular system, resulting in higher risk of chronic neck pain1). In relation to pain a study by Fisher found
that 62% of women wear heels that are over 5 cm, and the ones who enjoy wearing high heels
are reported to suffer from foot, knee, and back pain, as well as an alteration of the
normal gait patterns2). According to
previous studies, wearing high-heeled footwear can alter the static posture and dynamic
movements of the body, and is regarded as a cause of musculoskeletal problems related to the
spine3,4,5). Walking in high-heeled shoes changes the
kinetic characteristics of the lower extremity joints, causing a reduction in ankle plantar
flexor muscle moment, and power during stance phase and increases in forefoot peak pressure.
Walking in high heels produces an upward displacement of the center of mass of the body and
possibly a more unstable posture compared to that producted by low-heeled walking6,7,8,9).
Additionally, shock and ground reaction forces can lead to increased axial pressure onto the
intervertebral discs, resulting in increased erector spinal muscle activation10). Walking in high-heeled shoes produce an
increase in the ground reaction force compared to flat heeled shoes. In theory, the increase
in ground reaction force with increased height may result from decreased subtalar joint
pronation at heel strike and a lengthened tibiofemoral lever arm. As a result, trunk muscle
activity increases with increasing heel height, which changes the posture and ground
reaction force, leading to discomfort of the back muscle in women who wear high heels11). In addition, the effects are magnified
with increased activation of the erector spinae muscles, which contribute to compression of
the spine. Therefore, wearing high heels for an extended period can lead to an increase in
paraspinal musculature activation of the lumbar and cervical spine, causing prolonged
overload and fatigue in the trunk and neck muscles1).A recent study reported that walking in heels induced a significant increase in the
activation of cervical muscles in healthy subjects. However, research on the influence of
wearing high heels is still insufficient. This study was conducted in order to examine the
effects of wearing high heels during gait on the cervical and lumbar musculature in patients
with chronic neck pain and in healthy women.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Thirteen healthy women were recruited for this study. An information leaflet describing the
study method and procedure was used for the recruitment of subjects. The inclusion criteria
for patients were as follows: (1) history of neck pain for the past three months or less,
(2) between the age of 20–45 years, (3) not experiencing orthopedic or neurological problems
other than neck pain, and (4) able to wear high heels without pain. This study excluded
subjects who felt acute worsening of pain symptoms during their maximal effort or who were
in an unstable condition with an acute flare up during the time of testing. All participants
agreed to participate and signed the consent form. The study was approved by the local
institutional review board. Table 1 shows a list of common characteristic of the participants in this study. A
test on the general characteristics of the subjects was filled out prior to conduct of this
study. To determine the effects of the different heights of heels on the muscle activation,
the paraspinalis cervicis (cervical spine) and erector spinae (lumbar spine) were measured
at the time of heel strike and toe off during gait. After preparing the skin by shaving,
cleaning with alcohol, and sanding, two differential surface electrodes were placed at a
distance of 2 cm from each other. Surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed on
the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae of the subjects’ dominant side. All electrodes
were placed over the muscle mass, which was visible during maximally resisted voluntary
contraction. Two foot switches were placed and attached on the shoe exterior, underneath the
first metatarsal head area and the heel of the shoe on the dominant side.
Table 1.
Demographic data of the collective intention to treat (N=13)
Variable
Mean±standard deviation
Age (yrs)
31.5±6.6
Height (cm)
161.1±4.2
Body mass (kg)
55.1±7.5
To familiarize the subjects to the testing condition with surface electromyography (EMG)
attached to their body, they were instructed to walk down the walkway three times prior to
the testing condition. Each subject was instructed to walk naturally at a self-selected
velocity on a flat and even surface under three different testing conditions (barefoot, 4 cm
stiletto heels, and 10 cm stiletto heels with a base of 1 cm2). Each condition
was randomly selected and was repeated three times. Prior to each gait trial, subjects were
instructed to stand still with their feet together in a comfortable position, and then were
asked to look straight up and walk down the 10 m walkway in front of them. To prevent
muscular fatigue, a one-minute break was given after three measurements. Among the surface
EMG data collected during the 10 m walk, the data during the middle 6 m block was used for
analysis. Data from the three trials were averaged for analysis using the heel strike and
toe off events for each gait trial. All subjects with neck pain were in a stable condition
without an acute flare up during the time of testing.Differences in the EMG activity of the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae in patients
with neck pain during heel strike and toe off during gait were assessed using the SPSS 12.0
Program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was conducted to ensure
that the variables were normally distributed. A one-way repeated ANOVA was used for the
identification of significant differences among the barefoot, 4 cm high heel, and 10 cm high
heel conditions; and a post-hoc test using the least-significant-difference (LSD) method was
employed for comparing the conditions. Statistical significance was set to p<0.05.
