Literature DB >> 2713288

Socio-economic status and pregnancy outcome. An Australian study.

J Morrison1, J M Najman, G M Williams, J D Keeping, M J Andersen.   

Abstract

A prospective cohort of 8556 pregnant women attending the Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane was examined to consider the impact of socio-economic status on pregnancy outcome. The indicators of socio-economic status selected were family income, maternal education and paternal occupational status. Pregnancy outcomes considered were preterm delivery, low birthweight, low birthweight for gestational age, and perinatal death. Subsidiary analyses were also undertaken for Apgar scores, time to establish respiration, need for mechanical respiration and admission to intensive care. Before adjustment, the main consistent association was between the occupational status of the father and three measures of perinatal morbidity. Initial adjustment for the mother's socio-demographic background and weight/height ratio reduced the strength and statistical significance of the above associations, while further adjustment for lifestyle variations between the three status groups further reduced the above associations to marginal statistical significance. The findings suggest that observed class differences in pregnancy outcome are attributable to the mother's personal characteristics (height/weight, parity) and her lifestyle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2713288     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02389.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  9 in total

1.  The association of low socio-economic status in metropolitan Adelaide with maternal demographic and obstetric characteristics and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  O Jonas; D Roder; A Chan
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Obstetric and Perinatal Morbidity in Northern Tasmanian Aboriginal Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rashida Hakeem; Amanda Dennis; Kathryn Ogden; Kiran D K Ahuja; Mohammed Abdul Hakeem
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

3.  Socioeconomic and work related determinants of pregnancy outcome in southern Thailand.

Authors:  P Tuntiseranee; J Olsen; V Chongsuvivatwong; S Limbutara
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Intrauterine growth retardation and premature delivery: the influence of maternal smoking and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  M Nordentoft; H C Lou; D Hansen; J Nim; O Pryds; P Rubin; R Hemmingsen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Socioeconomic status accounts for rapidly increasing geographic variation in the incidence of poor fetal growth.

Authors:  Stephen J Ball; Peter Jacoby; Stephen R Zubrick
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Miscarriage, preterm delivery, and stillbirth: large variations in rates within a cohort of Australian women.

Authors:  Alexis J Hure; Jennifer R Powers; Gita D Mishra; Danielle L Herbert; Julie E Byles; Deborah Loxton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence of neonatal near miss and associated factors in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rajbanshi Sushma; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Risk of low Apgar score and socioeconomic position: a study of Swedish male births.

Authors:  David E Odd; Pat Doyle; David Gunnell; Glyn Lewis; Andrew Whitelaw; Finn Rasmussen
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Socioeconomic status and stress rate during pregnancy in Iran.

Authors:  Sara Shishehgar; Mahrokh Dolatian; Hamid Alavi Majd; Maryam Bakhtiary
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-04-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.