Andrea Freyer Dugas1, Thomas D Kirsch2, Matthew Toerper1, Fred Korley1, Gayane Yenokyan3, Daniel France4, David Hager5, Scott Levin6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient triage is necessary to manage excessive patient volumes and identify those with critical conditions. The most common triage system used today, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), focuses on resources utilized and critical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study derives and validates a computer-based electronic triage system (ETS) to improve patient acuity distribution based on serious patient outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of 25,198 (97 million weighted) adult emergency department visits from the 2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. The ETS distributes patients by using a composite outcome based on the estimated probability of mortality, intensive care unit admission, or transfer to operating room or catheterization suite. We compared the ETS with the ESI based on the differentiation of patients, outcomes, inpatient hospitalization, and resource utilization. RESULTS: Of the patients included, 3.3% had the composite outcome and 14% were admitted, and 2.52 resources/patient were used. Of the 90% triaged to low-acuity levels, ETS distributed patients evenly (Level 3: 30%; Level 4: 30%, and Level 5: 29%) compared to ESI (46%, 34%, and 7%, respectively). The ETS better-identified patients with the composite outcome present in 40% of ETS Level 1 vs. 17% for ESI and the ETS area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.83 vs. ESI 0.73. Similar results were found for hospital admission (ETS AUC = 0.83 vs. ESI AUC = 0.72). The ETS demonstrated slight improvements in discriminating patient resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The ETS is a triage system based on the frequency of critical outcomes that demonstrate improved differentiation of patients compared to the current standard ESI.
BACKGROUND:Patient triage is necessary to manage excessive patient volumes and identify those with critical conditions. The most common triage system used today, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), focuses on resources utilized and critical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study derives and validates a computer-based electronic triage system (ETS) to improve patient acuity distribution based on serious patient outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of 25,198 (97 million weighted) adult emergency department visits from the 2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. The ETS distributes patients by using a composite outcome based on the estimated probability of mortality, intensive care unit admission, or transfer to operating room or catheterization suite. We compared the ETS with the ESI based on the differentiation of patients, outcomes, inpatient hospitalization, and resource utilization. RESULTS: Of the patients included, 3.3% had the composite outcome and 14% were admitted, and 2.52 resources/patient were used. Of the 90% triaged to low-acuity levels, ETS distributed patients evenly (Level 3: 30%; Level 4: 30%, and Level 5: 29%) compared to ESI (46%, 34%, and 7%, respectively). The ETS better-identified patients with the composite outcome present in 40% of ETS Level 1 vs. 17% for ESI and the ETS area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.83 vs. ESI 0.73. Similar results were found for hospital admission (ETS AUC = 0.83 vs. ESI AUC = 0.72). The ETS demonstrated slight improvements in discriminating patient resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The ETS is a triage system based on the frequency of critical outcomes that demonstrate improved differentiation of patients compared to the current standard ESI.
Authors: Eili Y Klein; Elena M Martinez; Larissa May; Mustapha Saheed; Valerie Reyna; David A Broniatowski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephanie O Frisch; Julissa Brown; Ziad Faramand; Jennifer Stemler; Ervin Sejdić; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton Callaway; Susan M Sereika; Salah S Al-Zaiti Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Jeremiah S Hinson; Eili Klein; Aria Smith; Matthew Toerper; Trushar Dungarani; David Hager; Peter Hill; Gabor Kelen; Joshua D Niforatos; R Scott Stephens; Alexandra T Strauss; Scott Levin Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-07-16
Authors: Jeremiah S Hinson; Diego A Martinez; Paulo S K Schmitz; Matthew Toerper; Danieli Radu; James Scheulen; Sarah A Stewart de Ramirez; Scott Levin Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2018-01-15