Literature DB >> 27132699

Red blood cell processing methods and in-hospital mortality: a transfusion registry cohort study.

Nancy M Heddle1, Donald M Arnold2, Jason P Acker3, Yang Liu4, Rebecca L Barty4, John W Eikelboom4, Kathryn E Webert5, Cyrus C Hsia6, Sheila F O'Brien7, Richard J Cook8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of red blood cells (RBCs) varies depending on the method of processing the whole blood donation, and the method of processing might affect outcomes in patients transfused RBCs. We aimed to establish whether an association exists between in-hospital mortality and RBC processing method and duration of storage.
METHODS: We did a retrospective registry cohort study using data from three acute care hospitals in Hamilton, ON, Canada, and Canadian Blood Services over a 6-year period (2008-14). Adult patients (≥18 years) who were admitted to hospital and who received RBC transfusions were included in the study. All transfused RBCs were characterised by the method of processing (red cell filtered or whole blood filtered) and storage age (fresh 1-7 days, mid 8-35 days, and old 36-42 days). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent stratification variables and fixed stratification variables, and controlled for patient covariates.
FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2014, 91 065 RBC transfusions were given to 23 634 adults who were included in the analyses. When storage duration was included in the model, in-hospital mortality was significantly increased with fresh whole blood filtered units compared with the reference group of mid-age red cell filtered units (hazard ratio 2·19, 95% CI 1·09-4·42; p=0·033). Differences between other age and processing categories were not significant.
INTERPRETATION: The potential effect of whole blood processing methods on patient outcomes is worthy of further investigation, since adverse outcomes could be reduced by minor changes to blood processing methods and inventory management policies. FUNDING: Canadian Blood Services, Health Canada, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27132699     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)00020-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  18 in total

Review 1.  Red blood cell components: time to revisit the sources of variability.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Blood manufacturing methods affect red blood cell product characteristics and immunomodulatory activity.

Authors:  Ruqayyah J Almizraq; Philip J Norris; Heather Inglis; Somaang Menocha; Mathijs R Wirtz; Nicole Juffermans; Suchitra Pandey; Philip C Spinella; Jason P Acker; Jennifer A Muszynski
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-09-25

4.  Methodological considerations for linked blood donor-component-recipient analyses in transfusion medicine research.

Authors:  Nareg Roubinian; Steven Kleinman; Edward L Murphy; Simone A Glynn; Gustaf Edgren
Journal:  ISBT Sci Ser       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Processing methods and storage duration impact extracellular vesicle counts in red blood cell units.

Authors:  Clementine Gamonet; Maxime Desmarets; Guillaume Mourey; Sabeha Biichle; Sophie Aupet; Caroline Laheurte; Anne François; Eric Resch; Frédéric Bigey; Delphine Binda; Laurent Bardiaux; Christian Naegelen; Nadine Marpaux; Fanny Angelot Delettre; Philippe Saas; Pascal Morel; Pierre Tiberghien; Jacques Lacroix; Gilles Capellier; Chrystelle Vidal; Francine Garnache-Ottou
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

6.  Donor-dependent aging of young and old red blood cell subpopulations: Metabolic and functional heterogeneity.

Authors:  Olga Mykhailova; Carly Olafson; Tracey R Turner; Angelo DʼAlessandro; Jason P Acker
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Ethnicity, sex, and age are determinants of red blood cell storage and stress hemolysis: results of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study.

Authors:  Tamir Kanias; Marion C Lanteri; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Stacy M Endres; Mars Stone; Sheila Keating; Alan E Mast; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Joseph E Kiss; Edward L Murphy; Steve Kleinman; Michael P Busch; Mark T Gladwin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-06-27

8.  New blood for old? High quality evidence that fresh red blood cells confer no benefit for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Timothy S Walsh; Nicole P Juffermans
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Association of donor age, body mass index, hemoglobin, and smoking status with in-hospital mortality and length of stay among red blood cell-transfused recipients.

Authors:  Nareg H Roubinian; Matt Westlake; Elizabeth M St Lezin; Gustaf Edgren; Don J Brambilla; Catherine Lee; Roberta Bruhn; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Simone A Glynn; Steve Kleinman; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Proceedings of the Food and Drug Administration's public workshop on new red blood cell product regulatory science 2016.

Authors:  Jaroslav G Vostal; Paul W Buehler; Monique P Gelderman; Abdu I Alayash; Alan Doctor; James C Zimring; Simone A Glynn; John R Hess; Harvey Klein; Jason P Acker; Philip C Spinella; Angelo D'Alessandro; Bernhard Palsson; Thomas J Raife; Michael P Busch; Timothy J McMahon; Marcos Intaglietta; Harold M Swartz; Michael A Dubick; Sylvain Cardin; Rakesh P Patel; Charles Natanson; John W Weisel; Jennifer A Muszynski; Philip J Norris; Paul M Ness
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.