RESULTS
Muscle activation in the paraspinalis cervicis and erector spinae at heel strike and toe
off (except that of paraspinalis cervicis at toe off event) differed significantly with the
10 cm high heels, compared to the barefoot condition. At heel strike, muscle activation of
the paraspinalis cervicis was significantly greater with the 10 cm high heels as compared to
that with the 4 cm high heels (Table
2).
Table 2.
Muscle activation (%MVIC) in normal subjects under the three conditions (N =
13)
Muscles
Gait cycle
Barefoot
4 cm high-heeled
10 cm high-heeled
Cervical paraspinae
Heel strike
7.6±2.1a
7.7±2.4
9.4±3.2*†
Toe off
7.5±1.8
7.1±1.6
8.2±2.5
Erector spinae
Heel strike
24.7±8.2
29.5±10.5
31.2±12.3*
Toe off
28.3±10.5
30.3±11.1
36.2±18.3*
aMean±SD. %MVIC: %maximum voluntary isometric contraction. *Significant differences compared to barefoot condition. †Significant differences compared to 4 cm high-heeled condition
aMean±SD. %MVIC: %maximum voluntary isometric contraction. *Significant differences compared to barefoot condition. †Significant differences compared to 4 cm high-heeled condition
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated the effects of walking in high heels on the muscular activity of
the cervical and lumbar muscles in healthy women. Previous studies have reported the muscle
activation or biomechanical effects of walking in high heels in healthy women. Mika and
coworkers studied the effects of walking on barefoot, 4 cm high heels, and 10 cm high heels
on the activation of the cervical paraspinalis in young women (20–25 years) and older women
(45–55 years). The results showed a significant increase in cervical muscle activation while
walking in 10 cm high heels. Subjects in the older group showed a significant increase in
the cervical muscle activation at heel strike while walking in 4 cm high heels and 10 cm
high heels. A higher magnitude of vertical ground reaction force was demonstrated with high
heels, and the effects were amplified with the presence of more active erector spinae
muscles, which could act partially to compress the spine12, 13).Results of previous studies have demonstrated an increase in the compensated muscular
activities with an increasing heel height. Wearing high heels changes the overall body
posture and loading on the spine and the joints in the lower extremities, resulting in a
change in the body’s center of mass (COM). Snow and Williams reported that wearing
excessively high heels induces a shift in the body’s COM anteriorly and superiorly. Ankle is
shifted superiorly and anteriorly, and the base of support (BOS) shifts anteriorly. As the
body tries to maintain this posture without falling, compensatory activity of both the
erector spinae and the cervical paraspinalis increases14). Cervical spine movement assists in maintaining the head stability
in space, assists in dynamic postural control, and compensates for trunk motion to maintain
head stability during gait. With neck extension, the center of mass of the head is moved
posteriorly, thereby maintaining the head position above the trunk. Neck extension may also
assist in balancing the head over the trunk due to the center of mass of the head lying
anterior to the cervical spine.Previous studies also attempted to determine the lumbar curve angle, center of mass, and
activation of the erector spinae during the gait of healthy women wearing high-heeled
shoes6, 15). The results indicated a significant decrease in the lumbar curve
angle and, in the vertical movement of the body’s center of mass, and a significant increase
in activation of the erector spinae. Our results showed a significant increase in muscle
activation of the erector spinae at heel strike and toe-off events while wearing 10 cm high
heel, as compared to that in barefoot condition in all subjects.The results of our study demonstrated that wearing high-heeled shoes increases the
activation of cervical and lumbar musculature in healthy women16). According to Mika and colleagues, even healthy people
wearing high-heeled shoes experience increased back muscle activity during gait, which could
promote local muscle fatigue, in turn leading to tissue deformation, such as swelling or
decreased movement13). In addition, these
symptoms may be more remarkable while wearing stiletto type high heels with unstable
balance.This study investigated only the immediate effects of wearing high heels on walking.
Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects between high-heeled shoes and
the mechanism of muscle activation of the cervical and lumbar spine. Another limitation of
this study was the small number of recruited subjects. For a more accurate observation of
the relationship between neck pain and high-heeled shoes, a follow-up study with a longer
period of time and a larger experimental group should be conducted. Future studies will be
necessary to evaluate the effect of high-heels on cervical spine kinematics and muscle
fatigue over an extended period of time. In addition, consideration of changes in body
alignment and muscle activation caused by extrinsic factors, such as high-heeled shoes, may
be a more effective approach for planning treatment strategies.
Authors: R L Cromwell; T K Aadland-Monahan; A T Nelson; S M Stern-Sylvestre; B Seder Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Adam B Yanke; Rebecca Bell; Andrew Lee; Richard W Kang; Richard C Mather; Elizabeth F Shewman; Vincent M Wang; Bernard R Bach Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Angela Mika; Simone L Reynolds; Frida C Mohlin; Charlene Willis; Pearl M Swe; Darren A Pickering; Vanja Halilovic; Lakshmi C Wijeyewickrema; Robert N Pike; Anna M Blom; David J Kemp; Katja Fischer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 3.240