Literature DB >> 27131984

Does increasing the number of short implants reduce marginal bone loss in the posterior mandible? A prospective study.

Reza Tabrizi1, Hamidreza Arabion2, Ehsan Aliabadi2, Farzaneh Hasanzadeh3.   

Abstract

Marginal bone loss is a concern in the long-term prognosis of short dental implants. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the loss when variable numbers of short implants were used in the posterior mandible. The subjects were allocated into three groups according to the number of short implants. The first group was given two, the second three, and the third four. Each patient had radiographs taken immediately after loading and repeated 36 months later. Twenty- three subjects with 65 implants were entered in the three groups. The mean (SD) marginal bone loss was 0.49 (0.04) mm in the two implant group, 0.41 (0.25) mm in the three implant group, and 0.35 (0.25) mm in the four implant group. There were significant differences in marginal bone loss among the three groups (p=0.001), in that the fewer the number of short implant-supported fixed prostheses in the posterior mandible, the greater the marginal bone loss. When we used more short implants the amount of marginal bone loss decreased.
Copyright © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone loss; Fixed prosthesis; Mandible; Short implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27131984     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  2 in total

1.  Bone quality effect on short implants in the edentulous mandible: a finite element study.

Authors:  Chaowei Liu; Yifeng Xing; Yan Li; Yanjun Lin; Jianghan Xu; Dong Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Extra-Short, Short, and Conventional Implants. A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Daycelí Estévez-Pérez; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Carlos Labaig-Rueda; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; José Amengual-Lorenzo; Fernando García-Sala Bonmatí; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Rubén Agustín-Panadero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.